Is This What You Think Of Me? · Translation: Bhikkhu Sujato, SuttaCentral
Parallels & more translations on SuttaCentral
well·graspedSuggahitaṁ as well graspedsuggahitato having remembereddhāretvā badly·graspedduggahitaṁ as badly graspedduggahitato having remembereddhāretvā whichyo teachingdhammo whichyo trainingvinayo thatso should be spokenbhāsitabbo.
Remembering this, you should speak on the teaching and the training.
thereTatra
ifce
of youtumhākaṁ
you might think thusevamassa:
of these‘imesaṁ
indeedkho
of venerablesāyasmantānaṁ
in meaningatthato
andceva
together·gosameti
in phrasingbyañjanato
andca
agreessametī’ti,
theretattha
whicheveryaṁ
mendicantbhikkhuṁ
most amenablesuvacataraṁ
you might thinkmaññeyyātha
heso
near·goupasaṅkamitvā
you should say thusevamassa
should be spoken tovacanīyo:
of venerables‘āyasmantānaṁ
indeedkho
in meaningatthato
andceva
agreessameti,
in phrasingbyañjanato
andca
agreessameti.
this·this·thisTadamināpetaṁ
venerablesāyasmanto
you should knowjānātha—
howyathā
in meaningatthato
andceva
together·gosameti
in phrasingbyañjanato
andca
agreessameti.
may the venerables notMāyasmanto
into a disputevivādaṁ
getāpajjitthā’ti.
then of the othersAthāparesaṁ
one side·partisanekatopakkhikānaṁ
of mendicantsbhikkhūnaṁ
whicheveryaṁ
mendicantbhikkhuṁ
most amenablesuvacataraṁ
you might thinkmaññeyyātha
heso
near·goupasaṅkamitvā
you should say thusevamassa
should be spoken tovacanīyo:
of venerables‘āyasmantānaṁ
indeedkho
in meaningatthato
andceva
together·gosameti
in phrasingbyañjanato
andca
agreessameti.
this·this·thisTadamināpetaṁ
venerablesāyasmanto
you should knowjānātha—
howyathā
in meaningatthato
andceva
together·gosameti
in phrasingbyañjanato
andca
agreessameti.
may the venerables notMāyasmanto
into a disputevivādaṁ
getāpajjitthā’ti.
thusIti
well·graspedsuggahitaṁ
as correctly memorizedsuggahitato
should be remembereddhāretabbaṁ.
correctly memorizedSuggahitaṁ
as correctly memorizedsuggahitato
having remembereddhāretvā
whichyo
teachingdhammo
whichyo
trainingvinayo
thatso
should be spokenbhāsitabbo.
Now, you might think, ‘These two venerables agree on both the meaning and the phrasing.’ So you should approach whichever mendicant you think is most amenable and say to them: ‘The venerables agree on both the meaning and the phrasing. But the venerables should know that this is how they come to agree on the meaning and the phrasing. Please don’t get into a dispute about this.’ Then you should approach whichever mendicant they think is most amenable among those who side with the other party and say to them: ‘The venerables agree on both the meaning and the phrasing. But the venerables should know that this is how they come to agree on the meaning and the phrasing. Please don’t get into a dispute about this.’ So you should remember what has been correctly memorized as correctly memorized. Remembering this, you should speak on the teaching and the training.
them·andTesañca for youvo, monksbhikkhave, harmonioussamaggānaṁ together·rejoicesammodamānānaṁ not·apart·speakavivadamānānaṁ trainingsikkhataṁ there might besiyā of a certain oneaññatarassa of a mendicantbhikkhuno an offenseāpatti there might besiyā a transgressionvītikkamo,
As you train in harmony, appreciating each other, without dispute, one of the mendicants might commit an offense or transgression.
theretatra,
monksbhikkhave,
notna
in accusationcodanāya
one should hurrytaritabbaṁ.
