Many Elements · Translation: Bhikkhu Sujato, SuttaCentral
Parallels & more translations on SuttaCentral
“Kittāvatā
pana,
bhante,
‘paṭiccasamuppādakusalo
bhikkhū’ti
alaṁvacanāyā”ti?
“Idhānanda,
bhikkhu
evaṁ
pajānāti:
‘imasmiṁ
sati
idaṁ
hoti,
imassuppādā
idaṁ
uppajjati,
imasmiṁ
asati
idaṁ
na
hoti,
imassa
nirodhā
idaṁ
nirujjhati,
yadidaṁ—
avijjāpaccayā
saṅkhārā,
saṅkhārapaccayā
viññāṇaṁ,
viññāṇapaccayā
nāmarūpaṁ,
nāmarūpapaccayā
saḷāyatanaṁ,
saḷāyatanapaccayā
phasso,
phassapaccayā
vedanā,
vedanāpaccayā
taṇhā,
taṇhāpaccayā
upādānaṁ,
upādānapaccayā
bhavo,
bhavapaccayā
jāti,
jātipaccayā
jarāmaraṇaṁ
sokaparidevadukkhadomanassūpāyāsā
sambhavanti.
Evametassa
kevalassa
dukkhakkhandhassa
samudayo
hoti.
Avijjāya
tveva
asesavirāganirodhā
saṅkhāranirodho,
saṅkhāranirodhā
viññāṇanirodho,
viññāṇanirodhā
nāmarūpanirodho,
nāmarūpanirodhā
saḷāyatananirodho,
saḷāyatananirodhā
phassanirodho,
phassanirodhā
vedanānirodho,
vedanānirodhā
taṇhānirodho,
taṇhānirodhā
upādānanirodho,
upādānanirodhā
bhavanirodho,
bhavanirodhā
jātinirodho,
jātinirodhā
jarāmaraṇaṁ
sokaparidevadukkhadomanassūpāyāsā
nirujjhanti.
Evametassa
kevalassa
dukkhakkhandhassa
nirodho
hoti’.
Ettāvatā
kho,
ānanda,
‘paṭiccasamuppādakusalo
bhikkhū’ti
alaṁvacanāyā”ti.
“But sir, how is a mendicant qualified to be called ‘skilled in dependent origination’?” “It’s when a mendicant understands: ‘When this exists, this comes to be; due to the arising of this, this arises. When this doesn’t exist, this doesn’t come to be; due to the cessation of this, this ceases. That is: ignorance is a requirement for choices. Choices are a condition for consciousness. Consciousness is a requirement for name and form. Name and form are requirements for the six sense fields. The six sense fields are requirements for contact. Contact is a requirement for feeling. Feeling is a requirement for craving. Craving is a requirement for grasping. Grasping is a requirement for continued existence. Continued existence is a requirement for rebirth. Rebirth is a requirement for old age and death, sorrow, lamentation, pain, sadness, and distress to come to be. That is how this entire mass of suffering originates. When ignorance fades away and ceases no residue left behind, choices cease. When choices cease, consciousness ceases. When consciousness ceases, name and form cease. When name and form cease, the six sense fields cease. When the six sense fields cease, contact ceases. When contact ceases, feeling ceases. When feeling ceases, craving ceases. When craving ceases, grasping ceases. When grasping ceases, continued existence ceases. When continued existence ceases, rebirth ceases. When rebirth ceases, old age and death, sorrow, lamentation, pain, sadness, and distress cease. That is how this entire mass of suffering ceases.’ That’s how a mendicant is qualified to be called ‘skilled in dependent origination’.”
“Kittāvatā
pana,
bhante,
‘ṭhānāṭhānakusalo
bhikkhū’ti
alaṁvacanāyā”ti?
