The Longer Discourse on the Mass of Suffering · Translation: Bhikkhu Sujato, SuttaCentral
Parallels & more translations on SuttaCentral
againPuna
and furthercaparaṁ,
monksbhikkhave,
because of sensual pleasureskāmahetu
originating from sensual pleasureskāmanidānaṁ
grounded in sensual pleasureskāmādhikaraṇaṁ
precisely of sensual pleasureskāmānameva
causehetu
by bodykāyena
bad conductduccaritaṁ
they practicecaranti,
by speechvācāya
bad conductduccaritaṁ
they practicecaranti,
by mindmanasā
bad conductduccaritaṁ
they practicecaranti.
theyTe
by bodykāyena
bad conductduccaritaṁ
having practicedcaritvā,
by speechvācāya
bad conductduccaritaṁ
having practicedcaritvā,
by mindmanasā
bad conductduccaritaṁ
having practicedcaritvā,
of the bodykāyassa
with the breaking upbhedā
afterparaṁ
deathmaraṇā
a place of lossapāyaṁ
a bad destinationduggatiṁ
the underworldvinipātaṁ
hellnirayaṁ
they are rebornupapajjanti.
this tooAyampi,
monksbhikkhave,
of sensual pleasureskāmānaṁ
a drawbackādīnavo
to do with lives to comesamparāyiko,
a mass of sufferingdukkhakkhandho
because of sensual pleasureskāmahetu
originating from sensual pleasureskāmanidānaṁ
grounded in sensual pleasureskāmādhikaraṇaṁ
precisely of sensual pleasureskāmānameva
causehetu.
Furthermore, for the sake of sensual pleasures, they conduct themselves badly by way of body, speech, and mind. When their body breaks up, after death, they’re reborn in a place of loss, a bad place, the underworld, hell. This is a drawback of sensual pleasures to do with lives to come, a mass of suffering caused by sensual pleasures.
and whatKiñca,
monksbhikkhave,
of sensual pleasureskāmānaṁ
the escapenissaraṇaṁ?
whichYo
indeedkho,
monksbhikkhave,
in sensual pleasureskāmesu
removal of desire and greedchandarāgavinayo
giving up desire and greed: thischandarāgappahānaṁ—idaṁ
of sensual pleasureskāmānaṁ
the escapenissaraṇaṁ.
And what is the escape from sensual pleasures? Removing and giving up desire and greed for sensual pleasures: this is the escape from sensual pleasures.
whoeverYe
indeedhi
anykeci,
monksbhikkhave,
asceticssamaṇā
orvā
brahminsbrāhmaṇā
orvā
thusevaṁ
of sensual pleasureskāmānaṁ
gratification andassādañca
as gratificationassādato
drawback andādīnavañca
as drawbackādīnavato
escape andnissaraṇañca
as escapenissaraṇato
trulyyathābhūtaṁ
they do not understandnappajānanti
theyte
surelyvata
themselvessāmaṁ
orvā
sensual pleasureskāme
will completely understandparijānissanti,
anotherparaṁ
orvā
for suchnesstathattāya
will instructsamādapessanti
asyathā
practicingpaṭipanno
sensual pleasureskāme
will completely understand — this is notparijānissatīti—netaṁ
caseṭhānaṁ
is foundvijjati.
whoeverYe
andca
indeedkho
anykeci,
monksbhikkhave,
asceticssamaṇā
orvā
brahminsbrāhmaṇā
orvā
thusevaṁ
of sensual pleasureskāmānaṁ
gratification andassādañca
as gratificationassādato
drawback andādīnavañca
as drawbackādīnavato
escape andnissaraṇañca
as escapenissaraṇato
trulyyathābhūtaṁ
they understandpajānanti,
theyte
surelyvata
themselvessāmaṁ
orvā
sensual pleasureskāme
will completely understandparijānissanti
anotherparaṁ
orvā
for suchnesstathattāya
will instructsamādapessanti
asyathā
practicingpaṭipanno
sensual pleasureskāme
will completely understand — this isparijānissatīti—ṭhānametaṁ
is foundvijjati.
There are ascetics and brahmins who don’t truly understand sensual pleasures’ gratification, drawback, and escape in this way for what they are. It’s impossible for them to completely understand sensual pleasures themselves, or to instruct another so that, practicing accordingly, they will completely understand sensual pleasures. There are ascetics and brahmins who do truly understand sensual pleasures’ gratification, drawback, and escape in this way for what they are. It is possible for them to completely understand sensual pleasures themselves, or to instruct another so that, practicing accordingly, they will completely understand sensual pleasures.
whatKo
andca,
monksbhikkhave,
of formsrūpānaṁ
gratificationassādo?
supposeSeyyathāpi,
monksbhikkhave,
aristocrat girlkhattiyakaññā
orvā
brahmin girlbrāhmaṇakaññā
orvā
householder girlgahapatikaññā
orvā
in her fifteenth yearpannarasavassuddesikā
orvā
in her sixteenth yearsoḷasavassuddesikā
orvā,
not too tallnātidīghā
not too shortnātirassā
not too thinnātikisā
not too fatnātithūlā
not too darknātikāḷī
not too fairnāccodātā
at the heightparamā
shesā,
monksbhikkhave,
at thattasmiṁ
timesamaye
beautysubhā
prettinessvaṇṇanibhāti?
yes‘Evaṁ,
sirbhante’.
that whichYaṁ
indeedkho,
monksbhikkhave,
beautysubhaṁ
prettinessvaṇṇanibhaṁ
conditioned bypaṭicca
arisesuppajjati
pleasuresukhaṁ
happinesssomanassaṁ—
thisayaṁ
of formsrūpānaṁ
gratificationassādo.
