sutta.stream

‹ Library

Majjhima Nikāya 11

Cūḷasīhanādasutta

The Shorter Discourse on the Lion’s Roar · Translation: Bhikkhu Sujato, SuttaCentral

Parallels & more translations on SuttaCentral

Glosses: Fluent · Literal · Off
Translation: Hide · Show

Tap any word for its dictionary entry.

these twoDvemā, monksbhikkhave, viewsdiṭṭhiyo—
view of existencebhavadiṭṭhi andca view of nonexistencevibhavadiṭṭhi andca.
whoeverYe forhi anykeci, monksbhikkhave, asceticssamaṇā or brahminsbrāhmaṇā or the view of existencebhavadiṭṭhiṁ clinging toallīnā the view of existencebhavadiṭṭhiṁ resorting toupagatā the view of existencebhavadiṭṭhiṁ attached toajjhositā, the view of nonexistencevibhavadiṭṭhiyā theyte opposepaṭiviruddhā.
whoeverYe forhi anykeci, monksbhikkhave, asceticssamaṇā or brahminsbrāhmaṇā or the view of nonexistencevibhavadiṭṭhiṁ clinging toallīnā the view of nonexistencevibhavadiṭṭhiṁ resorting toupagatā the view of nonexistencevibhavadiṭṭhiṁ attached toajjhositā, the view of existencebhavadiṭṭhiyā theyte opposepaṭiviruddhā.

Mendicants, there are these two views: views favoring existence and views favoring nonexistence. Any ascetics or brahmins who resort to, draw near to, and cling to a view favoring existence will oppose a view favoring nonexistence. Any ascetics or brahmins who resort to, draw near to, and cling to a view favoring nonexistence will oppose a view favoring existence.

whoeverYe forhi anykeci, monksbhikkhave, asceticssamaṇā or brahminsbrāhmaṇā or of theseimāsaṁ twodvinnaṁ viewsdiṭṭhīnaṁ origin andsamudayañca disappearance andatthaṅgamañca gratification andassādañca drawback andādīnavañca escape andnissaraṇañca as it really isyathābhūtaṁ do not understandnappajānanti, theyte with greedsarāgā theyte with hatesadosā theyte with delusionsamohā theyte with cravingsataṇhā theyte with graspingsaupādānā theyte unwiseaviddasuno theyte favoring and opposinganuruddhappaṭiviruddhā theyte delighting in proliferationpapañcārāmā enjoying proliferationpapañcaratino;
theyte notna are freedparimuccanti from birthjātiyā from old agejarāya from deathmaraṇena from sorrowssokehi from lamentationsparidevehi from painsdukkhehi from sadnessdomanassehi from distressupāyāsehi;
not‘na are freedparimuccanti from suffering (quote)dukkhasmā’ti I sayvadāmi.

There are some ascetics and brahmins who don’t truly understand these two views’ origin, disappearance, gratification, drawback, and escape. They’re greedy, hateful, delusional, craving, grasping, and ignorant. They favor and oppose, and they enjoy proliferation. They’re not freed from rebirth, old age, and death, from sorrow, lamentation, pain, sadness, and distress. They’re not freed from suffering, I say.

whoeverYe andca indeedkho anykeci, monksbhikkhave, asceticssamaṇā or brahminsbrāhmaṇā or of theseimāsaṁ twodvinnaṁ viewsdiṭṭhīnaṁ origin andsamudayañca disappearance andatthaṅgamañca gratification andassādañca drawback andādīnavañca escape andnissaraṇañca as it really isyathābhūtaṁ do understandpajānanti, theyte free of greedvītarāgā theyte free of hatevītadosā theyte free of delusionvītamohā theyte free of cravingvītataṇhā theyte without graspinganupādānā theyte wiseviddasuno theyte neither favoring nor opposingananuruddhaappaṭiviruddhā theyte delighting in non-proliferationnippapañcārāmā enjoying non-proliferationnippapañcaratino;
theyte are freedparimuccanti from birthjātiyā from old agejarāya from deathmaraṇena from sorrowssokehi from lamentationsparidevehi from painsdukkhehi from sadnessdomanassehi from distressupāyāsehi;
are freed‘parimuccanti from suffering (quote)dukkhasmā’ti I sayvadāmi.

