The Analysis of No Strife · Translation: Bhikkhu Sujato, SuttaCentral
Parallels & more translations on SuttaCentral
thusiti whichyaṁ thattaṁ was saidvuttaṁ, thisidametaṁ because ofpaṭicca was saidvuttaṁ.
That’s what I said, and this is why I said it.
only unhurriedly‘Ataramānova
one should speakbhāseyya
notno
hurriedlytaramāno’ti—
thusiti
indeedkho
now thispanetaṁ
was saidvuttaṁ.
why thisKiñcetaṁ
dependent onpaṭicca
was saidvuttaṁ?
thereTatra,
monksbhikkhave,
of one hurryingtaramānassa
of one speakingbhāsato
the body tookāyopi
gets tiredkilamati,
the mind toocittampi
gets stressedupahaññati,
the voice toosaropi
gets stressedupahaññati,
the throat tookaṇṭhopi
gets soreāturīyati,
also unclearavisaṭṭhampi
ishoti
hard to understandaviññeyyaṁ
of one hurryingtaramānassa
speechbhāsitaṁ.
thereTatra,
monksbhikkhave,
of one not hurryingataramānassa
of one speakingbhāsato
the body tookāyopi
notna
gets tiredkilamati,
the mind toocittampi
notna
gets stressedupahaññati,
the voice toosaropi
notna
gets stressedupahaññati,
the throat tookaṇṭhopi
notna
gets soreāturīyati,
also clearvisaṭṭhampi
ishoti
easy to understandviññeyyaṁ
of one not hurryingataramānassa
speechbhāsitaṁ.
only unhurriedly‘Ataramānova
one should speakbhāseyya,
notno
hurriedlytaramāno’ti—
thusiti
whichyaṁ
thattaṁ
was saidvuttaṁ,
thisidametaṁ
dependent onpaṭicca
was saidvuttaṁ.
‘Don’t speak hurriedly.’ That’s what I said, but why did I say it? When speaking hurriedly, your body gets tired, your mind gets stressed, your voice gets stressed, your throat gets sore, and your words become unclear and hard to understand. When not speaking hurriedly, your body doesn’t get tired, your mind doesn’t get stressed, your voice doesn’t get stressed, your throat doesn’t get sore, and your words are clear and easy to understand. ‘Don’t speak hurriedly.’ That’s what I said, and this is why I said it.
popular definition‘Janapadaniruttiṁ
should not insist onnābhiniveseyya,
labelsamaññaṁ
should not overstepnātidhāveyyā’ti—
thusiti
indeedkho
this waspanetaṁ
saidvuttaṁ.
but why was thisKiñcetaṁ
with reference topaṭicca
saidvuttaṁ?
and howKathañca,
monksbhikkhave,
popular definitionjanapadaniruttiyā
andca
insistenceabhiniveso
there ishoti
labelsamaññāya
andca
oversteppingatisāro?
hereIdha,
monksbhikkhave,
the same thingtadevekaccesu
among populationsjanapadesu
as a cup‘pātī’ti
they label itsañjānanti,
as a bowl‘pattan’ti
they label itsañjānanti,
as a jar‘vittan’ti
they label itsañjānanti,
as a scoop‘sarāvan’ti
they label itsañjānanti
as a vessel‘dhāropan’ti
they label itsañjānanti,
as a dish‘poṇan’ti
they label itsañjānanti,
as a plate‘pisīlavan’ti
they label itsañjānanti.
thusIti
asyathā
asyathā
itnaṁ
in thosetesu
in thosetesu
among populationsjanapadesu
they label itsañjānanti
sotathā
sotathā
obstinatelythāmasā
sticking toparāmāsā
insistingabhinivissa
you speakvoharati:
this alone‘idameva
truthsaccaṁ,
anything else is futilemoghamaññan’ti.
thusEvaṁ
indeedkho,
monksbhikkhave,
popular definitionjanapadaniruttiyā
andca
insistenceabhiniveso
there ishoti
labelsamaññāya
andca
oversteppingatisāro.
and howKathañca,
monksbhikkhave,
popular definitionjanapadaniruttiyā
andca
non-insistenceanabhiniveso
there ishoti
labelsamaññāya
andca
non-oversteppinganatisāro?
hereIdha,
monksbhikkhave,
the same thingtadevekaccesu
among populationsjanapadesu
as a cup‘pātī’ti
they label itsañjānanti,
as a bowl‘pattan’ti
they label itsañjānanti,
as a jar‘vittan’ti
they label itsañjānanti,
as a scoop‘sarāvan’ti
they label itsañjānanti,
as a vessel‘dhāropan’ti
they label itsañjānanti,
as a dish‘poṇan’ti
they label itsañjānanti,
as a plate‘pisīlavan’ti
they label itsañjānanti.
