Advice from Nandaka · Translation: Bhikkhu Sujato, SuttaCentral
Parallels & more translations on SuttaCentral
this‘etaṁ
minemama,
I am thisesohamasmi,
thiseso
myme
selfattā’”ti?
no“No
indeed thishetaṁ,
sirbhante”.
that“Taṁ
whatkissa
reasonhetu”?
previously indeed“Pubbeva
by usno
thisetaṁ,
sirbhante,
trulyyathābhūtaṁ
with right wisdomsammappaññāya
well seensudiṭṭhaṁ:
these‘itipime
sixcha
exteriorbāhirā
sense fieldsāyatanā
impermanentaniccā’”ti.
good“Sādhu
goodsādhu,
sistersbhaginiyo.
thus indeed thisEvañhetaṁ,
sistersbhaginiyo,
it ishoti
for a noble discipleariyasāvakassa
trulyyathābhūtaṁ
with right wisdomsammappaññāya
seeingpassato.
thatTaṁ
what?kiṁ
do you thinkmaññatha,
sistersbhaginiyo,
eye-consciousnesscakkhuviññāṇaṁ
permanentniccaṁ
orvā
impermanentaniccaṁ
or?vā”ti?
impermanent, sir“Aniccaṁ,
venerable sir.bhante”.
that which“Yaṁ
but is impermanentpanāniccaṁ
sufferingdukkhaṁ
orvā
thattaṁ
happinesssukhaṁ
or?vā”ti?
suffering, sir“Dukkhaṁ,
venerable sir.bhante”.
that which“Yaṁ
but is impermanentpanāniccaṁ
sufferingdukkhaṁ
perishablevipariṇāmadhammaṁ,
fitkallaṁ
nownu
thattaṁ
to be regardedsamanupassituṁ:
this‘etaṁ
minemama,
this I amesohamasmi,
thiseso
myme
selfattā’”ti?
no“No
this indeedhetaṁ,
venerable sir.bhante”.
that“Taṁ
what?kiṁ
do you thinkmaññatha,
sistersbhaginiyo,
ear-consciousnesssotaviññāṇaṁ
permanentniccaṁ
orvā
impermanentaniccaṁ
or?vā”ti?
impermanent“Aniccaṁ,
sir …pe…bhante
…pe……pe…
nose-consciousnessghānaviññāṇaṁ
permanentniccaṁ
orvā
impermanentaniccaṁ
or?vā”ti?
impermanent“Aniccaṁ,
sir …bhante”
……
tongue-consciousness“jivhāviññāṇaṁ
permanentniccaṁ
orvā
impermanentaniccaṁ
or?vā”ti?
impermanent“Aniccaṁ,
sir …bhante”
……
body-consciousness“kāyaviññāṇaṁ
permanentniccaṁ
orvā
impermanentaniccaṁ
or?vā”ti?
impermanent“Aniccaṁ,
sir …bhante”
……
mind-consciousness“manoviññāṇaṁ
permanentniccaṁ
orvā
impermanentaniccaṁ
or?vā”ti?
impermanent, sir.“Aniccaṁ,
venerable sir.bhante”.
that which“Yaṁ
but is impermanentpanāniccaṁ
sufferingdukkhaṁ
orvā
thattaṁ
happinesssukhaṁ
or?vāti”?
suffering, sir.“Dukkhaṁ,
venerable sir.bhante”.
that which“Yaṁ
but is impermanentpanāniccaṁ
sufferingdukkhaṁ
perishablevipariṇāmadhammaṁ,
fitkallaṁ
nownu
thattaṁ
to be regardedsamanupassituṁ:
'this‘etaṁ
minemama,
I am thisesohamasmi,
thiseso
myme
self'?attā’”ti?
No“No
indeed thishetaṁ,
sir.bhante”.
That“Taṁ
whatkissa
is the cause?hetu”?
previously“Pubbeva
weno
this,etaṁ,
sir,bhante,
as it really isyathābhūtaṁ
with right wisdomsammappaññāya
well seen:sudiṭṭhaṁ:
'so these‘itipime
sixcha
classes of consciousnessviññāṇakāyā
are impermanent.'aniccā’”ti.
Good“Sādhu
good,sādhu,
sisters.bhaginiyo.
Thus indeed this,Evañhetaṁ,
sisters,bhaginiyo,
ishoti
for a noble discipleariyasāvakassa
as it really isyathābhūtaṁ
with right wisdomsammappaññāya
seeing.passato.
just asSeyyathāpi,
sistersbhaginiyo,
of an oil lamptelappadīpassa
burningjhāyato
the oil tootelampi
impermanentaniccaṁ
perishablevipariṇāmadhammaṁ,
the wick toovaṭṭipi
impermanentaniccā
perishablevipariṇāmadhammā,
the flame tooaccipi
impermanentaniccā
perishablevipariṇāmadhammā,
the light tooābhāpi
impermanentaniccā
perishablevipariṇāmadhammā.
whoYo
nownu
indeedkho,
sistersbhaginiyo,
thusevaṁ
would sayvadeyya:
of that‘amussa
of an oil lamptelappadīpassa
burningjhāyato
the oil tootelampi
impermanentaniccaṁ
perishablevipariṇāmadhammaṁ,
the wick toovaṭṭipi
impermanentaniccā
perishablevipariṇāmadhammā,
the flame tooaccipi
impermanentaniccā
perishablevipariṇāmadhammā;
whichyā
andca
but itskhvāssa
its lightābhā
thatsā
permanentniccā
lastingdhuvā
eternalsassatā
imperishableavipariṇāmadhammā’ti;
rightlysammā
nownu
indeedkho
heso,
sistersbhaginiyo,
speakingvadamāno
would sayvadeyyā”ti?
