sutta.stream

‹ Library

Majjhima Nikāya 139

Araṇavibhaṅgasutta

The Analysis of No Strife · Translation: Bhikkhu Sujato, SuttaCentral

Parallels & more translations on SuttaCentral

Glosses: Fluent · Literal · Off
Translation: Hide · Show

Tap any word for its dictionary entry.

thusiti whichyaṁ thattaṁ was saidvuttaṁ, thisidametaṁ because ofpaṭicca was saidvuttaṁ.

That’s what I said, and this is why I said it.

only unhurriedly‘Ataramānova one should speakbhāseyya notno hurriedlytaramāno’ti—
thusiti indeedkho now thispanetaṁ was saidvuttaṁ. why thisKiñcetaṁ dependent onpaṭicca was saidvuttaṁ?
thereTatra, monksbhikkhave, of one hurryingtaramānassa of one speakingbhāsato the body tookāyopi gets tiredkilamati, the mind toocittampi gets stressedupahaññati, the voice toosaropi gets stressedupahaññati, the throat tookaṇṭhopi gets soreāturīyati, also unclearavisaṭṭhampi ishoti hard to understandaviññeyyaṁ of one hurryingtaramānassa speechbhāsitaṁ.
thereTatra, monksbhikkhave, of one not hurryingataramānassa of one speakingbhāsato the body tookāyopi notna gets tiredkilamati, the mind toocittampi notna gets stressedupahaññati, the voice toosaropi notna gets stressedupahaññati, the throat tookaṇṭhopi notna gets soreāturīyati, also clearvisaṭṭhampi ishoti easy to understandviññeyyaṁ of one not hurryingataramānassa speechbhāsitaṁ.
only unhurriedly‘Ataramānova one should speakbhāseyya, notno hurriedlytaramāno’ti—
thusiti whichyaṁ thattaṁ was saidvuttaṁ, thisidametaṁ dependent onpaṭicca was saidvuttaṁ.

‘Don’t speak hurriedly.’ That’s what I said, but why did I say it? When speaking hurriedly, your body gets tired, your mind gets stressed, your voice gets stressed, your throat gets sore, and your words become unclear and hard to understand. When not speaking hurriedly, your body doesn’t get tired, your mind doesn’t get stressed, your voice doesn’t get stressed, your throat doesn’t get sore, and your words are clear and easy to understand. ‘Don’t speak hurriedly.’ That’s what I said, and this is why I said it.

popular definition‘Janapadaniruttiṁ should not insist onnābhiniveseyya, labelsamaññaṁ should not overstepnātidhāveyyā’ti—
thusiti indeedkho this waspanetaṁ saidvuttaṁ. but why was thisKiñcetaṁ with reference topaṭicca saidvuttaṁ?
and howKathañca, monksbhikkhave, popular definitionjanapadaniruttiyā andca insistenceabhiniveso there ishoti labelsamaññāya andca oversteppingatisāro?
hereIdha, monksbhikkhave, the same thingtadevekaccesu among populationsjanapadesu as a cup‘pātī’ti they label itsañjānanti, as a bowl‘pattan’ti they label itsañjānanti, as a jar‘vittan’ti they label itsañjānanti, as a scoop‘sarāvan’ti they label itsañjānanti as a vessel‘dhāropan’ti they label itsañjānanti, as a dish‘poṇan’ti they label itsañjānanti, as a plate‘pisīlavan’ti they label itsañjānanti.
thusIti asyathā asyathā itnaṁ in thosetesu in thosetesu among populationsjanapadesu they label itsañjānanti sotathā sotathā obstinatelythāmasā sticking toparāmāsā insistingabhinivissa you speakvoharati:
this alone‘idameva truthsaccaṁ, anything else is futilemoghamaññan’ti.
thusEvaṁ indeedkho, monksbhikkhave, popular definitionjanapadaniruttiyā andca insistenceabhiniveso there ishoti labelsamaññāya andca oversteppingatisāro.
and howKathañca, monksbhikkhave, popular definitionjanapadaniruttiyā andca non-insistenceanabhiniveso there ishoti labelsamaññāya andca non-oversteppinganatisāro?
hereIdha, monksbhikkhave, the same thingtadevekaccesu among populationsjanapadesu as a cup‘pātī’ti they label itsañjānanti, as a bowl‘pattan’ti they label itsañjānanti, as a jar‘vittan’ti they label itsañjānanti, as a scoop‘sarāvan’ti they label itsañjānanti, as a vessel‘dhāropan’ti they label itsañjānanti, as a dish‘poṇan’ti they label itsañjānanti, as a plate‘pisīlavan’ti they label itsañjānanti.