‘Don’t insist on popular definitions and don’t overstep normal labels.’ That’s what I said, but why did I say it? And how do you insist on popular definitions and overstep normal labels? It’s when among different populations they label the same thing as a ‘cup’, a ‘bowl’, a ‘jar’, a ‘scoop’, a ‘vessel’, a ‘dish’, or a ‘plate’. And however it is known among those various populations, you speak accordingly, obstinately sticking to that and insisting: ‘This is the only truth, anything else is futile.’ That’s how you insist on popular definitions and overstep normal labels. And how do you not insist on popular definitions and overstep normal labels? It’s when among different populations they label the same thing as a ‘cup’, a ‘bowl’, a ‘jar’, a ‘scoop’, a ‘vessel’, a ‘dish’, or a ‘plate’.
thusIti
asyathā
asyathā
itnaṁ
in thosetesu
in thosetesu
in countriesjanapadesu
they knowsañjānanti
‘this‘idaṁ
indeedkira
myme
venerablesāyasmanto
referring tosandhāya
they speak’voharantī’ti
sotathā
sotathā
you speakvoharati
not insistingaparāmasaṁ.
thusEvaṁ
indeedkho,
monksbhikkhave,
in popular definitionsjanapadaniruttiyā
andca
no insistenceanabhiniveso
there ishoti,
in normal labelssamaññāya
andca
no oversteppinganatisāro.
‘Popular definitions‘Janapadaniruttiṁ
should not insist onnābhiniveseyya
normal labelssamaññaṁ
should not overstep’—nātidhāveyyā’ti—
thusiti
whatyaṁ
thattaṁ
was saidvuttaṁ,
thisidametaṁ
because ofpaṭicca
saidvuttaṁ.
And however it is known among those various populations, you speak accordingly, thinking: ‘It seems that the venerables are referring to this.’ That’s how you don’t insist on popular definitions and don’t overstep normal labels. ‘Don’t insist on popular definitions and don’t overstep normal labels.’ That’s what I said, and this is why I said it.
thereTatra,
mendicantsbhikkhave,
whichyo
of happiness of sensual reconnectionkāmapaṭisandhisukhino
indulgence in joysomanassānuyogo
lowhīno
crudegammo
ordinarypothujjaniko
ignobleanariyo
pointlessanatthasaṁhito,
beset by painsadukkho
thiseso
principledhammo
beset by harmsaupaghāto
beset by stresssaupāyāso
beset by feversapariḷāho;
wrong waymicchāpaṭipadā.
thereforeTasmā
thiseso
principledhammo
beset by strifesaraṇo.
thereTatra,
mendicantsbhikkhave,
whichyo
of happiness of sensual reconnectionkāmapaṭisandhisukhino
indulgence in joysomanassānuyogaṁ
breaking offananuyogo
lowhīnaṁ
crudegammaṁ
ordinarypothujjanikaṁ
ignobleanariyaṁ
pointlessanatthasaṁhitaṁ,
free of painadukkho
thiseso
principledhammo
free of harmanupaghāto
free of stressanupāyāso
free of feverapariḷāho;
right waysammāpaṭipadā.
thereforeTasmā
thiseso
principledhammo
free of strifearaṇo.
thereTatra,
mendicantsbhikkhave,
whichyo
indulgence in self-mortificationattakilamathānuyogo
painfuldukkho
ignobleanariyo
pointlessanatthasaṁhito,
beset by painsadukkho
thiseso
principledhammo
beset by harmsaupaghāto
beset by stresssaupāyāso
beset by feversapariḷāho;
wrong waymicchāpaṭipadā.