“Idhānanda,
bhikkhu
‘aṭṭhānametaṁ
anavakāso
yaṁ
diṭṭhisampanno
puggalo
kañci
saṅkhāraṁ
niccato
upagaccheyya,
netaṁ
ṭhānaṁ
vijjatī’ti
pajānāti;
‘ṭhānañca
kho
etaṁ
vijjati
yaṁ
puthujjano
kañci
saṅkhāraṁ
niccato
upagaccheyya,
ṭhānametaṁ
vijjatī’ti
pajānāti;
‘aṭṭhānametaṁ
anavakāso
yaṁ
diṭṭhisampanno
puggalo
kañci
saṅkhāraṁ
sukhato
upagaccheyya,
netaṁ
ṭhānaṁ
vijjatī’ti
pajānāti;
‘ṭhānañca
kho
etaṁ
vijjati
yaṁ
puthujjano
kañci
saṅkhāraṁ
sukhato
upagaccheyya,
ṭhānametaṁ
vijjatī’ti
pajānāti.
‘Aṭṭhānametaṁ
anavakāso
yaṁ
diṭṭhisampanno
puggalo
kañci
dhammaṁ
attato
upagaccheyya,
netaṁ
ṭhānaṁ
vijjatī’ti
pajānāti,
‘ṭhānañca
kho
etaṁ
vijjati
yaṁ
puthujjano
kañci
dhammaṁ
attato
upagaccheyya,
ṭhānametaṁ
vijjatī’ti
pajānāti.
“But sir, how is a mendicant qualified to be called ‘skilled in the possible and impossible’?” “It’s when a mendicant understands: ‘It’s impossible for an individual accomplished in view to take any condition as permanent. That is not possible. But it’s possible for an ordinary person to take some condition as permanent. That is possible.’ They understand: ‘It’s impossible for an individual accomplished in view to take any condition as pleasant. But it’s possible for an ordinary person to take some condition as pleasant.’ They understand: ‘It’s impossible for an individual accomplished in view to take anything as self. But it’s possible for an ordinary person to take something as self.’
‘Aṭṭhānametaṁ
anavakāso
yaṁ
diṭṭhisampanno
puggalo
mātaraṁ
jīvitā
voropeyya,
netaṁ
ṭhānaṁ
vijjatī’ti
pajānāti;
‘ṭhānañca
kho
etaṁ
vijjati
yaṁ
puthujjano
mātaraṁ
jīvitā
voropeyya,
ṭhānametaṁ
vijjatī’ti
pajānāti.
‘Aṭṭhānametaṁ
anavakāso
yaṁ
diṭṭhisampanno
puggalo
pitaraṁ
jīvitā
voropeyya
…pe…
arahantaṁ
jīvitā
voropeyya,
ṭhānametaṁ
vijjatī’ti
pajānāti;
‘aṭṭhānametaṁ
anavakāso
yaṁ
diṭṭhisampanno
puggalo
duṭṭhacitto
tathāgatassa
lohitaṁ
uppādeyya,
netaṁ
ṭhānaṁ
vijjatī’ti
pajānāti;
‘ṭhānañca
kho
etaṁ
vijjati
yaṁ
puthujjano
duṭṭhacitto
tathāgatassa
lohitaṁ
uppādeyya,
ṭhānametaṁ
vijjatī’ti
pajānāti.
‘Aṭṭhānametaṁ
anavakāso
yaṁ
diṭṭhisampanno
puggalo
saṅghaṁ
bhindeyya,
netaṁ
ṭhānaṁ
vijjatī’ti
pajānāti;
‘ṭhānañca
kho
etaṁ
vijjati
yaṁ
puthujjano
saṅghaṁ
bhindeyya,
ṭhānametaṁ
vijjatī’ti
pajānāti.
‘Aṭṭhānametaṁ
anavakāso
yaṁ
diṭṭhisampanno
puggalo
aññaṁ
satthāraṁ
uddiseyya,
netaṁ
ṭhānaṁ
vijjatī’ti
pajānāti;
They understand: ‘It’s impossible for an individual accomplished in view to murder their mother. But it’s possible for an ordinary person to murder their mother.’ They understand: ‘It’s impossible for an individual accomplished in view to murder their father … or murder a perfected one. But it’s possible for an ordinary person to murder their father … or murder a perfected one.’ They understand: ‘It’s impossible for an individual accomplished in view to injure a Realized One with malicious intent. But it’s possible for an ordinary person to injure a Realized One with malicious intent.’ They understand: ‘It’s impossible for an individual accomplished in view to cause a schism in the Saṅgha. But it’s possible for an ordinary person to cause a schism in the Saṅgha.’ They understand: ‘It’s impossible for an individual accomplished in view to dedicate themselves to another teacher.