‘Don’t insist on popular definitions and don’t overstep normal labels.’ That’s what I said, but why did I say it? And how do you insist on popular definitions and overstep normal labels? It’s when among different populations they label the same thing as a ‘cup’, a ‘bowl’, a ‘jar’, a ‘scoop’, a ‘vessel’, a ‘dish’, or a ‘plate’. And however it is known among those various populations, you speak accordingly, obstinately sticking to that and insisting: ‘This is the only truth, anything else is futile.’ That’s how you insist on popular definitions and overstep normal labels. And how do you not insist on popular definitions and overstep normal labels? It’s when among different populations they label the same thing as a ‘cup’, a ‘bowl’, a ‘jar’, a ‘scoop’, a ‘vessel’, a ‘dish’, or a ‘plate’.

thusIti asyathā asyathā itnaṁ in thosetesu in thosetesu in countriesjanapadesu they knowsañjānanti ‘this‘idaṁ indeedkira myme venerablesāyasmanto referring tosandhāya they speak’voharantī’ti sotathā sotathā you speakvoharati not insistingaparāmasaṁ.
thusEvaṁ indeedkho, monksbhikkhave, in popular definitionsjanapadaniruttiyā andca no insistenceanabhiniveso there ishoti, in normal labelssamaññāya andca no oversteppinganatisāro.
‘Popular definitions‘Janapadaniruttiṁ should not insist onnābhiniveseyya normal labelssamaññaṁ should not overstep’—nātidhāveyyā’ti—
thusiti whatyaṁ thattaṁ was saidvuttaṁ, thisidametaṁ because ofpaṭicca saidvuttaṁ.

And however it is known among those various populations, you speak accordingly, thinking: ‘It seems that the venerables are referring to this.’ That’s how you don’t insist on popular definitions and don’t overstep normal labels. ‘Don’t insist on popular definitions and don’t overstep normal labels.’ That’s what I said, and this is why I said it.

thereTatra, mendicantsbhikkhave, whichyo of happiness of sensual reconnectionkāmapaṭisandhisukhino indulgence in joysomanassānuyogo lowhīno crudegammo ordinarypothujjaniko ignobleanariyo pointlessanatthasaṁhito, beset by painsadukkho thiseso principledhammo beset by harmsaupaghāto beset by stresssaupāyāso beset by feversapariḷāho;
wrong waymicchāpaṭipadā.
thereforeTasmā thiseso principledhammo beset by strifesaraṇo.
thereTatra, mendicantsbhikkhave, whichyo of happiness of sensual reconnectionkāmapaṭisandhisukhino indulgence in joysomanassānuyogaṁ breaking offananuyogo lowhīnaṁ crudegammaṁ ordinarypothujjanikaṁ ignobleanariyaṁ pointlessanatthasaṁhitaṁ, free of painadukkho thiseso principledhammo free of harmanupaghāto free of stressanupāyāso free of feverapariḷāho;
right waysammāpaṭipadā.
thereforeTasmā thiseso principledhammo free of strifearaṇo.
thereTatra, mendicantsbhikkhave, whichyo indulgence in self-mortificationattakilamathānuyogo painfuldukkho ignobleanariyo pointlessanatthasaṁhito, beset by painsadukkho thiseso principledhammo beset by harmsaupaghāto beset by stresssaupāyāso beset by feversapariḷāho;
wrong waymicchāpaṭipadā.
thereforeTasmā thiseso principledhammo beset by strifesaraṇo.
thereTatra, mendicantsbhikkhave, whichyo indulgence in self-mortificationattakilamathānuyogaṁ breaking offananuyogo painfuldukkhaṁ ignobleanariyaṁ pointlessanatthasaṁhitaṁ, free of painadukkho thiseso principledhammo free of harmanupaghāto free of stressanupāyāso free of feverapariḷāho;
right waysammāpaṭipadā.
thereforeTasmā thiseso principledhammo free of strifearaṇo.
thereTatra, mendicantsbhikkhave, this whichyāyaṁ middlemajjhimā way of practicepaṭipadā by the Realized Onetathāgatena understoodabhisambuddhā, giving visioncakkhukaraṇī giving knowledgeñāṇakaraṇī to peaceupasamāya to direct knowledgeabhiññāya to awakeningsambodhāya to extinguishmentnibbānāya leadssaṁvattati, free of painadukkho thiseso principledhammo free of harmanupaghāto free of stressanupāyāso free of feverapariḷāho;

