What Should and Should Not Be Cultivated · Translation: Bhikkhu Sujato, SuttaCentral
Parallels & more translations on SuttaCentral
Imassa kho ahaṁ, bhante, bhagavatā saṅkhittena bhāsitassa, vitthārena atthaṁ avibhattassa, evaṁ vitthārena atthaṁ ājānāmī”ti.
Sir, that’s how I understand the detailed meaning of the Buddha’s brief statement.”
“Sādhu
sādhu,
sāriputta.
Sādhu
kho
tvaṁ,
sāriputta,
imassa
mayā
saṅkhittena
bhāsitassa,
vitthārena
atthaṁ
avibhattassa,
evaṁ
vitthārena
atthaṁ
ājānāsi.
“Good, good, Sāriputta! It’s good that you understand the detailed meaning of my brief statement in this way.”
‘Kāyasamācārampāhaṁ,
bhikkhave,
duvidhena
vadāmi—
sevitabbampi,
asevitabbampi;
tañca
aññamaññaṁ
kāyasamācāran’ti—
iti
kho
panetaṁ
vuttaṁ
mayā.
Kiñcetaṁ
paṭicca
vuttaṁ?
Yathārūpaṁ,
sāriputta,
kāyasamācāraṁ
sevato
akusalā
dhammā
abhivaḍḍhanti,
kusalā
dhammā
parihāyanti
evarūpo
kāyasamācāro
na
sevitabbo;
yathārūpañca
kho,
sāriputta,
kāyasamācāraṁ
sevato
akusalā
dhammā
parihāyanti,
kusalā
dhammā
abhivaḍḍhanti—
evarūpo
kāyasamācāro
sevitabbo.
And the Buddha went on to repeat and endorse Venerable Sāriputta’s explanation in full. Then he went on to explain further:
Kathaṁrūpaṁ,
sāriputta,
kāyasamācāraṁ
sevato
akusalā
dhammā
abhivaḍḍhanti,
kusalā
dhammā
parihāyanti?
Idha,
sāriputta,
ekacco
pāṇātipātī
hoti
luddo
lohitapāṇi
hatappahate
niviṭṭho
adayāpanno
pāṇabhūtesu;
adinnādāyī
kho
pana
hoti,
yaṁ
taṁ
parassa
paravittūpakaraṇaṁ
gāmagataṁ
vā
araññagataṁ
vā
taṁ
adinnaṁ
theyyasaṅkhātaṁ
ādātā
hoti;
kāmesumicchācārī
kho
pana
hoti,
yā
tā
māturakkhitā
piturakkhitā
mātāpiturakkhitā
bhāturakkhitā
bhaginirakkhitā
ñātirakkhitā
gottarakkhitā
dhammarakkhitā
sassāmikā
saparidaṇḍā
antamaso
mālāguḷaparikkhittāpi
tathārūpāsu
cārittaṁ
āpajjitā
hoti—
evarūpaṁ,
sāriputta,
kāyasamācāraṁ
sevato
akusalā
dhammā
abhivaḍḍhanti,
kusalā
dhammā
parihāyanti.
Sāriputta, what kind of bodily conduct does one practise such that unwholesome states increase and wholesome states decline? Here, Sāriputta, some person is one who kills living beings, cruel, bloody-handed, given to striking and killing, established without compassion toward living beings. Further, he is one who takes what is not given: whatever property and belongings of another, whether in a village or in a forest, he takes it not given, reckoned as theft. Further, he is one who misconducts himself in sensual pleasures: whoever those women are — protected by mother, protected by father, protected by mother and father, protected by brother, protected by sister, protected by relatives, protected by clan, protected by dhamma, having a husband, subject to punishment, even one adorned with a garland — he engages in misconduct with such women. Sāriputta, it is such bodily conduct that one practises such that unwholesome states increase and wholesome states decline.
Kathaṁrūpaṁ,
sāriputta,
kāyasamācāraṁ
sevato
akusalā
dhammā
parihāyanti,
kusalā
dhammā
abhivaḍḍhanti?