There are some ascetics and brahmins who do truly understand these two views’ origin, disappearance, gratification, drawback, and escape. They’re rid of greed, hate, delusion, craving, grasping, and ignorance. They don’t favor and oppose, and they enjoy non-proliferation. They’re freed from rebirth, old age, and death, from sorrow, lamentation, pain, sadness, and distress. They’re freed from suffering, I say.

these fourCattārimāni, monksbhikkhave, graspingsupādānāni.
whichKatamāni four?cattāri?
grasping at sensual pleasuresKāmupādānaṁ, grasping at viewsdiṭṭhupādānaṁ, grasping at precepts and observancessīlabbatupādānaṁ, grasping at theories of a selfattavādupādānaṁ.

There are these four kinds of grasping. What four? Grasping at sensual pleasures, views, precepts and observances, and theories of a self.

there areSanti, monksbhikkhave, someeke ascetics and brahminssamaṇabrāhmaṇā claiming full understanding of all graspingsabbupādānapariññāvādā professingpaṭijānamānā.
theyTe notna rightlysammā full understanding of all graspingsabbupādānapariññaṁ describepaññapenti—
of grasping at sensual pleasureskāmupādānassa full understandingpariññaṁ they describepaññapenti, notna of grasping at viewsdiṭṭhupādānassa full understandingpariññaṁ they describepaññapenti, notna of grasping at precepts and observancessīlabbatupādānassa full understandingpariññaṁ they describepaññapenti, notna of grasping at theories of a selfattavādupādānassa full understandingpariññaṁ they describepaññapenti.
thatTaṁ of whatkissa reason?hetu?
theseImāni forhi thosete gentlemenbhonto ascetics and brahminssamaṇabrāhmaṇā threetīṇi thingsṭhānāni as it really isyathābhūtaṁ do not understandnappajānanti.
thereforeTasmā thosete gentlemenbhonto ascetics and brahminssamaṇabrāhmaṇā claiming full understanding of all graspingsabbupādānapariññāvādā professingpaṭijānamānā;
theyte notna rightlysammā full understanding of all graspingsabbupādānapariññaṁ describepaññapenti—
of grasping at sensual pleasureskāmupādānassa full understandingpariññaṁ they describepaññapenti, notna of grasping at viewsdiṭṭhupādānassa full understandingpariññaṁ they describepaññapenti, notna of grasping at precepts and observancessīlabbatupādānassa full understandingpariññaṁ they describepaññapenti, notna of grasping at theories of a selfattavādupādānassa full understandingpariññaṁ they describepaññapenti.

There are some ascetics and brahmins who claim to propound the complete understanding of all kinds of grasping. But they don’t correctly describe the complete understanding of all kinds of grasping. They describe the complete understanding of grasping at sensual pleasures, but not views, precepts and observances, and theories of a self. Why is that? Because those gentlemen don’t truly understand these three things. That’s why they claim to propound the complete understanding of all kinds of grasping, but they don’t really.

there areSanti, monksbhikkhave, someeke ascetics and brahminssamaṇabrāhmaṇā claiming full understanding of all graspingsabbupādānapariññāvādā professingpaṭijānamānā.
theyTe notna rightlysammā full understanding of all graspingsabbupādānapariññaṁ describepaññapenti—
of grasping at sensual pleasureskāmupādānassa full understandingpariññaṁ they describepaññapenti, of grasping at viewsdiṭṭhupādānassa full understandingpariññaṁ they describepaññapenti, notna of grasping at precepts and observancessīlabbatupādānassa full understandingpariññaṁ they describepaññapenti, notna of grasping at theories of a selfattavādupādānassa full understandingpariññaṁ they describepaññapenti.
thatTaṁ of whatkissa reason?hetu?
theseImāni forhi thosete gentlemenbhonto ascetics and brahminssamaṇabrāhmaṇā twodve thingsṭhānāni as it really isyathābhūtaṁ do not understandnappajānanti.
thereforeTasmā thosete gentlemenbhonto ascetics and brahminssamaṇabrāhmaṇā claiming full understanding of all graspingsabbupādānapariññāvādā professingpaṭijānamānā;
theyte notna rightlysammā full understanding of all graspingsabbupādānapariññaṁ describepaññapenti—
of grasping at sensual pleasureskāmupādānassa full understandingpariññaṁ they describepaññapenti, of grasping at viewsdiṭṭhupādānassa full understandingpariññaṁ they describepaññapenti, notna of grasping at precepts and observancessīlabbatupādānassa full understandingpariññaṁ they describepaññapenti, notna of grasping at theories of a selfattavādupādānassa full understandingpariññaṁ they describepaññapenti.

