Araṇavibhaṅgasutta

sutta.stream

‹ Library

Majjhima Nikāya 139

The Analysis of No Strife · Translation: Bhikkhu Sujato, SuttaCentral

Parallels & more translations on SuttaCentral

Glosses: Fluent · Literal · Off
Translation: Hide · Show

Tap any word for its dictionary entry.

iti yaṁ taṁ vuttaṁ, idametaṁ paṭicca vuttaṁ.

That’s what I said, and this is why I said it.

‘Ataramānova bhāseyya no taramāno’ti—
iti kho panetaṁ vuttaṁ. Kiñcetaṁ paṭicca vuttaṁ?
Tatra, bhikkhave, taramānassa bhāsato kāyopi kilamati, cittampi upahaññati, saropi upahaññati, kaṇṭhopi āturīyati, avisaṭṭhampi hoti aviññeyyaṁ taramānassa bhāsitaṁ.
Tatra, bhikkhave, ataramānassa bhāsato kāyopi na kilamati, cittampi na upahaññati, saropi na upahaññati, kaṇṭhopi na āturīyati, visaṭṭhampi hoti viññeyyaṁ ataramānassa bhāsitaṁ.
‘Ataramānova bhāseyya, no taramāno’ti—
iti yaṁ taṁ vuttaṁ, idametaṁ paṭicca vuttaṁ.

‘Don’t speak hurriedly.’ That’s what I said, but why did I say it? When speaking hurriedly, your body gets tired, your mind gets stressed, your voice gets stressed, your throat gets sore, and your words become unclear and hard to understand. When not speaking hurriedly, your body doesn’t get tired, your mind doesn’t get stressed, your voice doesn’t get stressed, your throat doesn’t get sore, and your words are clear and easy to understand. ‘Don’t speak hurriedly.’ That’s what I said, and this is why I said it.

‘Don’t insist on popular definitions and don’t overstep normal labels.’ That’s what I said, but why did I say it? And how do you insist on popular definitions and overstep normal labels? It’s when among different populations they label the same thing as a ‘cup’, a ‘bowl’, a ‘jar’, a ‘scoop’, a ‘vessel’, a ‘dish’, or a ‘plate’. And however it is known among those various populations, you speak accordingly, obstinately sticking to that and insisting: ‘This is the only truth, anything else is futile.’ That’s how you insist on popular definitions and overstep normal labels. And how do you not insist on popular definitions and overstep normal labels? It’s when among different populations they label the same thing as a ‘cup’, a ‘bowl’, a ‘jar’, a ‘scoop’, a ‘vessel’, a ‘dish’, or a ‘plate’.

Iti yathā yathā naṁ tesu tesu janapadesu sañjānanti ‘idaṁ kira me āyasmanto sandhāya voharantī’ti tathā tathā voharati aparāmasaṁ.
Evaṁ kho, bhikkhave, janapadaniruttiyā ca anabhiniveso hoti, samaññāya ca anatisāro.
‘Janapadaniruttiṁ nābhiniveseyya samaññaṁ nātidhāveyyā’ti—
iti yaṁ taṁ vuttaṁ, idametaṁ paṭicca vuttaṁ.

And however it is known among those various populations, you speak accordingly, thinking: ‘It seems that the venerables are referring to this.’ That’s how you don’t insist on popular definitions and don’t overstep normal labels. ‘Don’t insist on popular definitions and don’t overstep normal labels.’ That’s what I said, and this is why I said it.

Tatra, bhikkhave, yo kāmapaṭisandhisukhino somanassānuyogo hīno gammo pothujjaniko anariyo anatthasaṁhito, sadukkho eso dhammo saupaghāto saupāyāso sapariḷāho;
micchāpaṭipadā.
Tasmā eso dhammo saraṇo.
Tatra, bhikkhave, yo kāmapaṭisandhisukhino somanassānuyogaṁ ananuyogo hīnaṁ gammaṁ pothujjanikaṁ anariyaṁ anatthasaṁhitaṁ, adukkho eso dhammo anupaghāto anupāyāso apariḷāho;
sammāpaṭipadā.
Tasmā eso dhammo araṇo.
Tatra, bhikkhave, yo attakilamathānuyogo dukkho anariyo anatthasaṁhito, sadukkho eso dhammo saupaghāto saupāyāso sapariḷāho;
micchāpaṭipadā.
Tasmā eso dhammo saraṇo.
Tatra, bhikkhave, yo attakilamathānuyogaṁ ananuyogo dukkhaṁ anariyaṁ anatthasaṁhitaṁ, adukkho eso dhammo anupaghāto anupāyāso apariḷāho;
sammāpaṭipadā.
Tasmā eso dhammo araṇo.
Tatra, bhikkhave, yāyaṁ majjhimā paṭipadā tathāgatena abhisambuddhā, cakkhukaraṇī ñāṇakaraṇī upasamāya abhiññāya sambodhāya nibbānāya saṁvattati, adukkho eso dhammo anupaghāto anupāyāso apariḷāho;