individualPuggalo
should be examinedupaparikkhitabbo:
quotation marker‘iti
for me andmayhañca
non-harmingavihesā
will bebhavissati
for the otherparassa
andca
for the individualpuggalassa
non-injuryanupaghāto,
otherparo
forhi
individualpuggalo
not irritableakkodhano
not acrimoniousanupanāhī
not holding fast to viewsadaḷhadiṭṭhī
letting go easilysuppaṭinissaggī,
I am ablesakkomi
and Icāhaṁ
thisetaṁ
individualpuggalaṁ
from the unskillfulakusalā
having drawn awayvuṭṭhāpetvā
in the skillfulkusale
to establishpatiṭṭhāpetun’ti.
ifSace,
monksbhikkhave,
if it is thusevamassa,
appropriatekallaṁ
for speakingvacanāya.
In such a case, you should not be in a hurry to accuse them. The individual should be examined like this: ‘I won’t be troubled and the other individual won’t be hurt, for they’re not irritable and acrimonious. They don’t hold fast to their views, but let them go easily. I can draw them away from the unskillful and establish them in the skillful.’ If that’s what you think, then it’s appropriate to speak to them.
ifSace
butpana,
monksbhikkhave,
it would be thusevamassa:
my‘mayhaṁ
indeedkho
not·without·troubleavihesā
will bebhavissati
of anotherparassa
andca
of the individualpuggalassa
hurtupaghāto,
otherparo
forhi
individualpuggalo
irritablekodhano
acrimoniousupanāhī
not·firm·viewadaḷhadiṭṭhī
letting go easilysuppaṭinissaggī,
I am ablesakkomi
and Icāhaṁ
thisetaṁ
individualpuggalaṁ
not·skillfulakusalā
having drawn awayvuṭṭhāpetvā
in the skillfulkusale
to establishpatiṭṭhāpetuṁ.
a minor matterAppamattakaṁ
indeedkho
but thispanetaṁ
namelyyadidaṁ—parassa
of the individualpuggalassa
hurtupaghāto.
thenAtha
indeedkho
this·veryetadeva
more importantbahutaraṁ—
that Isvāhaṁ
I am ablesakkomi
thisetaṁ
individualpuggalaṁ
not·skillfulakusalā
having drawn awayvuṭṭhāpetvā
in the skillfulkusale
to establishpatiṭṭhāpetun’ti.
ifSace,
monksbhikkhave,
it would be thusevamassa,
appropriatekallaṁ
to speakvacanāya.
But suppose you think this: ‘I will be troubled and the other individual will be hurt, for they’re irritable and acrimonious. However, they don’t hold fast to their views, but let them go easily. I can draw them away from the unskillful and establish them in the skillful. But for the other individual to get hurt is a minor matter. It’s more important that I can draw them away from the unskillful and establish them in the skillful.’ If that’s what you think, then it’s appropriate to speak to them.
ifSace
thenpana,
monksbhikkhave,
it would be thusevamassa:
my‘mayhaṁ
indeedkho
troublevihesā
will bebhavissati
of anotherparassa
andca
of the personpuggalassa
no harmanupaghāto.
the otherParo
forhi
personpuggalo
not·irritableakkodhano
not·acrimoniousanupanāhī
firm·viewdaḷhadiṭṭhī
refusing to let goduppaṭinissaggī,
I am ablesakkomi
and Icāhaṁ
thisetaṁ
personpuggalaṁ
not·skillfulakusalā
having drawn awayvuṭṭhāpetvā
in the skillfulkusale
to establishpatiṭṭhāpetuṁ.
a minor matterAppamattakaṁ
indeedkho
but thispanetaṁ
that-is-to-say + myyadidaṁ—mayhaṁ
troublevihesā.
butAtha
indeedkho
this·veryetadeva
more importantbahutaraṁ—
that + I + Isvāhaṁ
I am ablesakkomi
thisetaṁ
personpuggalaṁ
not·skillfulakusalā
having drawn awayvuṭṭhāpetvā
in the skillfulkusale
to establishpatiṭṭhāpetun’ti.
ifSace,
monksbhikkhave,
it would be thusevamassa,
appropriatekallaṁ
for speakingvacanāya.