thereforeTasmā
thiseso
principledhammo
beset by strifesaraṇo.
thereTatra,
mendicantsbhikkhave,
whichyo
indulgence in self-mortificationattakilamathānuyogaṁ
breaking offananuyogo
painfuldukkhaṁ
ignobleanariyaṁ
pointlessanatthasaṁhitaṁ,
free of painadukkho
thiseso
principledhammo
free of harmanupaghāto
free of stressanupāyāso
free of feverapariḷāho;
right waysammāpaṭipadā.
thereforeTasmā
thiseso
principledhammo
free of strifearaṇo.
thereTatra,
mendicantsbhikkhave,
this whichyāyaṁ
middlemajjhimā
way of practicepaṭipadā
by the Realized Onetathāgatena
understoodabhisambuddhā,
giving visioncakkhukaraṇī
giving knowledgeñāṇakaraṇī
to peaceupasamāya
to direct knowledgeabhiññāya
to awakeningsambodhāya
to extinguishmentnibbānāya
leadssaṁvattati,
free of painadukkho
thiseso
principledhammo
free of harmanupaghāto
free of stressanupāyāso
free of feverapariḷāho;
Now, mendicants, indulging in the happiness of the pleasure linked to sensuality is low, crude, ordinary, ignoble, and pointless. It is a principle beset by pain, harm, stress, and fever, and it is the wrong way. That’s why this is a principle beset by strife. Breaking off such indulgence is a principle free of pain, harm, stress, and fever, and it is the right way. That’s why this is a principle free of strife. Indulging in self-mortification is painful, ignoble, and pointless. It is a principle beset by pain, harm, stress, and fever, and it is the wrong way. That’s why this is a principle beset by strife. Breaking off such indulgence is a principle free of pain, harm, stress, and fever, and it is the right way. That’s why this is a principle free of strife. The middle way of practice that was understood by the Realized One gives vision and knowledge, and leads to peace, direct knowledge, awakening, and extinguishment. It is a principle free of pain, harm, stress, and fever, and it is the right way.
right practice.sammāpaṭipadā.
thereforeTasmā
thiseso
principledhammo
free of strife.araṇo.
there,Tatra,
monks,bhikkhave,
whichyāyaṁ
flatteringussādanā
andca
rebukingapasādanā
andca
notno
andca
teaching Dhamma,dhammadesanā,
beset by painsadukkho
thiseso
principledhammo
beset by harmsaupaghāto
beset by stresssaupāyāso
beset by fever;sapariḷāho;
wrong practice.micchāpaṭipadā.
thereforeTasmā
thiseso
principledhammo
beset by strife.saraṇo.
there,Tatra,
monks,bhikkhave,
whichyāyaṁ
neither flatteringnevussādanā
andca
notna
rebukingapasādanā
andca
teaching Dhammadhammadesanā
and,ca,
free of painadukkho
thiseso
principledhammo
free of harmanupaghāto
free of stressanupāyāso
free of fever;apariḷāho;
right practice.sammāpaṭipadā.
thereforeTasmā
thiseso
principledhammo
free of strife.araṇo.
there,Tatra,
monks,bhikkhave,
that whichyamidaṁ
sensual pleasurekāmasukhaṁ
filthy pleasuremīḷhasukhaṁ
common pleasurepothujjanasukhaṁ
ignoble pleasure,anariyasukhaṁ,
beset by painsadukkho
thiseso
principledhammo
beset by harmsaupaghāto
beset by stresssaupāyāso
beset by fever;sapariḷāho;
wrong practice.micchāpaṭipadā.
thereforeTasmā
thiseso
principledhammo
beset by strife.saraṇo.
there,Tatra,
monks,bhikkhave,
that whichyamidaṁ
pleasure of renunciationnekkhammasukhaṁ
pleasure of seclusionpavivekasukhaṁ
pleasure of peaceupasamasukhaṁ
pleasure of awakening,sambodhisukhaṁ,
free of painadukkho
thiseso
principledhammo
free of harmanupaghāto
free of stressanupāyāso
free of fever;apariḷāho;
right practice.sammāpaṭipadā.
thereforeTasmā
thiseso
principledhammo
free of strife.araṇo.
there,Tatra,
monks,bhikkhave,
that whichyvāyaṁ
talk behind one's backrahovādo
untrueabhūto
falseataccho
pointless,anatthasaṁhito,
beset by painsadukkho
thiseso
principledhammo
beset by harmsaupaghāto
beset by stresssaupāyāso
beset by fever;sapariḷāho;
wrong practice.micchāpaṭipadā.