And what is the gratification of forms? Suppose there was a girl of the brahmins, aristocrats, or householders in her fifteenth or sixteenth year, neither too tall nor too short, neither too thin nor too fat, neither too dark nor too fair. Is she not at the height of her beauty and prettiness?” “Yes, sir.” “The pleasure and happiness that arise from this beauty and prettiness is the gratification of forms.
whatKo
andca,
mendicantsbhikkhave,
of formsrūpānaṁ
drawback?ādīnavo?
hereIdha,
mendicantsbhikkhave,
that sametameva
sisterbhaginiṁ
you might seepasseyya
lateraparena
timesamayena
eighty-year-oldāsītikaṁ
orvā
ninety-year-oldnāvutikaṁ
orvā
hundred-year-oldvassasatikaṁ
orvā
by agejātiyā,
oldjiṇṇaṁ
bent doublegopānasivaṅkaṁ
crookedbhoggaṁ
leaning on a staffdaṇḍaparāyanaṁ
tremblingpavedhamānaṁ
as they walkgacchantiṁ
ailingāturaṁ
past their primegatayobbanaṁ
teeth brokenkhaṇḍadantaṁ
hair greypalitakesaṁ,
scantyvilūnaṁ
baldkhalitasiraṁ
skin wrinkledvalinaṁ
limbs blotchytilakāhatagattaṁ.
thatTaṁ
whatkiṁ
do you thinkmaññatha,
mendicantsbhikkhave,
that whichyā
formerpurimā
beautysubhā
radiant appearancevaṇṇanibhā
thatsā
has vanishedantarahitā,
drawbackādīnavo
has become clear?pātubhūtoti?
yes‘Evaṁ,
sirbhante’.
this tooAyampi,
mendicantsbhikkhave,
of formsrūpānaṁ
drawbackādīnavo.
And what is the drawback of forms? Suppose that some time later you were to see that same sister—eighty, ninety, or a hundred years old—bent double, crooked, leaning on a staff, trembling as they walk, ailing, past their prime, with teeth broken, hair grey and scanty or bald, skin wrinkled, and limbs blotchy. What do you think, mendicants? Has not that former beauty vanished and the drawback become clear?” “Yes, sir.” “This is the drawback of forms.
againPuna
and furthercaparaṁ,
mendicantsbhikkhave,
that sametameva
sisterbhaginiṁ
you would seepasseyya
sickābādhikaṁ
sufferingdukkhitaṁ
gravely illbāḷhagilānaṁ,
in her ownsake
urine and fecesmuttakarīse
collapsedpalipannaṁ
lyingsemānaṁ,
by someaññehi
being picked upvuṭṭhāpiyamānaṁ,
by othersaññehi
being put downsaṁvesiyamānaṁ.
thatTaṁ
whatkiṁ
do you thinkmaññatha,
mendicantsbhikkhave,
whichyā
formerpurimā
beautysubhā
with its beautiful complexionvaṇṇanibhā
thatsā
has vanishedantarahitā,
drawbackādīnavo
has become clearpātubhūtoti?
yes‘Evaṁ,
sirbhante’.
this tooAyampi,
mendicantsbhikkhave,
of formsrūpānaṁ
drawbackādīnavo.
Furthermore, suppose that you were to see that same sister sick, suffering, gravely ill, collapsed in her own urine and feces, being picked up by some and put down by others. What do you think, mendicants? Has not that former beauty vanished and the drawback become clear?” “Yes, sir.” “This too is the drawback of forms.
furthermorePuna
andcaparaṁ,
mendicantsbhikkhave,
that sametameva
sisterbhaginiṁ
might seepasseyya
corpsesarīraṁ
in a charnel groundsivathikāya
discardedchaḍḍitaṁ—
dead for one dayekāhamataṁ
orvā
dead for two daysdvīhamataṁ
orvā
dead for three daystīhamataṁ
orvā,
bloateduddhumātakaṁ
lividvinīlakaṁ
festeringvipubbakajātaṁ.
thatTaṁ
whatkiṁ
do you thinkmaññatha,
mendicantsbhikkhave,
thatyā
formerpurimā
beautysubhā
with bright complexionvaṇṇanibhā
itsā
vanishedantarahitā,
drawbackādīnavo
become clearpātubhūtoti?
yes‘Evaṁ,
sirbhante’.
this tooAyampi,
mendicantsbhikkhave,
of formsrūpānaṁ
drawbackādīnavo.