But suppose you think this: ‘I will be troubled but the other individual won’t be hurt, for they’re not irritable and acrimonious. However, they hold fast to their views, refusing to let go. Nevertheless, I can draw them away from the unskillful and establish them in the skillful. But for me to be troubled is a minor matter. It’s more important that I can draw them away from the unskillful and establish them in the skillful.’ If that’s what you think, then it’s appropriate to speak to them.
ifSace
thenpana,
monks,bhikkhave,
it would be thus:evamassa:
and for me‘mayhañca
indeedkho
troublevihesā
will bebhavissati
of anotherparassa
andca
of the individualpuggalassa
hurt.upaghāto.
the otherParo
forhi
individualpuggalo
irritablekodhano
acrimoniousupanāhī
holding fast to viewsdaḷhadiṭṭhī
refusing to let go,duppaṭinissaggī,
I am ablesakkomi
and + Icāhaṁ
thisetaṁ
individualpuggalaṁ
from the unskillfulakusalā
having drawn awayvuṭṭhāpetvā
in the skillfulkusale
to establish.patiṭṭhāpetuṁ.
a minorAppamattakaṁ
indeedkho
but thispanetaṁ
that is—and for meyadidaṁ—mayhañca
troublevihesā
will bebhavissati
of anotherparassa
andca
of the individualpuggalassa
hurt.upaghāto.
butAtha
indeedkho
this veryetadeva
more important—bahutaraṁ—
that + Isvāhaṁ
am ablesakkomi
thisetaṁ
individualpuggalaṁ
from the unskillfulakusalā
having drawn awayvuṭṭhāpetvā
in the skillfulkusale
to establish.'patiṭṭhāpetun’ti.
if,Sace,
monks,bhikkhave,
it is thus,evamassa,
appropriatekallaṁ
to speak.vacanāya.
But suppose you think this: ‘I will be troubled and the other individual will be hurt, for they’re irritable and acrimonious. And they hold fast to their views, refusing to let go. Nevertheless, I can draw them away from the unskillful and establish them in the skillful. But for me to be troubled and the other individual to get hurt is a minor matter. It’s more important that I can draw them away from the unskillful and establish them in the skillful.’ If that’s what you think, then it’s appropriate to speak to them.
ifSace
thenpana,
monksbhikkhave,
it might be thusevamassa:
for me indeed‘mayhañca
indeedkho
troublevihesā
will bebhavissati
of the otherparassa
andca
of the individualpuggalassa
harmupaghāto.
the otherParo
forhi
individualpuggalo
irritablekodhano
acrimoniousupanāhī
firm·viewdaḷhadiṭṭhī
refusing to let goduppaṭinissaggī,
notna
and Icāhaṁ
I am ablesakkomi
thisetaṁ
individualpuggalaṁ
from the unskillfulakusalā
having drawn awayvuṭṭhāpetvā
in the skillfulkusale
to establishpatiṭṭhāpetun’ti.
regarding suchEvarūpe,
monksbhikkhave,
individualpuggale
equanimityupekkhā
should not be underestimatednātimaññitabbā.
But suppose you think this: ‘I will be troubled and the other individual will be hurt, for they’re irritable and acrimonious. And they hold fast to their views, refusing to let go. I cannot draw them away from the unskillful and establish them in the skillful.’ Don’t underestimate the value of equanimity regarding such an individual.
they + andTesañca
for youvo,
monksbhikkhave,
harmonioussamaggānaṁ
appreciatingsammodamānānaṁ
not·quarrelavivadamānānaṁ
trainingsikkhataṁ
with each otheraññamaññassa
speech·bringing upvacīsaṁhāro
might ariseuppajjeyya
view·contemptdiṭṭhipaḷāso
of mindcetaso
resentmentāghāto
displeasureappaccayo
exasperationanabhiraddhi.
