The Five and Three · Translation: Bhikkhu Sujato, SuttaCentral
Parallels & more translations on SuttaCentral
thereTatra,
monksbhikkhave,
whoye
thosete
ascetics and brahminssamaṇabrāhmaṇā
percipientsaññiṁ
selfattānaṁ
assertpaññapenti
healthyarogaṁ
afterparaṁ
deathmaraṇā
they reject themtesamete
rejectpaṭikkosanti.
thatTaṁ
whatkissa
reason?hetu?
perceptionSaññā
a diseaserogo
perceptionsaññā
a boilgaṇḍo
perceptionsaññā
a dartsallaṁ,
thisetaṁ
is peacefulsantaṁ
thisetaṁ
is sublimepaṇītaṁ
that is to sayyadidaṁ:
non-perception‘asaññan’ti.
So they reject those who assert a self that is percipient and healthy after death. Why is that? Because they believe that perception is a disease, a boil, a dart, and that the state of non-perception is peaceful and sublime.
this tooTayidaṁ,
monksbhikkhave,
the Realized Onetathāgato
understandsabhijānāti
whoye
indeedkho
thosete
sirsbhonto
ascetics and brahminssamaṇabrāhmaṇā
non-percipientasaññiṁ
a selfattānaṁ
assertpaññapenti
healthyarogaṁ
afterparaṁ
deathmaraṇā,
as formedrūpiṁ
orvā
thosete
sirsbhonto
ascetics and brahminssamaṇabrāhmaṇā
non-percipientasaññiṁ
a selfattānaṁ
assertpaññapenti
healthyarogaṁ
afterparaṁ
deathmaraṇā,
as formlessarūpiṁ
orvā
thosete
sirsbhonto
ascetics and brahminssamaṇabrāhmaṇā
non-percipientasaññiṁ
a selfattānaṁ
assertpaññapenti
healthyarogaṁ
afterparaṁ
deathmaraṇā,
both formedrūpiñca
and formlessarūpiñca
orvā
thosete
sirsbhonto
ascetics and brahminssamaṇabrāhmaṇā
non-percipientasaññiṁ
a selfattānaṁ
assertpaññapenti
healthyarogaṁ
afterparaṁ
deathmaraṇā,
neither formednevarūpiṁ
nor formlessnārūpiṁ
orvā
thosete
sirsbhonto
ascetics and brahminssamaṇabrāhmaṇā
non-percipientasaññiṁ
a selfattānaṁ
assertpaññapenti
healthyarogaṁ
afterparaṁ
deathmaraṇā.
whoeverYo
indeedhi
anykoci,
monksbhikkhave,
asceticsamaṇo
orvā
brahminbrāhmaṇo
orvā
thusevaṁ
should sayvadeyya:
I apart from‘ahamaññatra
formrūpā,
apart fromaññatra
feelingvedanāya,
apart fromaññatra
perceptionsaññāya,
apart fromaññatra
choicessaṅkhārehi,
of consciousnessviññāṇassa
comingāgatiṁ
orvā
goinggatiṁ
orvā
passing awaycutiṁ
orvā
reappearingupapattiṁ
orvā
growthvuddhiṁ
orvā
increasevirūḷhiṁ
orvā
maturityvepullaṁ
orvā
I will describepaññapessāmī’ti—
this is notnetaṁ
possibleṭhānaṁ
is foundvijjati.
The Realized One understands this as follows. There are ascetics and brahmins who assert a self that is non-percipient and healthy after death, describing it as formed, or formless, or both formed and formless, or neither formed nor formless. But if any ascetic or brahmin should say this: ‘Apart from form, feeling, perception, and choices, I will describe the coming and going of consciousness, its passing away and reappearing, its growth, increase, and maturity.’ That is not possible.
that indeed this‘Tayidaṁ
conditionedsaṅkhataṁ
coarseoḷārikaṁ
there isatthi
indeedkho
butpana
of conditionssaṅkhārānaṁ
cessationnirodho
it is realatthetan’ti—
thusiti
having understoodviditvā
of thattassa
seeing the escapenissaraṇadassāvī
the Realized Onetathāgato
has gone beyond thattadupātivatto.