Now, mendicants, indulging in the happiness of the pleasure linked to sensuality is low, crude, ordinary, ignoble, and pointless. It is a principle beset by pain, harm, stress, and fever, and it is the wrong way. That’s why this is a principle beset by strife. Breaking off such indulgence is a principle free of pain, harm, stress, and fever, and it is the right way. That’s why this is a principle free of strife. Indulging in self-mortification is painful, ignoble, and pointless. It is a principle beset by pain, harm, stress, and fever, and it is the wrong way. That’s why this is a principle beset by strife. Breaking off such indulgence is a principle free of pain, harm, stress, and fever, and it is the right way. That’s why this is a principle free of strife. The middle way of practice that was understood by the Realized One gives vision and knowledge, and leads to peace, direct knowledge, awakening, and extinguishment. It is a principle free of pain, harm, stress, and fever, and it is the right way.

right practice.sammāpaṭipadā.
thereforeTasmā thiseso principledhammo free of strife.araṇo.
there,Tatra, monks,bhikkhave, whichyāyaṁ flatteringussādanā andca rebukingapasādanā andca notno andca teaching Dhamma,dhammadesanā, beset by painsadukkho thiseso principledhammo beset by harmsaupaghāto beset by stresssaupāyāso beset by fever;sapariḷāho;
wrong practice.micchāpaṭipadā.
thereforeTasmā thiseso principledhammo beset by strife.saraṇo.
there,Tatra, monks,bhikkhave, whichyāyaṁ neither flatteringnevussādanā andca notna rebukingapasādanā andca teaching Dhammadhammadesanā and,ca, free of painadukkho thiseso principledhammo free of harmanupaghāto free of stressanupāyāso free of fever;apariḷāho;
right practice.sammāpaṭipadā.
thereforeTasmā thiseso principledhammo free of strife.araṇo.
there,Tatra, monks,bhikkhave, that whichyamidaṁ sensual pleasurekāmasukhaṁ filthy pleasuremīḷhasukhaṁ common pleasurepothujjanasukhaṁ ignoble pleasure,anariyasukhaṁ, beset by painsadukkho thiseso principledhammo beset by harmsaupaghāto beset by stresssaupāyāso beset by fever;sapariḷāho;
wrong practice.micchāpaṭipadā.
thereforeTasmā thiseso principledhammo beset by strife.saraṇo.
there,Tatra, monks,bhikkhave, that whichyamidaṁ pleasure of renunciationnekkhammasukhaṁ pleasure of seclusionpavivekasukhaṁ pleasure of peaceupasamasukhaṁ pleasure of awakening,sambodhisukhaṁ, free of painadukkho thiseso principledhammo free of harmanupaghāto free of stressanupāyāso free of fever;apariḷāho;
right practice.sammāpaṭipadā.
thereforeTasmā thiseso principledhammo free of strife.araṇo.
there,Tatra, monks,bhikkhave, that whichyvāyaṁ talk behind one's backrahovādo untrueabhūto falseataccho pointless,anatthasaṁhito, beset by painsadukkho thiseso principledhammo beset by harmsaupaghāto beset by stresssaupāyāso beset by fever;sapariḷāho;
wrong practice.micchāpaṭipadā.