Idha,
sāriputta,
ekacco
pāṇātipātaṁ
pahāya
pāṇātipātā
paṭivirato
hoti
nihitadaṇḍo
nihitasattho,
lajjī
dayāpanno
sabbapāṇabhūtahitānukampī
viharati;
adinnādānaṁ
pahāya
adinnādānā
paṭivirato
hoti,
yaṁ
taṁ
parassa
paravittūpakaraṇaṁ
gāmagataṁ
vā
araññagataṁ
vā
taṁ
nādinnaṁ
theyyasaṅkhātaṁ
ādātā
hoti;
kāmesumicchācāraṁ
pahāya
kāmesumicchācārā
paṭivirato
hoti,
yā
tā
māturakkhitā
piturakkhitā
mātāpiturakkhitā
bhāturakkhitā
bhaginirakkhitā
ñātirakkhitā
gottarakkhitā
dhammarakkhitā
sassāmikā
saparidaṇḍā
antamaso
mālāguḷaparikkhittāpi
tathārūpāsu
na
cārittaṁ
āpajjitā
hoti—
evarūpaṁ,
sāriputta,
kāyasamācāraṁ
sevato
akusalā
dhammā
parihāyanti,
kusalā
dhammā
abhivaḍḍhanti.
‘Kāyasamācārampāhaṁ,
bhikkhave,
duvidhena
vadāmi—
sevitabbampi,
asevitabbampi;
tañca
aññamaññaṁ
kāyasamācāran’ti—
iti
yaṁ
taṁ
vuttaṁ
mayā
idametaṁ
paṭicca
vuttaṁ.
Sāriputta, for one practicing what kind of bodily conduct do unwholesome states decline and wholesome states increase? Here, Sāriputta, some person, having abandoned killing living beings, abstains from killing living beings; he has laid down the rod, laid down the weapon, is conscientious, full of compassion, and dwells compassionate for the welfare of all living beings. Having abandoned taking what is not given, he abstains from taking what is not given; whatever is another's property and belongings, whether in the village or in the forest, he is not one who takes what is not given reckoned as theft. Having abandoned sexual misconduct, he abstains from sexual misconduct; he is not one who commits sexual intercourse with women protected by mother, protected by father, protected by mother and father, protected by brother, protected by sister, protected by relatives, protected by clan, protected by dhamma, those with a husband, those subject to punishment, even those adorned with flower garlands—Sāriputta, for one practicing such bodily conduct, unwholesome states decline and wholesome states increase. Monks, I say that bodily conduct is of two kinds—to be cultivated and not to be cultivated; and that bodily conduct is mutually exclusive. Thus, whatever was said by me, this was said with reference to that.
Vacīsamācārampāhaṁ,
bhikkhave,
duvidhena
vadāmi
…pe…
manosamācārampāhaṁ,
bhikkhave,
duvidhena
vadāmi
…pe…
cittuppādampāhaṁ,
bhikkhave,
duvidhena
vadāmi
…pe…
saññāpaṭilābhampāhaṁ,
bhikkhave,
duvidhena
vadāmi
…pe…
diṭṭhipaṭilābhampāhaṁ,
bhikkhave,
duvidhena
vadāmi
…pe….
Verbal conduct too, monks, I say is twofold … mental conduct too, monks, I say is twofold … the arising of thought too, monks, I say is twofold … the acquisition of perception too, monks, I say is twofold … the acquisition of view too, monks, I say is twofold …
‘Attabhāvapaṭilābhampāhaṁ,
bhikkhave,
duvidhena
vadāmi—
sevitabbampi,
asevitabbampi;
tañca
aññamaññaṁ
attabhāvapaṭilābhan’ti—
iti
kho
panetaṁ
vuttaṁ
mayā.
Kiñcetaṁ
paṭicca
vuttaṁ?
Yathārūpaṁ,
sāriputta,
attabhāvapaṭilābhaṁ
sevato
akusalā
dhammā
abhivaḍḍhanti,
kusalā
dhammā
parihāyanti
evarūpo
attabhāvapaṭilābho
na
sevitabbo;
yathārūpañca
kho,
sāriputta,
attabhāvapaṭilābhaṁ
sevato
akusalā
dhammā
parihāyanti,
kusalā
dhammā
abhivaḍḍhanti—
evarūpo
attabhāvapaṭilābho
sevitabbo.
