The Simile of the Snake · Translation: Bhikkhu Sujato, SuttaCentral
Parallels & more translations on SuttaCentral
heSo thusevaṁ together·along·seesamanupassanto not·existasati notna around·trembleparitassatī”ti.
Seeing in this way they’re not anxious about what doesn’t exist.”
thusEvaṁ
when saidvutte,
a certainaññataro
mendicantbhikkhu
to the Blessed Onebhagavantaṁ
said thisetadavoca:
could there be“siyā
nownu
indeedkho,
sirbhante,
externallybahiddhā
not·existingasati
anxiety?paritassanā”ti?
there can be“Siyā,
mendicant,” said the Blessed Onebhikkhū”ti—bhagavā
saidavoca.
here“Idha
mendicantbhikkhu
for someoneekaccassa
thusevaṁ
it occurshoti:
it once was‘ahu
alasvata
mineme,
thattaṁ
alasvata
mineme
not·isnatthi;
could besiyā
alasvata
mineme,
thattaṁ
but that Ivatāhaṁ
notna
do I get.”labhāmī’ti.
heSo
sorrowssocati
wearieskilamati
lamentsparidevati
beats the breasturattāḷiṁ
wailskandati
confusionsammohaṁ
to·goāpajjati.
thusEvaṁ
indeedkho,
mendicantbhikkhu,
externallybahiddhā
not·existingasati
anxietyparitassanā
there is.”hotī”ti.
When he said this, one of the mendicants said to the Buddha, “Sir, can there be anxiety about what doesn’t exist externally?” “There can, mendicant,” said the Buddha. “It’s when someone thinks, ‘Oh, it once was mine but is mine no more. Oh, it could be mine but I do not get it.’ They sorrow and wail and lament, beating their breast and falling into confusion. That’s how there is anxiety about what doesn’t exist externally.”
could be“Siyā
butpana,
venerable sirbhante,
externallybahiddhā
not existingasati
no anxietyaparitassanā”ti?
there can be“Siyā,
mendicant, said the Buddhabhikkhū”ti—bhagavā
saidavoca.
here“Idha
a mendicantbhikkhu
of someoneekaccassa
notna
thusevaṁ
it occurshoti:
it was‘ahu
indeedvata
mineme,
thattaṁ
indeedvata
mineme
is notnatthi;
could besiyā
indeedvata
mineme,
thattaṁ
indeed + Ivatāhaṁ
notna
I getlabhāmī’ti.
heSo
notna
sorrowssocati
notna
is distressedkilamati
notna
wailsparidevati
notna
beating the breasturattāḷiṁ
lamentskandati
notna
confusionsammohaṁ
falls intoāpajjati.
thusEvaṁ
indeedkho,
mendicantbhikkhu,
externallybahiddhā
not existingasati
no anxietyaparitassanā
there ishotī”ti.
“But can there be no anxiety about what doesn’t exist externally?” “There can, mendicant,” said the Buddha. “It’s when someone doesn’t think, ‘Oh, it once was mine but is mine no more. Oh, it could be mine but I do not get it.’ They don’t sorrow and wail and lament, beating their breast and falling into confusion. That’s how there is no anxiety about what doesn’t exist externally.”
there may be“Siyā
nownu
indeedkho,
venerable sirbhante,
internallyajjhattaṁ
not·beingasati
anxiety?paritassanā”ti?
there may be“Siyā,
mendicant + Blessed Onebhikkhū”ti—bhagavā
saidavoca.
here,”“Idha,
mendicantbhikkhu,
of someoneekaccassa
suchevaṁ
viewdiṭṭhi
ishoti:
that‘so
cosmosloko
thatso
selfattā,
thatso
after·departingpecca
I will bebhavissāmi
permanentnicco
everlastingdhuvo
eternalsassato
imperishableavipariṇāmadhammo,
eternal·samesassatisamaṁ
so·justtatheva
I will remain.'ṭhassāmī’ti.
heSo
hearssuṇāti
thus·gonetathāgatassa
orvā
thus·gone·discipletathāgatasāvakassa
orvā
of allsabbesaṁ
grounds, fixations, obsessions, insistences, and underlying tendencies regarding viewsdiṭṭhiṭṭhānādhiṭṭhānapariyuṭṭhānābhinivesānusayānaṁ
completely·uprootsamugghātāya
all·activities·stillingsabbasaṅkhārasamathāya
for the letting go of all attachmentssabbūpadhipaṭinissaggāya
craving·endingtaṇhākkhayāya
away·colorvirāgāya
down·stopnirodhāya
for extinguishmentnibbānāya
Dhammadhammaṁ
teachingdesentassa.
to himTassa
suchevaṁ
ishoti:
I will be annihilated‘ucchijjissāmi
alas,nāmassu,
I will be destroyedvinassissāmi
alas,nāmassu,
not·indeednassu
indeednāma
I will be.'bhavissāmī’ti.
heSo
sorrowssocati
is wearykilamati
around·mournparidevati
chest·beatingurattāḷiṁ
wailskandati
completely·delusionsammohaṁ
toward·goāpajjati.
thusEvaṁ
indeedkho,
mendicantbhikkhu,
internallyajjhattaṁ
not·beingasati
anxietyparitassanā
is.”hotī”ti.