That’s why this is a principle free of strife. Flattering and rebuking without teaching Dhamma is a principle beset by pain, harm, stress, and fever, and it is the wrong way. That’s why this is a principle beset by strife. Neither flattering nor rebuking, and just teaching Dhamma is a principle free of pain, harm, stress, and fever, and it is the right way. That’s why this is a principle free of strife. Sensual pleasure—a filthy, common, ignoble pleasure—is a principle beset by pain, harm, stress, and fever, and it is the wrong way. That’s why this is a principle beset by strife. The pleasure of renunciation, the pleasure of seclusion, the pleasure of peace, the pleasure of awakening is a principle free of pain, harm, stress, and fever, and it is the right way. That’s why this is a principle free of strife. Saying untrue, false, and pointless things behind someone’s back is a principle beset by pain, harm, stress, and fever, and it is the wrong way.

thereforeTasmā thiseso teachingdhammo beset by strifesaraṇo.
thereTatra, monksbhikkhave, that whichyvāyaṁ speech behind one's backrahovādo beingbhūto truetaccho pointlessanatthasaṁhito, painfulsadukkho thiseso teachingdhammo harmfulsaupaghāto stressfulsaupāyāso feverishsapariḷāho;
the wrong waymicchāpaṭipadā.
thereforeTasmā thiseso teachingdhammo beset by strifesaraṇo.
thereTatra, monksbhikkhave, that whichyvāyaṁ speech behind one's backrahovādo beingbhūto truetaccho beneficialatthasaṁhito, painlessadukkho thiseso teachingdhammo harmlessanupaghāto stress-freeanupāyāso fever-freeapariḷāho;
the right waysammāpaṭipadā.
thereforeTasmā thiseso teachingdhammo free of strifearaṇo.
thereTatra, monksbhikkhave, that whichyvāyaṁ in one's presencesammukhā harsh speechkhīṇavādo untrueabhūto falseataccho pointlessanatthasaṁhito, painfulsadukkho thiseso teachingdhammo harmfulsaupaghāto stressfulsaupāyāso feverishsapariḷāho;
the wrong waymicchāpaṭipadā.
thereforeTasmā thiseso teachingdhammo beset by strifesaraṇo.
thereTatra, monksbhikkhave, that whichyvāyaṁ in one's presencesammukhā harsh speechkhīṇavādo beingbhūto truetaccho pointlessanatthasaṁhito, painfulsadukkho thiseso teachingdhammo harmfulsaupaghāto stressfulsaupāyāso feverishsapariḷāho;
the wrong waymicchāpaṭipadā.
thereforeTasmā thiseso teachingdhammo beset by strifesaraṇo.
thereTatra, monksbhikkhave, that whichyvāyaṁ in one's presencesammukhā harsh speechkhīṇavādo beingbhūto truetaccho beneficialatthasaṁhito, painlessadukkho thiseso teachingdhammo harmlessanupaghāto stress-freeanupāyāso fever-freeapariḷāho;
the right waysammāpaṭipadā.
thereforeTasmā thiseso teachingdhammo free of strifearaṇo.