No“No
for thishetaṁ,
sirbhante”.
that“Taṁ
of whatkissa
reasonhetu”?
of that“Amussa
forhi,
sirbhante,
of an oil lamptelappadīpassa
burningjhāyato
the oil tootelampi
impermanentaniccaṁ
perishablevipariṇāmadhammaṁ,
the wick toovaṭṭipi
impermanentaniccā
perishablevipariṇāmadhammā,
the flame tooaccipi
impermanentaniccā
perishablevipariṇāmadhammā;
let alone itspagevassa
lightābhā
impermanentaniccā
perishablevipariṇāmadhammā”ti.
in the same way“Evameva
indeedkho,
sistersbhaginiyo,
whoyo
nownu
indeedkho
thusevaṁ
would sayvadeyya:
these six‘cha
indeed thesekhome
interiorajjhattikā
sense fieldsāyatanā
impermanentaniccā;
and whichyañca
indeedkho
sixcha
interiorajjhattike
sense fieldsāyatane
due topaṭicca
experiencespaṭisaṁvedeti
pleasantsukhaṁ
orvā
painfuldukkhaṁ
orvā
neutraladukkhamasukhaṁ
orvā
thattaṁ
permanentniccaṁ
lastingdhuvaṁ
eternalsassataṁ
imperishableavipariṇāmadhamman’ti;
rightlysammā
thennu
indeedkho
theyso,
sistersbhaginiyo,
speakingvadamāno
would speakvadeyyā”ti?
no“No
indeed thishetaṁ,
sirbhante”.
that“Taṁ
of whatkissa
reasonhetu”?
corresponding“Tajjaṁ
correspondingtajjaṁ,
sirbhante,
conditionpaccayaṁ
dependent onpaṭicca
appropriatetajjā
appropriatetajjā
feelingvedanā
ariseuppajjanti.
correspondingTajjassa
correspondingtajjassa
of the conditionpaccayassa
from cessationnirodhā
appropriatetajjā
appropriatetajjā
feelingvedanā
ceasenirujjhantī”ti.
good“Sādhu
goodsādhu,
sistersbhaginiyo.
thus indeed thisEvañhetaṁ,
sistersbhaginiyo,
ishoti
for a noble discipleariyasāvakassa
as it really isyathābhūtaṁ
with right wisdomsammappaññāya
seeingpassato.
just asSeyyathāpi,
sistersbhaginiyo,
largemahato
of a treerukkhassa
standingtiṭṭhato
having heartwoodsāravato
even the rootmūlampi
impermanentaniccaṁ
subject to changevipariṇāmadhammaṁ,
even the trunkkhandhopi
impermanentanicco
subject to changevipariṇāmadhammo,
even the branches and foliagesākhāpalāsampi
impermanentaniccaṁ
subject to changevipariṇāmadhammaṁ,
even the shadowchāyāpi
impermanentaniccā
subject to changevipariṇāmadhammā.
whoYo
nownu
indeedkho,
sistersbhaginiyo,
thusevaṁ
might sayvadeyya:
of that‘amussa
largemahato
of a treerukkhassa
standingtiṭṭhato
having heartwoodsāravato
even the rootmūlampi
impermanentaniccaṁ
subject to changevipariṇāmadhammaṁ,
even the trunkkhandhopi
impermanentanicco
subject to changevipariṇāmadhammo,
even the branches and foliagesākhāpalāsampi
impermanentaniccaṁ
subject to changevipariṇāmadhammaṁ,
whichyā
andca
but for itkhvāssa
shadowchāyā
thatsā
permanentniccā
lastingdhuvā
eternalsassatā
not subject to changeavipariṇāmadhammā’ti;
rightlysammā
nownu
indeedkho
heso,
sistersbhaginiyo,
speakingvadamāno
would speakvadeyyā”ti?
no“No
this indeedhetaṁ,
sirbhante”.
that“Taṁ
of whatkissa
is the causehetu”?
of that“Amussa
forhi,
sirbhante,
largemahato
of a treerukkhassa
standingtiṭṭhato
having heartwoodsāravato
even the rootmūlampi
impermanentaniccaṁ
subject to changevipariṇāmadhammaṁ,
even the trunkkhandhopi
impermanentanicco
subject to changevipariṇāmadhammo,
even the branches and foliagesākhāpalāsampi
impermanentaniccaṁ
subject to changevipariṇāmadhammaṁ;
let alone itspagevassa
shadowchāyā
impermanentaniccā
subject to changevipariṇāmadhammā”ti.
just so“Evameva
indeedkho,
sistersbhaginiyo,
whoyo
nownu
indeedkho
thusevaṁ
might sayvadeyya:
six‘cha
these indeedkhome
exteriorbāhirā
sense fieldsāyatanā
impermanentaniccā.
‹ Previous · Page 2 of 6 · Next ›
Lite mode — plain HTML for e-readers and old browsers. Full version