“But can there be anxiety about what doesn’t exist internally?” “There can, mendicant,” said the Buddha. “It’s when someone has such a view: ‘The cosmos and the self are one and the same. After death I will be that, permanent, everlasting, eternal, imperishable, and will last forever and ever.’ They hear the Realized One or their disciple teaching Dhamma for the uprooting of all grounds, fixations, obsessions, insistences, and underlying tendencies regarding views; for the stilling of all activities, the letting go of all attachments, the ending of craving, fading away, cessation, extinguishment. They think, ‘Whoa, I’m going to be annihilated and destroyed! I won’t even exist any more!’ They sorrow and wail and lament, beating their breast and falling into confusion. That’s how there is anxiety about what doesn’t exist internally.”
may it be“Siyā
butpana,
reverend sirbhante,
internallyajjhattaṁ
not·existingasati
not·anxietyaparitassanā”ti?
it may be“Siyā,
monksbhikkhū”ti
the Blessed Onebhagavā
saidavoca.
here“Idha,
monkbhikkhu,
for someoneekaccassa
notna
thusevaṁ
viewdiṭṭhi
there ishoti:
that‘so
the cosmosloko
thatso
selfattā,
thatso
after deathpecca
I will bebhavissāmi
permanentnicco
everlastingdhuvo
eternalsassato
not·change·natureavipariṇāmadhammo,
eternal·samesassatisamaṁ
so·justtatheva
I will lastṭhassāmī’ti.
heSo
hearssuṇāti
of the Realized Onetathāgatassa
orvā
Realized One·discipletathāgatasāvakassa
orvā
of allsabbesaṁ
grounds, fixations, obsessions, insistences, and underlying tendencies regarding viewsdiṭṭhiṭṭhānādhiṭṭhānapariyuṭṭhānābhinivesānusayānaṁ
for the uprootingsamugghātāya
all·activities·stillingsabbasaṅkhārasamathāya
for the letting go of all attachmentssabbūpadhipaṭinissaggāya
craving·endingtaṇhākkhayāya
for fading awayvirāgāya
for cessationnirodhāya
for extinguishmentnibbānāya
dhammadhammaṁ
teachingdesentassa.
to himTassa
notna
thusevaṁ
there ishoti:
I will be annihilated‘ucchijjissāmi
whoanāmassu,
I will be destroyedvinassissāmi
whoanāmassu,
whoanassu
indeednāma
I will bebhavissāmī’ti.
heSo
notna
sorrowssocati
notna
is wearykilamati
notna
wailsparidevati
notna
beating their breasturattāḷiṁ
lamentskandati
notna
confusionsammohaṁ
falls intoāpajjati.
thusEvaṁ
indeedkho,
monkbhikkhu,
internallyajjhattaṁ
not·existingasati
not·anxietyaparitassanā
there ishoti.
“But can there be no anxiety about what doesn’t exist internally?” “There can,” said the Buddha. “It’s when someone doesn’t have such a view: ‘The cosmos and the self are one and the same. After death I will be that, permanent, everlasting, eternal, imperishable, and will last forever and ever.’ They hear the Realized One or their disciple teaching Dhamma for the uprooting of all grounds, fixations, obsessions, insistences, and underlying tendencies regarding views; for the stilling of all activities, the letting go of all attachments, the ending of craving, fading away, cessation, extinguishment. They don’t think, ‘Whoa, I’m going to be annihilated and destroyed! I won’t even exist any more!’ They don’t sorrow and wail and lament, beating their breast and falling into confusion. That’s how there is no anxiety about what doesn’t exist internally.
thatTaṁ,
mendicantsbhikkhave,
possessionpariggahaṁ
would be possessive aboutpariggaṇheyyātha,
which would beyvāssa
possessionpariggaho
permanentnicco
everlastingdhuvo
eternalsassato
imperishableavipariṇāmadhammo,
eternally the samesassatisamaṁ
just sotatheva
would remaintiṭṭheyya.
do you seePassatha
indeedno
youtumhe,
mendicantsbhikkhave,
thattaṁ
possessionpariggahaṁ
which would beyvāssa
possessionpariggaho
permanentnicco
everlastingdhuvo
eternalsassato
imperishableavipariṇāmadhammo,
eternally the samesassatisamaṁ
just sotatheva
would remaintiṭṭheyyā”ti?
no“No
indeed thishetaṁ,
sirbhante”.
good“Sādhu,
mendicantsbhikkhave.
I alsoAhampi
indeedkho
thattaṁ,
mendicantsbhikkhave,
possessionpariggahaṁ
notna
I seesamanupassāmi
which would beyvāssa
possessionpariggaho
permanentnicco
everlastingdhuvo
eternalsassato
imperishableavipariṇāmadhammo
eternally the samesassatisamaṁ
just sotatheva
would remaintiṭṭheyya.