Now, mendicants, indulging in the happiness of the pleasure linked to sensuality is low, crude, ordinary, ignoble, and pointless. It is a principle beset by pain, harm, stress, and fever, and it is the wrong way. That’s why this is a principle beset by strife. Breaking off such indulgence is a principle free of pain, harm, stress, and fever, and it is the right way. That’s why this is a principle free of strife. Indulging in self-mortification is painful, ignoble, and pointless. It is a principle beset by pain, harm, stress, and fever, and it is the wrong way. That’s why this is a principle beset by strife. Breaking off such indulgence is a principle free of pain, harm, stress, and fever, and it is the right way. That’s why this is a principle free of strife. The middle way of practice that was understood by the Realized One gives vision and knowledge, and leads to peace, direct knowledge, awakening, and extinguishment. It is a principle free of pain, harm, stress, and fever, and it is the right way.

sammāpaṭipadā.
Tasmā eso dhammo araṇo.
Tatra, bhikkhave, yāyaṁ ussādanā ca apasādanā ca no ca dhammadesanā, sadukkho eso dhammo saupaghāto saupāyāso sapariḷāho;
micchāpaṭipadā.
Tasmā eso dhammo saraṇo.
Tatra, bhikkhave, yāyaṁ nevussādanā ca na apasādanā ca dhammadesanā ca, adukkho eso dhammo anupaghāto anupāyāso apariḷāho;
sammāpaṭipadā.
Tasmā eso dhammo araṇo.
Tatra, bhikkhave, yamidaṁ kāmasukhaṁ mīḷhasukhaṁ pothujjanasukhaṁ anariyasukhaṁ, sadukkho eso dhammo saupaghāto saupāyāso sapariḷāho;
micchāpaṭipadā.
Tasmā eso dhammo saraṇo.
Tatra, bhikkhave, yamidaṁ nekkhammasukhaṁ pavivekasukhaṁ upasamasukhaṁ sambodhisukhaṁ, adukkho eso dhammo anupaghāto anupāyāso apariḷāho;
sammāpaṭipadā.
Tasmā eso dhammo araṇo.
Tatra, bhikkhave, yvāyaṁ rahovādo abhūto ataccho anatthasaṁhito, sadukkho eso dhammo saupaghāto saupāyāso sapariḷāho;
micchāpaṭipadā.

That’s why this is a principle free of strife. Flattering and rebuking without teaching Dhamma is a principle beset by pain, harm, stress, and fever, and it is the wrong way. That’s why this is a principle beset by strife. Neither flattering nor rebuking, and just teaching Dhamma is a principle free of pain, harm, stress, and fever, and it is the right way. That’s why this is a principle free of strife. Sensual pleasure—a filthy, common, ignoble pleasure—is a principle beset by pain, harm, stress, and fever, and it is the wrong way. That’s why this is a principle beset by strife. The pleasure of renunciation, the pleasure of seclusion, the pleasure of peace, the pleasure of awakening is a principle free of pain, harm, stress, and fever, and it is the right way. That’s why this is a principle free of strife. Saying untrue, false, and pointless things behind someone’s back is a principle beset by pain, harm, stress, and fever, and it is the wrong way.