Furthermore, suppose that you were to see that same sister as a corpse discarded in a charnel ground. And it had been dead for one, two, or three days, bloated, livid, and festering. What do you think, mendicants? Has not that former beauty vanished and the drawback become clear?” “Yes, sir.” “This too is the drawback of forms.
furthermorePuna
and moreovercaparaṁ,
monksbhikkhave,
that very onetameva
sisterbhaginiṁ
might seepasseyya
bodysarīraṁ
in a charnel groundsivathikāya
discardedchaḍḍitaṁ—
by crowskākehi
orvā
being devouredkhajjamānaṁ,
by hawkskulalehi
orvā
being devouredkhajjamānaṁ,
by vulturesgijjhehi
orvā
being devouredkhajjamānaṁ,
by heronskaṅkehi
orvā
being devouredkhajjamānaṁ,
by houndssunakhehi
orvā
being devouredkhajjamānaṁ,
by tigersbyagghehi
orvā
being devouredkhajjamānaṁ,
by leopardsdīpīhi
orvā
being devouredkhajjamānaṁ,
by jackalssiṅgālehi
orvā
being devouredkhajjamānaṁ,
variousvividhehi
orvā
by many kinds of little creaturespāṇakajātehi
being devouredkhajjamānaṁ.
thatTaṁ
whatkiṁ
do you thinkmaññatha,
monksbhikkhave,
thatyā
formerpurimā
beautifulsubhā
with lovely complexionvaṇṇanibhā
thatsā
disappearedantarahitā,
dangerādīnavo
has become manifestpātubhūtoti?
yes‘Evaṁ,
venerable sirbhante’.
this tooAyampi,
monksbhikkhave,
of formsrūpānaṁ
dangerādīnavo.
Furthermore, suppose that you were to see that same sister as a corpse discarded in a charnel ground. And it was being devoured by crows, hawks, vultures, herons, hounds, tigers, leopards, jackals, and many kinds of little creatures …
furthermorePuna
and alsocaparaṁ,
monksbhikkhave,
that sametameva
sisterbhaginiṁ
you would seepasseyya
bodysarīraṁ
in a charnel groundsivathikāya
discardedchaḍḍitaṁ—
a skeletonaṭṭhikasaṅkhalikaṁ
with flesh and bloodsamaṁsalohitaṁ
held together by sinewsnhārusambandhaṁ,
a skeletonaṭṭhikasaṅkhalikaṁ
rid of flesh but smeared with bloodnimaṁsalohitamakkhitaṁ
held together by sinewsnhārusambandhaṁ,
a skeletonaṭṭhikasaṅkhalikaṁ
rid of flesh and bloodapagatamaṁsalohitaṁ
held together by sinewsnhārusambandhaṁ,
bonesaṭṭhikāni
rid of sinewsapagatasambandhāni
scattered in every directiondisāvidisāvikkhittāni—
in one placeaññena
hand-bonehatthaṭṭhikaṁ,
in another placeaññena
foot-bonepādaṭṭhikaṁ,
in another placeaññena
ankle bonegopphakaṭṭhikaṁ,
in another placeaññena
shin-bonejaṅghaṭṭhikaṁ,
in another placeaññena
thigh-boneūruṭṭhikaṁ,
in another placeaññena
hip-bonekaṭiṭṭhikaṁ,
in another placeaññena
rib-bonephāsukaṭṭhikaṁ,
in another placeaññena
back-bonepiṭṭhiṭṭhikaṁ,
in another placeaññena
arm-bonekhandhaṭṭhikaṁ,
in another placeaññena
neck-bonegīvaṭṭhikaṁ,
in another placeaññena
jaw-bonehanukaṭṭhikaṁ,
in another placeaññena
toothdantaṭṭhikaṁ,
in another placeaññena
skullsīsakaṭāhaṁ.
thatTaṁ
whatkiṁ
you thinkmaññatha,
monksbhikkhave,
whichyā
formerpurimā
beautifulsubhā
complexion-likevaṇṇanibhā
thatsā
disappearedantarahitā,
dangerādīnavo
has appearedpātubhūtoti?
yes‘Evaṁ,
sirbhante’.
this tooAyampi,
monksbhikkhave,
of formsrūpānaṁ
dangerādīnavo.
Furthermore, suppose that you were to see that same sister as a corpse discarded in a charnel ground. And it had been reduced to a skeleton with flesh and blood, held together by sinews … A skeleton rid of flesh but smeared with blood, and held together by sinews … A skeleton rid of flesh and blood, held together by sinews … Bones rid of sinews scattered in every direction. Here a hand-bone, there a foot-bone, here an ankle bone, there a shin-bone, here a thigh-bone, there a hip-bone, here a rib-bone, there a back-bone, here an arm-bone, there a neck-bone, here a jaw-bone, there a tooth, here the skull. …
‹ Previous · Page 3 of 4 · Next ›
Lite mode — plain HTML for e-readers and old browsers. Full version