‘All that is conditioned and crude. But there is the cessation of conditions—that is real.’ Understanding this and seeing the escape from it, the Realized One has gone beyond all that.
thereTatra, o monksbhikkhave, whoye thosete ascetics and brahminssamaṇabrāhmaṇā neither percipient nor non-percipientnevasaññīnāsaññiṁ selfattānaṁ assertpaññapenti healthyarogaṁ afterparaṁ deathmaraṇā, formedrūpiṁ orvā thosete sirsbhonto ascetics and brahminssamaṇabrāhmaṇā neither percipient nor non-percipientnevasaññīnāsaññiṁ selfattānaṁ assertpaññapenti healthyarogaṁ afterparaṁ deathmaraṇā, formlessarūpiṁ orvā thosete sirsbhonto ascetics and brahminssamaṇabrāhmaṇā neither percipient nor non-percipientnevasaññīnāsaññiṁ selfattānaṁ assertpaññapenti healthyarogaṁ afterparaṁ deathmaraṇā, both formed and formlessrūpiñca formless andarūpiñca orvā thosete sirsbhonto ascetics and brahminssamaṇabrāhmaṇā neither percipient nor non-percipientnevasaññīnāsaññiṁ selfattānaṁ assertpaññapenti healthyarogaṁ afterparaṁ deathmaraṇā, neither formednevarūpiṁ nor formlessnārūpiṁ orvā thosete sirsbhonto ascetics and brahminssamaṇabrāhmaṇā neither percipient nor non-percipientnevasaññīnāsaññiṁ selfattānaṁ assertpaññapenti healthyarogaṁ afterparaṁ deathmaraṇā.
Now, the ascetics and brahmins who assert a self that is neither percipient nor non-percipient and healthy after death describe it as formed, or formless, or both formed and formless, or neither formed nor formless.
thereTatra,
monksbhikkhave,
whoye
thosete
ascetics and brahminssamaṇabrāhmaṇā
percipientsaññiṁ
selfattānaṁ
they assertpaññapenti
healthyarogaṁ
afterparaṁ
deathmaraṇā
they reject thosetesamete
they rejectpaṭikkosanti,
and whoyepi
thosete
goodbhonto
ascetics and brahminssamaṇabrāhmaṇā
non-percipientasaññiṁ
selfattānaṁ
they assertpaññapenti
healthyarogaṁ
afterparaṁ
deathmaraṇā
they reject thosetesamete
they rejectpaṭikkosanti.
thatTaṁ
of whatkissa
reason?hetu?
perceptionSaññā
a diseaserogo
perceptionsaññā
a boilgaṇḍo
perceptionsaññā
a dartsallaṁ,
non-perceptionasaññā
a stuporsammoho,
thisetaṁ
peacefulsantaṁ
thisetaṁ
sublimepaṇītaṁ
namelyyadidaṁ:
neither perception nor non-perception‘nevasaññānāsaññan’ti.
So they reject those who assert a self that is percipient and healthy after death, as well as those who assert a self that is non-percipient and healthy after death. Why is that? Because they believe that perception is a disease, a boil, a dart; that non-perception is a stupor; and that the state of neither perception nor non-perception is peaceful and sublime.
this, that isTayidaṁ,
monksbhikkhave,
the Realized Onetathāgato
understandsabhijānāti.
whoYe
indeedkho
thosete
good sirsbhonto
ascetics and brahminssamaṇabrāhmaṇā
neither percipient nor non-percipientnevasaññīnāsaññiṁ
selfattānaṁ
assertpaññapenti
healthyarogaṁ
afterparaṁ
deathmaraṇā,
formedrūpiṁ
orvā
thosete
good sirsbhonto
ascetics and brahminssamaṇabrāhmaṇā
neither percipient nor non-percipientnevasaññīnāsaññiṁ
selfattānaṁ
assertpaññapenti
healthyarogaṁ
afterparaṁ
deathmaraṇā,
formlessarūpiṁ
orvā
thosete
good sirsbhonto
ascetics and brahminssamaṇabrāhmaṇā
neither percipient nor non-percipientnevasaññīnāsaññiṁ
selfattānaṁ
assertpaññapenti
healthyarogaṁ
afterparaṁ
deathmaraṇā,
both formed andrūpiñca
formless andarūpiñca
orvā
thosete
good sirsbhonto
ascetics and brahminssamaṇabrāhmaṇā
neither percipient nor non-percipientnevasaññīnāsaññiṁ
selfattānaṁ
assertpaññapenti
healthyarogaṁ
afterparaṁ
deathmaraṇā,
neither formednevarūpiṁ
nor formlessnārūpiṁ
orvā
thosete
good sirsbhonto
ascetics and brahminssamaṇabrāhmaṇā
neither percipient nor non-percipientnevasaññīnāsaññiṁ
selfattānaṁ
assertpaññapenti
healthyarogaṁ
afterparaṁ
deathmaraṇā.