There are some other ascetics and brahmins who claim to propound the complete understanding of all kinds of grasping, but they don’t really. They describe the complete understanding of grasping at sensual pleasures and views, but not precepts and observances, and theories of a self. Why is that? Because those gentlemen don’t truly understand these two things. That’s why they claim to propound the complete understanding of all kinds of grasping, but they don’t really.

there areSanti, monksbhikkhave, someeke ascetics and brahminssamaṇabrāhmaṇā claiming full understanding of all graspingsabbupādānapariññāvādā professingpaṭijānamānā.
theyTe notna rightlysammā full understanding of all graspingsabbupādānapariññaṁ describepaññapenti—
of grasping at sensual pleasureskāmupādānassa full understandingpariññaṁ they describepaññapenti, of grasping at viewsdiṭṭhupādānassa full understandingpariññaṁ they describepaññapenti, of grasping at precepts and observancessīlabbatupādānassa full understandingpariññaṁ they describepaññapenti, notna of grasping at theories of a selfattavādupādānassa full understandingpariññaṁ they describepaññapenti.
thatTaṁ of whatkissa reason?hetu?
for thisImañhi thosete gentlemenbhonto ascetics and brahminssamaṇabrāhmaṇā oneekaṁ thingṭhānaṁ as it really isyathābhūtaṁ do not understandnappajānanti.
thereforeTasmā thosete gentlemenbhonto ascetics and brahminssamaṇabrāhmaṇā claiming full understanding of all graspingsabbupādānapariññāvādā professingpaṭijānamānā;
theyte notna rightlysammā full understanding of all graspingsabbupādānapariññaṁ describepaññapenti—
of grasping at sensual pleasureskāmupādānassa full understandingpariññaṁ they describepaññapenti, of grasping at viewsdiṭṭhupādānassa full understandingpariññaṁ they describepaññapenti, of grasping at precepts and observancessīlabbatupādānassa full understandingpariññaṁ they describepaññapenti, notna of grasping at theories of a selfattavādupādānassa full understandingpariññaṁ they describepaññapenti.

There are some other ascetics and brahmins who claim to propound the complete understanding of all kinds of grasping, but they don’t really. They describe the complete understanding of grasping at sensual pleasures, views, and precepts and observances, but not theories of a self. Why is that? Because those gentlemen don’t truly understand this one thing. That’s why they claim to propound the complete understanding of all kinds of grasping, but they don’t really.

in such aEvarūpe indeedkho, monksbhikkhave, teaching and trainingdhammavinaye whichyo in the Teachersatthari confidencepasādo thatso notna rightly placedsammaggato is calledakkhāyati;
whichyo in the teachingdhamme confidencepasādo thatso notna rightly placedsammaggato is calledakkhāyati;
which in the preceptssīlesu fulfillmentparipūrakāritā that notna rightly placedsammaggatā is calledakkhāyati;
which for fellow practitionerssahadhammikesu love and affectionpiyamanāpatā that notna rightly placedsammaggatā is calledakkhāyati.
thatTaṁ of whatkissa reason?hetu?
for thus thisEvañhetaṁ, monksbhikkhave, ishoti asyathā thattaṁ poorly explaineddurakkhāte in a teaching and trainingdhammavinaye poorly propoundedduppavedite not emancipatinganiyyānike not leading to peaceanupasamasaṁvattanike not proclaimed by a fully awakened Buddhaasammāsambuddhappavedite.