thereTattha
one side·partisanekatopakkhikānaṁ
of monksbhikkhūnaṁ
whoeveryaṁ
monkbhikkhuṁ
more amenablesuvacataraṁ
you might thinkmaññeyyātha
heso
near·goupasaṅkamitvā
thus + himevamassa
should be saidvacanīyo:
which‘yaṁ
for usno,
reverendāvuso,
of usamhākaṁ
harmonioussamaggānaṁ
appreciatingsammodamānānaṁ
not·quarrelavivadamānānaṁ
trainingsikkhataṁ
with each otheraññamaññassa
speech·bringing upvacīsaṁhāro
arisenuppanno
view·contemptdiṭṭhipaḷāso
of mindcetaso
resentmentāghāto
displeasureappaccayo
exasperationanabhiraddhi,
thattaṁ
knowingjānamāno
asceticsamaṇo
would criticizegaraheyyā’ti.
rightlySammā
answeringbyākaramāno,
monksbhikkhave,
a monkbhikkhu
thusevaṁ
should answerbyākareyya:
which‘yaṁ
for usno,
reverendāvuso,
of usamhākaṁ
harmonioussamaggānaṁ
appreciatingsammodamānānaṁ
not·quarrelavivadamānānaṁ
trainingsikkhataṁ
with each otheraññamaññassa
speech·bringing upvacīsaṁhāro
arisenuppanno
view·contemptdiṭṭhipaḷāso
of mindcetaso
resentmentāghāto
displeasureappaccayo
exasperationanabhiraddhi,
thattaṁ
knowingjānamāno
asceticsamaṇo
would criticizegaraheyyāti.
thisEtaṁ
but, reverendpanāvuso,
qualitydhammaṁ
not having abandonedappahāya
extinguishmentnibbānaṁ
could realizesacchikareyyā’ti.
rightlySammā
answeringbyākaramāno,
monksbhikkhave,
a monkbhikkhu
thusevaṁ
should answerbyākareyya:
this‘etaṁ,
reverendāvuso,
qualitydhammaṁ
not having abandonedappahāya
notna
extinguishmentnibbānaṁ
could realizesacchikareyyā’ti.
As you train in harmony, appreciating each other, without quarreling, the sides might continue to bring up settled issues with each other, with contempt for each other’s views, resentful, bitter, and exasperated. In this case you should approach whichever mendicant you think is most amenable among those who side with one party and say to them: ‘Reverend, as we were training, the sides continued to bring up settled issues with each other. If the Ascetic knew about this, would he criticize it?’ Answering rightly, the mendicant should say: ‘Yes, reverend, he would.’ ‘But without giving that up, reverend, can one realize extinguishment?’ Answering rightly, the mendicant should say: ‘No, reverend, one cannot.’
then of the othersAthāparesaṁ
on one side·sidingekatopakkhikānaṁ
of the monksbhikkhūnaṁ
whicheveryaṁ
monkbhikkhuṁ
most amenablesuvacataraṁ
you all would thinkmaññeyyātha,
heso
near·goupasaṅkamitvā
thus + to himevamassa
to be saidvacanīyo:
which‘yaṁ
for usno,
reverendāvuso,
of usamhākaṁ
of those unitedsamaggānaṁ
together·rejoicesammodamānānaṁ
not·disputeavivadamānānaṁ
of those trainingsikkhataṁ
for each otheraññamaññassa
speech·disputevacīsaṁhāro
arisenuppanno
view·rigiditydiṭṭhipaḷāso
of mindcetaso
angerāghāto
discontentappaccayo
displeasureanabhiraddhi,
thattaṁ
knowingjānamāno
the Asceticsamaṇo
would criticizegaraheyyā’ti.
rightlySammā
answeringbyākaramāno,
monksbhikkhave,
a monkbhikkhu
thusevaṁ
would answerbyākareyya:
which‘yaṁ
for usno,
reverendāvuso,
of usamhākaṁ
of those unitedsamaggānaṁ
together·rejoicesammodamānānaṁ
not·disputeavivadamānānaṁ
of those trainingsikkhataṁ
for each otheraññamaññassa
speech·disputevacīsaṁhāro
arisenuppanno
view·rigiditydiṭṭhipaḷāso
of mindcetaso
angerāghāto
discontentappaccayo
displeasureanabhiraddhi
thattaṁ
knowingjānamāno
the Asceticsamaṇo
would criticizegaraheyyāti.