That’s why this is a principle free of strife. Flattering and rebuking without teaching Dhamma is a principle beset by pain, harm, stress, and fever, and it is the wrong way. That’s why this is a principle beset by strife. Neither flattering nor rebuking, and just teaching Dhamma is a principle free of pain, harm, stress, and fever, and it is the right way. That’s why this is a principle free of strife. Sensual pleasure—a filthy, common, ignoble pleasure—is a principle beset by pain, harm, stress, and fever, and it is the wrong way. That’s why this is a principle beset by strife. The pleasure of renunciation, the pleasure of seclusion, the pleasure of peace, the pleasure of awakening is a principle free of pain, harm, stress, and fever, and it is the right way. That’s why this is a principle free of strife. Saying untrue, false, and pointless things behind someone’s back is a principle beset by pain, harm, stress, and fever, and it is the wrong way.
thereforeTasmā
thiseso
teachingdhammo
beset by strifesaraṇo.
thereTatra,
monksbhikkhave,
that whichyvāyaṁ
speech behind one's backrahovādo
beingbhūto
truetaccho
pointlessanatthasaṁhito,
painfulsadukkho
thiseso
teachingdhammo
harmfulsaupaghāto
stressfulsaupāyāso
feverishsapariḷāho;
the wrong waymicchāpaṭipadā.
thereforeTasmā
thiseso
teachingdhammo
beset by strifesaraṇo.
thereTatra,
monksbhikkhave,
that whichyvāyaṁ
speech behind one's backrahovādo
beingbhūto
truetaccho
beneficialatthasaṁhito,
painlessadukkho
thiseso
teachingdhammo
harmlessanupaghāto
stress-freeanupāyāso
fever-freeapariḷāho;
the right waysammāpaṭipadā.
thereforeTasmā
thiseso
teachingdhammo
free of strifearaṇo.
thereTatra,
monksbhikkhave,
that whichyvāyaṁ
in one's presencesammukhā
harsh speechkhīṇavādo
untrueabhūto
falseataccho
pointlessanatthasaṁhito,
painfulsadukkho
thiseso
teachingdhammo
harmfulsaupaghāto
stressfulsaupāyāso
feverishsapariḷāho;
the wrong waymicchāpaṭipadā.
thereforeTasmā
thiseso
teachingdhammo
beset by strifesaraṇo.
thereTatra,
monksbhikkhave,
that whichyvāyaṁ
in one's presencesammukhā
harsh speechkhīṇavādo
beingbhūto
truetaccho
pointlessanatthasaṁhito,
painfulsadukkho
thiseso
teachingdhammo
harmfulsaupaghāto
stressfulsaupāyāso
feverishsapariḷāho;
the wrong waymicchāpaṭipadā.
thereforeTasmā
thiseso
teachingdhammo
beset by strifesaraṇo.
thereTatra,
monksbhikkhave,
that whichyvāyaṁ
in one's presencesammukhā
harsh speechkhīṇavādo
beingbhūto
truetaccho
beneficialatthasaṁhito,
painlessadukkho
thiseso
teachingdhammo
harmlessanupaghāto
stress-freeanupāyāso
fever-freeapariḷāho;
the right waysammāpaṭipadā.
thereforeTasmā
thiseso
teachingdhammo
free of strifearaṇo.