In such a teaching and training, confidence in the Teacher is said to be not rightly placed. Likewise, confidence in the teaching, fulfillment of the precepts, and love and affection for those sharing the same path are said to be not rightly placed. Why is that? It’s because that teaching and training is poorly explained and poorly propounded, not emancipating, not leading to peace, proclaimed by someone who is not a fully awakened Buddha.

the Realized OneTathāgato andca indeedkho, monksbhikkhave, the perfected onearahaṁ fully awakenedsammāsambuddho claiming full understanding of all graspingsabbupādānapariññāvādo professingpaṭijānamāno rightlysammā full understanding of all graspingsabbupādānapariññaṁ describespaññapeti—
of grasping at sensual pleasureskāmupādānassa full understandingpariññaṁ he describespaññapeti, of grasping at viewsdiṭṭhupādānassa full understandingpariññaṁ he describespaññapeti, of grasping at precepts and observancessīlabbatupādānassa full understandingpariññaṁ he describespaññapeti, of grasping at theories of a selfattavādupādānassa full understandingpariññaṁ he describespaññapeti.

The Realized One, the perfected one, the fully awakened Buddha claims to propound the complete understanding of all kinds of grasping. He describes the complete understanding of grasping at sensual pleasures, views, precepts and observances, and theories of a self.

in such aEvarūpe indeedkho, monksbhikkhave, teaching and trainingdhammavinaye whichyo in the Teachersatthari confidencepasādo thatso rightly placedsammaggato is calledakkhāyati;
whichyo in the teachingdhamme confidencepasādo thatso rightly placedsammaggato is calledakkhāyati;
which in the preceptssīlesu fulfillmentparipūrakāritā that rightly placedsammaggatā is calledakkhāyati;
which for fellow practitionerssahadhammikesu love and affectionpiyamanāpatā that rightly placedsammaggatā is calledakkhāyati.
thatTaṁ of whatkissa reason?hetu?
for thus thisEvañhetaṁ, monksbhikkhave, ishoti asyathā thattaṁ well explainedsvākkhāte in a teaching and trainingdhammavinaye well propoundedsuppavedite emancipatingniyyānike leading to peaceupasamasaṁvattanike proclaimed by a fully awakened Buddhasammāsambuddhappavedite.

In such a teaching and training, confidence in the Teacher is said to be rightly placed. Likewise, confidence in the teaching, fulfillment of the precepts, and love and affection for those sharing the same path are said to be rightly placed. Why is that? It’s because that teaching and training is well explained and well propounded, emancipating, leading to peace, proclaimed by a fully awakened Buddha.

theseIme andca, monksbhikkhave, fourcattāro graspingsupādānā. with what sourceKiṁnidānā with what originkiṁsamudayā with what birthplacekiṁjātikā with what inception?kiṁpabhavā?
theseIme fourcattāro graspingsupādānā have craving as sourcetaṇhānidānā have craving as origintaṇhāsamudayā have craving as birthplacetaṇhājātikā have craving as inceptiontaṇhāpabhavā.
cravingTaṇhā and thiscāyaṁ, monksbhikkhave, with what sourcekiṁnidānā with what originkiṁsamudayā with what birthplacekiṁjātikā with what inception?kiṁpabhavā?
cravingTaṇhā has feeling as sourcevedanānidānā has feeling as originvedanāsamudayā has feeling as birthplacevedanājātikā has feeling as inceptionvedanāpabhavā.
feelingVedanā and thiscāyaṁ, monksbhikkhave, with what sourcekiṁnidānā with what originkiṁsamudayā with what birthplacekiṁjātikā with what inception?kiṁpabhavā?
feelingVedanā has contact as sourcephassanidānā has contact as originphassasamudayā has contact as birthplacephassajātikā has contact as inceptionphassapabhavā.
contactPhasso and thiscāyaṁ, monksbhikkhave, with what sourcekiṁnidāno with what originkiṁsamudayo with what birthplacekiṁjātiko with what inception?kiṁpabhavo?
contactPhasso has the six sense fields as sourcesaḷāyatananidāno has the six sense fields as originsaḷāyatanasamudayo has the six sense fields as birthplacesaḷāyatanajātiko has the six sense fields as inceptionsaḷāyatanapabhavo.
and these six sense fieldsSaḷāyatanañcidaṁ, monksbhikkhave, with what sourcekiṁnidānaṁ with what originkiṁsamudayaṁ with what birthplacekiṁjātikaṁ with what inception?kiṁpabhavaṁ?
the six sense fieldsSaḷāyatanaṁ have name and form as sourcenāmarūpanidānaṁ have name and form as originnāmarūpasamudayaṁ have name and form as birthplacenāmarūpajātikaṁ have name and form as inceptionnāmarūpapabhavaṁ.
and this name and formNāmarūpañcidaṁ, monksbhikkhave, with what sourcekiṁnidānaṁ with what originkiṁsamudayaṁ with what birthplacekiṁjātikaṁ with what inception?kiṁpabhavaṁ?
name and formNāmarūpaṁ has consciousness as sourceviññāṇanidānaṁ has consciousness as originviññāṇasamudayaṁ has consciousness as birthplaceviññāṇajātikaṁ has consciousness as inceptionviññāṇapabhavaṁ.
and this consciousnessViññāṇañcidaṁ, monksbhikkhave, with what sourcekiṁnidānaṁ with what originkiṁsamudayaṁ with what birthplacekiṁjātikaṁ with what inception?kiṁpabhavaṁ?
consciousnessViññāṇaṁ has choices as sourcesaṅkhāranidānaṁ has choices as originsaṅkhārasamudayaṁ has choices as birthplacesaṅkhārajātikaṁ has choices as inceptionsaṅkhārapabhavaṁ.
choicesSaṅkhārā and thesecime, monksbhikkhave, with what sourcekiṁnidānā with what originkiṁsamudayā with what birthplacekiṁjātikā with what inception?kiṁpabhavā?
choicesSaṅkhārā have ignorance as sourceavijjānidānā have ignorance as originavijjāsamudayā have ignorance as birthplaceavijjājātikā have ignorance as inceptionavijjāpabhavā.