“An acquisition of selfhood, monks, I say, is of two kinds: to be cultivated and not to be cultivated; and these are mutually exclusive acquisitions of selfhood.” That is indeed what was said by me. But with reference to what was it said? Sāriputta, when for one cultivating an acquisition of selfhood unwholesome states increase and wholesome states decline, such an acquisition of selfhood should not be cultivated. But when, Sāriputta, for one cultivating an acquisition of selfhood unwholesome states decline and wholesome states increase, such an acquisition of selfhood should be cultivated.
Kathaṁrūpaṁ,
sāriputta,
attabhāvapaṭilābhaṁ
sevato
akusalā
dhammā
abhivaḍḍhanti,
kusalā
dhammā
parihāyanti?
Sabyābajjhaṁ,
sāriputta,
attabhāvapaṭilābhaṁ
abhinibbattayato
apariniṭṭhitabhāvāya
akusalā
dhammā
abhivaḍḍhanti,
kusalā
dhammā
parihāyanti;
abyābajjhaṁ,
sāriputta,
attabhāvapaṭilābhaṁ
abhinibbattayato
pariniṭṭhitabhāvāya
akusalā
dhammā
parihāyanti,
kusalā
dhammā
abhivaḍḍhanti.
‘Attabhāvapaṭilābhampāhaṁ,
bhikkhave,
duvidhena
vadāmi—
sevitabbampi,
asevitabbampi;
tañca
aññamaññaṁ
attabhāvapaṭilābhan’ti—
iti
yaṁ
taṁ
vuttaṁ
mayā
idametaṁ
paṭicca
vuttaṁ.
Imassa
kho,
sāriputta,
mayā
saṅkhittena
bhāsitassa
evaṁ
vitthārena
attho
daṭṭhabbo.
What kind of personal existence, Sāriputta, when cultivated, causes unwholesome mental states to increase and wholesome mental states to decline? Sāriputta, generating a personal existence with affliction, for the sake of an unfinished state, unwholesome mental states increase and wholesome mental states decline; generating a personal existence without affliction, for the sake of a finished state, unwholesome mental states decline and wholesome mental states increase. Monks, I say that a personal existence is twofold: it should be cultivated and it should not be cultivated; and this is mutually a kind of personal existence—so when that was said by me, it was said on account of this. Sāriputta, the meaning of what I have spoken about in brief should be seen in detail in this way.
Cakkhuviññeyyaṁ
rūpampāhaṁ,
sāriputta,
duvidhena
vadāmi—
sevitabbampi,
asevitabbampi;
sotaviññeyyaṁ
saddampāhaṁ,
sāriputta,
duvidhena
vadāmi—
sevitabbampi
asevitabbampi;
ghānaviññeyyaṁ
gandhampāhaṁ,
sāriputta,
duvidhena
vadāmi—
sevitabbampi,
asevitabbampi;
jivhāviññeyyaṁ
rasampāhaṁ,
sāriputta,
duvidhena
vadāmi—
sevitabbampi,
asevitabbampi;
kāyaviññeyyaṁ
phoṭṭhabbampāhaṁ,
sāriputta,
duvidhena
vadāmi—
sevitabbampi,
asevitabbampi;
manoviññeyyaṁ
dhammampāhaṁ,
sāriputta,
duvidhena
vadāmi—
sevitabbampi,
asevitabbampī”ti.
“I say that there are two kinds of sight known by the eye: that which you should cultivate, and that which you should not cultivate. I say that there are two kinds of sound known by the ear … two kinds of smell known by the nose … two kinds of taste known by the tongue … two kinds of touch known by the body … two kinds of idea known by the mind: that which you should cultivate, and that which you should not cultivate.”
‹ Previous · Page 4 of 6 · Next ›
Lite mode — plain HTML for e-readers and old browsers. Full version