That’s why this is a principle beset by strife. Saying true and correct, but pointless things behind someone’s back is a principle beset by pain, harm, stress, and fever, and it is the wrong way. That’s why this is a principle beset by strife. Saying true, correct, and beneficial things behind someone’s back is a principle free of pain, harm, stress, and fever, and it is the right way. That’s why this is a principle free of strife. Saying untrue, false, and pointless things in someone’s presence is a principle beset by pain, harm, stress, and fever, and it is the wrong way. That’s why this is a principle beset by strife. Saying true and correct, but pointless things in someone’s presence is a principle beset by pain, harm, stress, and fever, and it is the wrong way. That’s why this is a principle beset by strife. Saying true, correct, and beneficial things in someone’s presence is a principle free of pain, harm, stress, and fever, and it is the right way. That’s why this is a principle free of strife.
thereTatra,
monksbhikkhave,
that whichyamidaṁ
of one hurryingtaramānassa
speakingbhāsitaṁ,
beset by painsadukkho
thiseso
principledhammo
beset by harmsaupaghāto
beset by stresssaupāyāso
beset by feversapariḷāho;
the wrong waymicchāpaṭipadā.
thereforeTasmā
thiseso
principledhammo
beset by strifesaraṇo.
thereTatra,
monksbhikkhave,
that whichyamidaṁ
of one not hurryingataramānassa
speakingbhāsitaṁ,
free of painadukkho
thiseso
principledhammo
free of harmanupaghāto
free of stressanupāyāso
free of feverapariḷāho;
the right waysammāpaṭipadā.
thereforeTasmā
thiseso
principledhammo
free of strifearaṇo.
thereTatra,
monksbhikkhave,
whatever thisyvāyaṁ
of popular definitionsjanapadaniruttiyā
andca
insistenceabhiniveso
of common usagesamaññāya
andca
overridingatisāro,
beset by painsadukkho
thiseso
principledhammo
beset by harmsaupaghāto
beset by stresssaupāyāso
beset by feversapariḷāho;
the wrong waymicchāpaṭipadā.
thereforeTasmā
thiseso
principledhammo
beset by strifesaraṇo.
thereTatra,
monksbhikkhave,
whatever thisyvāyaṁ
of popular definitionsjanapadaniruttiyā
andca
non-insistenceanabhiniveso
of common usagesamaññāya
andca
non-overridinganatisāro,
free of painadukkho
thiseso
principledhammo
free of harmanupaghāto
free of stressanupāyāso
free of feverapariḷāho;
the right waysammāpaṭipadā.
thereforeTasmā
thiseso
principledhammo
free of strifearaṇo.
Speaking hurriedly is a principle beset by pain, harm, stress, and fever, and it is the wrong way. That’s why this is a principle beset by strife. Speaking unhurriedly is a principle free of pain, harm, stress, and fever, and it is the right way. That’s why this is a principle free of strife. Insisting on popular definitions and overriding common usage is a principle beset by pain, harm, stress, and fever, and it is the wrong way. That’s why this is a principle beset by strife. Not insisting on popular definitions and not overriding common usage is a principle free of pain, harm, stress, and fever, and it is the right way. That’s why this is a principle free of strife.
therefore hereTasmātiha,
o mendicantsbhikkhave,
and the principle beset by strife‘saraṇañca
principledhammaṁ
we shall knowjānissāma,
and the principle free of strifearaṇañca
principledhammaṁ
we shall knowjānissāma;
and the principle beset by strifesaraṇañca
principledhammaṁ
having knownñatvā
and the principle free of strifearaṇañca
principledhammaṁ
having knownñatvā
the way free of strifearaṇapaṭipadaṁ
we will practicepaṭipajjissāmā’ti
thus indeedevañhi
by youvo,
o mendicantsbhikkhave,
should be trainedsikkhitabbaṁ.
SubhūtiSubhūti
andca
furthermorepana,
o mendicantsbhikkhave,
the gentlemankulaputto
the way free of strifearaṇapaṭipadaṁ
practicespaṭipanno”ti.
thisIdamavoca
the Blessed Onebhagavā.
satisfiedAttamanā
thosete
mendicantsbhikkhū
of the Blessed Onebhagavato
statementbhāsitaṁ
they approvedabhinandunti.
The Analysis of No StrifeAraṇavibhaṅgasuttaṁ
finishedniṭṭhitaṁ
ninthnavamaṁ.
So you should train like this: ‘We shall know the principles beset by strife and the principles free of strife. Knowing this, we will practice the way free of strife.’ And, mendicants, the gentleman Subhūti practices the way free of strife.” That is what the Buddha said. Satisfied, the mendicants approved what the Buddha said.
‹ Previous · Page 3 of 3
Lite mode — plain HTML for e-readers and old browsers. Full version