What is the source, origin, birthplace, and inception of these four kinds of grasping? Craving. And what is the source, origin, birthplace, and inception of craving? Feeling. And what is the source of feeling? Contact. And what is the source of contact? The six sense fields. And what is the source of the six sense fields? Name and form. And what is the source of name and form? Consciousness. And what is the source of consciousness? Choices. And what is the source of choices? Ignorance.

whenYato andca indeedkho, monksbhikkhave, of a monkbhikkhuno ignoranceavijjā abandonedpahīnā ishoti knowledgevijjā arisenuppannā, heso with the fading of ignoranceavijjāvirāgā with the arising of knowledgevijjuppādā neitherneva grasping at sensual pleasureskāmupādānaṁ graspsupādiyati, norna grasping at viewsdiṭṭhupādānaṁ graspsupādiyati, norna grasping at precepts and observancessīlabbatupādānaṁ graspsupādiyati, norna grasping at theories of a selfattavādupādānaṁ graspsupādiyati.
not graspingAnupādiyaṁ notna is anxiousparitassati, not being anxiousaparitassaṁ personallypaccattaññeva is fully extinguishedparinibbāyati.
ended‘Khīṇā birthjāti, completedvusitaṁ the spiritual lifebrahmacariyaṁ, donekataṁ what had to be donekaraṇīyaṁ, no morenāparaṁ for this state (quote)itthattāyā’ti he understands (quote)pajānātī”ti.
this saidIdamavoca the Blessed Onebhagavā.
satisfiedAttamanā thosete monksbhikkhū of the Blessed Onebhagavato the wordsbhāsitaṁ rejoiced in (quote)abhinandunti.
the Shorter Lion's Roar DiscourseCūḷasīhanādasuttaṁ finishedniṭṭhitaṁ the firstpaṭhamaṁ.

When that mendicant has given up ignorance and given rise to knowledge, with the fading away of ignorance and the arising of knowledge they don’t grasp at sensual pleasures, views, precepts and observances, or theories of a self. Not grasping, they’re not anxious. Not being anxious, they personally become extinguished. They understand: ‘Rebirth is ended, the spiritual journey has been completed, what had to be done has been done, there is nothing further for this place.’” That is what the Buddha said. Satisfied, the mendicants approved what the Buddha said.

‹ Previous  ·  Page 2 of 2

Lite mode — plain HTML for e-readers and old browsers. Full version