‘ṭhānañca kho etaṁ vijjati yaṁ puthujjano aññaṁ satthāraṁ uddiseyya, ṭhānametaṁ vijjatī’ti pajānāti.
But it’s possible for an ordinary person to dedicate themselves to another teacher.’
‘Aṭṭhānametaṁ
anavakāso
yaṁ
ekissā
lokadhātuyā
dve
arahanto
sammāsambuddhā
apubbaṁ
acarimaṁ
uppajjeyyuṁ,
netaṁ
ṭhānaṁ
vijjatī’ti
pajānāti;
‘ṭhānañca
kho
etaṁ
vijjati
yaṁ
ekissā
lokadhātuyā
eko
arahaṁ
sammāsambuddho
uppajjeyya,
ṭhānametaṁ
vijjatī’ti
pajānāti.
‘Aṭṭhānametaṁ
anavakāso
yaṁ
ekissā
lokadhātuyā
dve
rājāno
cakkavattino
apubbaṁ
acarimaṁ
uppajjeyyuṁ,
netaṁ
ṭhānaṁ
vijjatī’ti
pajānāti;
‘ṭhānañca
kho
etaṁ
vijjati
yaṁ
ekissā
lokadhātuyā
eko
rājā
cakkavattī
uppajjeyya,
ṭhānametaṁ
vijjatī’ti
pajānāti.
They understand: ‘It’s impossible for two perfected ones, fully awakened Buddhas to arise in the same solar system at the same time. But it is possible for just one perfected one, a fully awakened Buddha, to arise in one solar system.’ They understand: ‘It’s impossible for two wheel-turning monarchs to arise in the same solar system at the same time. But it is possible for just one wheel-turning monarch to arise in one solar system.’
‘Aṭṭhānametaṁ
anavakāso
yaṁ
itthī
arahaṁ
assa
sammāsambuddho,
netaṁ
ṭhānaṁ
vijjatī’ti
pajānāti;
‘ṭhānañca
kho
etaṁ
vijjati
yaṁ
puriso
arahaṁ
assa
sammāsambuddho,
ṭhānametaṁ
vijjatī’ti
pajānāti.
‘Aṭṭhānametaṁ
anavakāso
yaṁ
itthī
rājā
assa
cakkavattī,
netaṁ
ṭhānaṁ
vijjatī’ti
pajānāti;
‘ṭhānañca
kho
etaṁ
vijjati
yaṁ
puriso
rājā
assa
cakkavattī,
ṭhānametaṁ
vijjatī’ti
pajānāti.
‘Aṭṭhānametaṁ
anavakāso
yaṁ
itthī
sakkattaṁ
kareyya
…
mārattaṁ
kareyya
…
brahmattaṁ
kareyya,
netaṁ
ṭhānaṁ
vijjatī’ti
pajānāti;
‘ṭhānañca
kho
etaṁ
vijjati
yaṁ
puriso
sakkattaṁ
kareyya
…
mārattaṁ
kareyya
…
brahmattaṁ
kareyya,
ṭhānametaṁ
vijjatī’ti
pajānāti.
They understand: ‘It’s impossible for a woman to be a perfected one, a fully awakened Buddha. But it is possible for a man to be a perfected one, a fully awakened Buddha.’ They understand: ‘It’s impossible for a woman to be a wheel-turning monarch. But it is possible for a man to be a wheel-turning monarch.’ They understand: ‘It’s impossible for a woman to perform the role of Sakka, Māra, or the Divinity. But it is possible for a man to perform the role of Sakka, Māra, or the Divinity.’
‹ Previous · Page 2 of 3 · Next ›
Lite mode — plain HTML for e-readers and old browsers. Full version