whoYe
indeedhi
anykeci,
monksbhikkhave,
asceticssamaṇā
orvā
brahminsbrāhmaṇā
orvā
merely by conditioned phenomena of what ought be seen heard thought and knowndiṭṭhasutamutaviññātabbasaṅkhāramattena
of thisetassa
dimensionāyatanassa
embracingupasampadaṁ
assertpaññapenti,
that is a disasterbyasanañhetaṁ,
monksbhikkhave,
is saidakkhāyati
of thisetassa
dimensionāyatanassa
of the embracingupasampadāya.
notNa
this, indeedhetaṁ,
monksbhikkhave,
dimensionāyatanaṁ
not to be attained by conditioned phenomenasaṅkhārasamāpattipattabbamakkhāyati;
with a residue of conditioned phenomena it is to be attained, thissaṅkhārāvasesasamāpattipattabbametaṁ,
monksbhikkhave,
dimensionāyatanamakkhāyati.
this, that is‘Tayidaṁ
conditionedsaṅkhataṁ
crudeoḷārikaṁ
there isatthi
indeedkho
butpana
of conditionssaṅkhārānaṁ
cessationnirodho
that is realatthetan’ti—
The Realized One understands this as follows. There are ascetics and brahmins who assert a self that is neither percipient nor non-percipient and healthy after death, describing it as formed, or formless, or both formed and formless, or neither formed nor formless. Some ascetics or brahmins assert the embracing of that dimension merely through the conditioned phenomena of what ought be seen, heard, thought, and known. But that is said to be a disastrous approach. For that dimension is said to be not attainable by means of conditioned phenomena, but only with a residue of conditioned phenomena. ‘All that is conditioned and crude. But there is the cessation of conditions—that is real.’
thusiti having understoodviditvā of thistassa seeing the escapenissaraṇadassāvī the Realized Onetathāgato has gone beyond all thattadupātivatto.
Understanding this and seeing the escape from it, the Realized One has gone beyond all that.
thereTatra,
monksbhikkhave,
whoye
thosete
ascetics and brahminssamaṇabrāhmaṇā
existingsato
of a beingsattassa
annihilationucchedaṁ
eradicationvināsaṁ
nonexistencevibhavaṁ
they assertpaññapenti,
theretatra,
monksbhikkhave,
whoye
thosete
ascetics and brahminssamaṇabrāhmaṇā
percipientsaññiṁ
a selfattānaṁ
they assertpaññapenti
healthyarogaṁ
afterparaṁ
deathmaraṇā
these reject thosetesamete
they rejectpaṭikkosanti,
whoeveryepi
thosete
honorablebhonto
ascetics and brahminssamaṇabrāhmaṇā
non-percipientasaññiṁ
a selfattānaṁ
they assertpaññapenti
healthyarogaṁ
afterparaṁ
deathmaraṇā
these reject thosetesamete
they rejectpaṭikkosanti,
whoeveryepi
thosete
honorablebhonto
ascetics and brahminssamaṇabrāhmaṇā
neither percipient nor non-percipientnevasaññīnāsaññiṁ
a selfattānaṁ
they assertpaññapenti
healthyarogaṁ
afterparaṁ
deathmaraṇā
these reject thosetesamete
they rejectpaṭikkosanti.
thatTaṁ
of whatkissa
reason?hetu?
all theseSabbepime
honorablebhonto
ascetics and brahminssamaṇabrāhmaṇā
upstreamuddhaṁ
flowsaraṁ
only attachmentāsattiṁyeva
they proposeabhivadanti:
thus‘iti
after deathpecca
we shall bebhavissāma,
thusiti
after deathpecca
we shall bebhavissāmā’ti.
Now, the ascetics and brahmins who assert the annihilation, eradication, and nonexistence of an existing being reject those who assert a self that is healthy after death, whether percipient or non-percipient or neither percipient nor non-percipient. Why is that? Because they think: ‘All of those ascetics and brahmins only propose their attachment to heading upstream: “After death we shall be like this! After death we shall be like that!”
‹ Previous · Page 2 of 4 · Next ›
Lite mode — plain HTML for e-readers and old browsers. Full version