but thisEtaṁ
and reverendpanāvuso,
dhammadhammaṁ
not·abandoningappahāya
nibbānanibbānaṁ
would realizesacchikareyyā’ti.
rightlySammā
answeringbyākaramāno,
monksbhikkhave,
a monkbhikkhu
thusevaṁ
would answerbyākareyya:
this‘etaṁ
indeedkho,
reverendāvuso,
dhammadhammaṁ
not·abandoningappahāya
notna
nibbānanibbānaṁ
would realizesacchikareyyā’ti.
Then you should approach whichever mendicant they think is most amenable among those who side with the other party and say to them: ‘Reverend, as we were training, the sides continued to bring up settled issues with each other. If the Ascetic knew about this, would he criticize it?’ Answering rightly, the mendicant should say: ‘Yes, reverend, he would.’ ‘But without giving that up, reverend, can one realize extinguishment?’ Answering rightly, the mendicant should say: ‘No, reverend, one cannot.’
that·ifTañce,
O mendicantsbhikkhave,
mendicantbhikkhuṁ
otherspare
thusevaṁ
should askpuccheyyuṁ:
by the venerable‘āyasmatā
indeedno
theseete
mendicantsbhikkhū
not·skillfulakusalā
having drawn awayvuṭṭhāpetvā
in the skillfulkusale
established?patiṭṭhāpitā’ti?
rightlySammā
explain·dobyākaramāno,
O mendicantsbhikkhave,
mendicantbhikkhu
thusevaṁ
explain·dobyākareyya:
here I‘idhāhaṁ,
reverendsāvuso,
whereyena
the Blessed Onebhagavā
him + approachtenupasaṅkamiṁ,
to metassa
meme
the Blessed Onebhagavā
the Dhammadhammaṁ
taughtdesesi,
that·Itāhaṁ
the Dhammadhammaṁ
having heardsutvā
to thosetesaṁ
mendicantsbhikkhūnaṁ
I explainedabhāsiṁ.
thatTaṁ
thosete
mendicantsbhikkhū
the Dhammadhammaṁ
having heardsutvā
not·skillfulakusalā
they were drawn awayvuṭṭhahiṁsu,
in the skillfulkusale
they were established'patiṭṭhahiṁsū’ti.
thusEvaṁ
explain·dobyākaramāno
indeedkho,
O mendicantsbhikkhave,
a mendicantbhikkhu
notna
andceva
himselfattānaṁ
does not glorifyukkaṁseti,
notna
anotherparaṁ
does not put downvambheti,
of the Dhammadhammassa
and + in accordance with Dhammacānudhammaṁ
explain·dobyākaroti,
notna
andca
anykoci
together·Dhammasahadhammiko
assertion + criticismvādānuvādo
blameworthygārayhaṁ
groundṭhānaṁ
comes toāgacchatī”ti.
this + saidIdamavoca
the Blessed Onebhagavā.
satisfiedAttamanā
thosete
mendicantsbhikkhū
of the Blessed Onebhagavato
the speechbhāsitaṁ
approvedabhinandunti.
Kinti SuttaKintisuttaṁ
finishedniṭṭhitaṁ
thirdtatiyaṁ.
If others should ask that mendicant: ‘Were you the venerable who drew those mendicants away from the unskillful and established them in the skillful?’ Answering rightly, the mendicant should say: ‘Well, reverends, I approached the Buddha. He taught me the Dhamma. After hearing that teaching I explained it to those mendicants. When those mendicants heard that teaching they were drawn away from the unskillful and established in the skillful.’ Answering in this way, that mendicant doesn’t glorify themselves or put others down. They answer in line with the teaching, with no legitimate grounds for rebuttal and criticism.” That is what the Buddha said. Satisfied, the mendicants approved what the Buddha said.
‹ Previous · Page 2 of 2
Lite mode — plain HTML for e-readers and old browsers. Full version