That’s why this is a principle beset by strife. Saying true and correct, but pointless things behind someone’s back is a principle beset by pain, harm, stress, and fever, and it is the wrong way. That’s why this is a principle beset by strife. Saying true, correct, and beneficial things behind someone’s back is a principle free of pain, harm, stress, and fever, and it is the right way. That’s why this is a principle free of strife. Saying untrue, false, and pointless things in someone’s presence is a principle beset by pain, harm, stress, and fever, and it is the wrong way. That’s why this is a principle beset by strife. Saying true and correct, but pointless things in someone’s presence is a principle beset by pain, harm, stress, and fever, and it is the wrong way. That’s why this is a principle beset by strife. Saying true, correct, and beneficial things in someone’s presence is a principle free of pain, harm, stress, and fever, and it is the right way. That’s why this is a principle free of strife.

thereTatra, monksbhikkhave, that whichyamidaṁ of one hurryingtaramānassa speakingbhāsitaṁ, beset by painsadukkho thiseso principledhammo beset by harmsaupaghāto beset by stresssaupāyāso beset by feversapariḷāho;
the wrong waymicchāpaṭipadā.
thereforeTasmā thiseso principledhammo beset by strifesaraṇo.
thereTatra, monksbhikkhave, that whichyamidaṁ of one not hurryingataramānassa speakingbhāsitaṁ, free of painadukkho thiseso principledhammo free of harmanupaghāto free of stressanupāyāso free of feverapariḷāho;
the right waysammāpaṭipadā.
thereforeTasmā thiseso principledhammo free of strifearaṇo.
thereTatra, monksbhikkhave, whatever thisyvāyaṁ of popular definitionsjanapadaniruttiyā andca insistenceabhiniveso of common usagesamaññāya andca overridingatisāro, beset by painsadukkho thiseso principledhammo beset by harmsaupaghāto beset by stresssaupāyāso beset by feversapariḷāho;
the wrong waymicchāpaṭipadā.
thereforeTasmā thiseso principledhammo beset by strifesaraṇo.
thereTatra, monksbhikkhave, whatever thisyvāyaṁ of popular definitionsjanapadaniruttiyā andca non-insistenceanabhiniveso of common usagesamaññāya andca non-overridinganatisāro, free of painadukkho thiseso principledhammo free of harmanupaghāto free of stressanupāyāso free of feverapariḷāho;
the right waysammāpaṭipadā.
thereforeTasmā thiseso principledhammo free of strifearaṇo.

Speaking hurriedly is a principle beset by pain, harm, stress, and fever, and it is the wrong way. That’s why this is a principle beset by strife. Speaking unhurriedly is a principle free of pain, harm, stress, and fever, and it is the right way. That’s why this is a principle free of strife. Insisting on popular definitions and overriding common usage is a principle beset by pain, harm, stress, and fever, and it is the wrong way. That’s why this is a principle beset by strife. Not insisting on popular definitions and not overriding common usage is a principle free of pain, harm, stress, and fever, and it is the right way. That’s why this is a principle free of strife.

therefore hereTasmātiha, o mendicantsbhikkhave, and the principle beset by strife‘saraṇañca principledhammaṁ we shall knowjānissāma, and the principle free of strifearaṇañca principledhammaṁ we shall knowjānissāma;
and the principle beset by strifesaraṇañca principledhammaṁ having knownñatvā and the principle free of strifearaṇañca principledhammaṁ having knownñatvā the way free of strifearaṇapaṭipadaṁ we will practicepaṭipajjissāmā’ti thus indeedevañhi by youvo, o mendicantsbhikkhave, should be trainedsikkhitabbaṁ.
SubhūtiSubhūti andca furthermorepana, o mendicantsbhikkhave, the gentlemankulaputto the way free of strifearaṇapaṭipadaṁ practicespaṭipanno”ti.
thisIdamavoca the Blessed Onebhagavā.
satisfiedAttamanā thosete mendicantsbhikkhū of the Blessed Onebhagavato statementbhāsitaṁ they approvedabhinandunti.
The Analysis of No StrifeAraṇavibhaṅgasuttaṁ finishedniṭṭhitaṁ ninthnavamaṁ.

So you should train like this: ‘We shall know the principles beset by strife and the principles free of strife. Knowing this, we will practice the way free of strife.’ And, mendicants, the gentleman Subhūti practices the way free of strife.” That is what the Buddha said. Satisfied, the mendicants approved what the Buddha said.

‹ Previous  ·  Page 3 of 3

Lite mode — plain HTML for e-readers and old browsers. Full version