Tasmā eso dhammo saraṇo.
Tatra, bhikkhave, yvāyaṁ rahovādo bhūto taccho anatthasaṁhito, sadukkho eso dhammo saupaghāto saupāyāso sapariḷāho;
micchāpaṭipadā.
Tasmā eso dhammo saraṇo.
Tatra, bhikkhave, yvāyaṁ rahovādo bhūto taccho atthasaṁhito, adukkho eso dhammo anupaghāto anupāyāso apariḷāho;
sammāpaṭipadā.
Tasmā eso dhammo araṇo.
Tatra, bhikkhave, yvāyaṁ sammukhā khīṇavādo abhūto ataccho anatthasaṁhito, sadukkho eso dhammo saupaghāto saupāyāso sapariḷāho;
micchāpaṭipadā.
Tasmā eso dhammo saraṇo.
Tatra, bhikkhave, yvāyaṁ sammukhā khīṇavādo bhūto taccho anatthasaṁhito, sadukkho eso dhammo saupaghāto saupāyāso sapariḷāho;
micchāpaṭipadā.
Tasmā eso dhammo saraṇo.
Tatra, bhikkhave, yvāyaṁ sammukhā khīṇavādo bhūto taccho atthasaṁhito, adukkho eso dhammo anupaghāto anupāyāso apariḷāho;
sammāpaṭipadā.
Tasmā eso dhammo araṇo.

That’s why this is a principle beset by strife. Saying true and correct, but pointless things behind someone’s back is a principle beset by pain, harm, stress, and fever, and it is the wrong way. That’s why this is a principle beset by strife. Saying true, correct, and beneficial things behind someone’s back is a principle free of pain, harm, stress, and fever, and it is the right way. That’s why this is a principle free of strife. Saying untrue, false, and pointless things in someone’s presence is a principle beset by pain, harm, stress, and fever, and it is the wrong way. That’s why this is a principle beset by strife. Saying true and correct, but pointless things in someone’s presence is a principle beset by pain, harm, stress, and fever, and it is the wrong way. That’s why this is a principle beset by strife. Saying true, correct, and beneficial things in someone’s presence is a principle free of pain, harm, stress, and fever, and it is the right way. That’s why this is a principle free of strife.

Tatra, bhikkhave, yamidaṁ taramānassa bhāsitaṁ, sadukkho eso dhammo saupaghāto saupāyāso sapariḷāho;
micchāpaṭipadā.
Tasmā eso dhammo saraṇo.
Tatra, bhikkhave, yamidaṁ ataramānassa bhāsitaṁ, adukkho eso dhammo anupaghāto anupāyāso apariḷāho;
sammāpaṭipadā.
Tasmā eso dhammo araṇo.
Tatra, bhikkhave, yvāyaṁ janapadaniruttiyā ca abhiniveso samaññāya ca atisāro, sadukkho eso dhammo saupaghāto saupāyāso sapariḷāho;
micchāpaṭipadā.
Tasmā eso dhammo saraṇo.
Tatra, bhikkhave, yvāyaṁ janapadaniruttiyā ca anabhiniveso samaññāya ca anatisāro, adukkho eso dhammo anupaghāto anupāyāso apariḷāho;
sammāpaṭipadā.
Tasmā eso dhammo araṇo.

Speaking hurriedly is a principle beset by pain, harm, stress, and fever, and it is the wrong way. That’s why this is a principle beset by strife. Speaking unhurriedly is a principle free of pain, harm, stress, and fever, and it is the right way. That’s why this is a principle free of strife. Insisting on popular definitions and overriding common usage is a principle beset by pain, harm, stress, and fever, and it is the wrong way. That’s why this is a principle beset by strife. Not insisting on popular definitions and not overriding common usage is a principle free of pain, harm, stress, and fever, and it is the right way. That’s why this is a principle free of strife.

Tasmātiha, bhikkhave, ‘saraṇañca dhammaṁ jānissāma, araṇañca dhammaṁ jānissāma;
saraṇañca dhammaṁ ñatvā araṇañca dhammaṁ ñatvā araṇapaṭipadaṁ paṭipajjissāmā’ti evañhi vo, bhikkhave, sikkhitabbaṁ.
Subhūti ca pana, bhikkhave, kulaputto araṇapaṭipadaṁ paṭipanno”ti.
Idamavoca bhagavā.
Attamanā te bhikkhū bhagavato bhāsitaṁ abhinandunti.
Araṇavibhaṅgasuttaṁ niṭṭhitaṁ navamaṁ.

So you should train like this: ‘We shall know the principles beset by strife and the principles free of strife. Knowing this, we will practice the way free of strife.’ And, mendicants, the gentleman Subhūti practices the way free of strife.” That is what the Buddha said. Satisfied, the mendicants approved what the Buddha said.

Lite mode — plain HTML for e-readers and old browsers. Full version