Mendicants, it would make sense to be possessive about something that’s permanent, everlasting, eternal, imperishable, and will last forever and ever. But do you see any such possession?” “No, sir.” “Good, mendicants! I also can’t see any such possession.
that,Taṁ,
O monks,bhikkhave,
self-theory graspingattavādupādānaṁ
you might graspupādiyetha,
because of whichyaṁsa
self-theory graspingattavādupādānaṁ
for one graspingupādiyato
notna
up·ariseuppajjeyyuṁ
sorrow-lamentation-pain-sadness-distress.sokaparidevadukkhadomanassupāyāsā.
Do you seePassatha
indeedno
you,tumhe,
O monks,bhikkhave,
thattaṁ
self-theory graspingattavādupādānaṁ
because of whichyaṁsa
self-theory graspingattavādupādānaṁ
for one graspingupādiyato
notna
up·ariseuppajjeyyuṁ
sorrow-lamentation-pain-sadness-distress?”sokaparidevadukkhadomanassupāyāsā”ti?
“No,“No
indeed, sir,hetaṁ,
sir”.bhante”.
“Good,“Sādhu,
O monks.bhikkhave.
I + tooAhampi
indeedkho
that,taṁ,
O monks,bhikkhave,
self-theory graspingattavādupādānaṁ
notna
together·along·seesamanupassāmi
because of whichyaṁsa
self-theory graspingattavādupādānaṁ
for one graspingupādiyato
notna
up·ariseuppajjeyyuṁ
sorrow-lamentation-pain-sadness-distress.sokaparidevadukkhadomanassupāyāsā.
It would make sense to grasp at a theory of self that didn’t give rise to sorrow, lamentation, pain, sadness, and distress. But do you see any such theory of self?” “No, sir.” “Good, mendicants! I also can’t see any such theory of self.
thatTaṁ,
monksbhikkhave,
view·reliancediṭṭhinissayaṁ
down·relynissayetha
whichyaṁsa
view·reliancediṭṭhinissayaṁ
down·relynissayato
notna
up·ariseuppajjeyyuṁ
sorrow·lamentation·pain·sadness·distresssokaparidevadukkhadomanassupāyāsā.
do you seePassatha
indeedno
youtumhe,
monksbhikkhave,
thattaṁ
view·reliancediṭṭhinissayaṁ
whichyaṁsa
view·reliancediṭṭhinissayaṁ
down·relynissayato
notna
up·ariseuppajjeyyuṁ
sorrow·lamentation·pain·sadness·distresssokaparidevadukkhadomanassupāyāsā”ti?
no“No
indeedhetaṁ,
sirbhante”.
good“Sādhu,
monksbhikkhave.
I tooAhampi
indeedkho
thattaṁ,
monksbhikkhave,
view·reliancediṭṭhinissayaṁ
notna
together·along·seesamanupassāmi
whichyaṁsa
view·reliancediṭṭhinissayaṁ
down·relynissayato
notna
up·ariseuppajjeyyuṁ
sorrow·lamentation·pain·sadness·distresssokaparidevadukkhadomanassupāyāsā.
It would make sense to rely on a view that didn’t give rise to sorrow, lamentation, pain, sadness, and distress. But do you see any such view to rely on?” “No, sir.” “Good, mendicants! I also can’t see any such view to rely on.
in a selfAttani
orvā,
mendicantsbhikkhave,
existingsati
'belonging to self'‘attaniyaṁ
'mine'me’ti
would there be?'assā”ti?
"yes,“Evaṁ,
sir".bhante”.
in what belongs to a self“Attaniye
orvā,
mendicantsbhikkhave,
existingsati
'my self'‘attā
'mine'me’ti
would there be?'assā”ti?
"yes,“Evaṁ,
sir".bhante”.
a self“Attani
andca,
mendicantsbhikkhave,
what belongs to a selfattaniye
andca
as a genuine factsaccato
as firm factthetato
not being foundanupalabbhamāne,
which indeedyampi
thattaṁ
view·positiondiṭṭhiṭṭhānaṁ:
'that‘so
worldloko
thatso
self,attā,
thatso
after deathpecca
I will bebhavissāmi
permanent,nicco
everlasting,dhuvo
eternal,sassato
not·change·natureavipariṇāmadhammo,
eternal·samesassatisamaṁ
just sotatheva
will stand'—ṭhassāmī’ti—
not + thisnanāyaṁ,
mendicantsbhikkhave,
totallykevalo
completeparipūro
foolish teaching"?bāladhammo”ti?
"how could it not be,“Kiñhi
indeedno
would it be,siyā,
sir,bhante,
totallykevalo
indeed,hi,
sir,bhante,
completeparipūro
foolish teaching".bāladhammo”ti.
Mendicants, were a self to exist, would there be the thought, ‘Belonging to my self’?” “Yes, sir.” “Were what belongs to a self to exist, would there be the thought, ‘My self’?” “Yes, sir.” “But since a self and what belongs to a self are not found as a genuine fact, is not the following a totally foolish teaching: ‘The cosmos and the self are one and the same. After death I will be that, permanent, everlasting, eternal, imperishable, and will last forever and ever’?” “How could it not, sir? It’s a totally foolish teaching.”
‹ Previous · Page 5 of 7 · Next ›
Lite mode — plain HTML for e-readers and old browsers. Full version