The Simile of the Snake · Translation: Bhikkhu Sujato, SuttaCentral
Parallels & more translations on SuttaCentral
So evaṁ samanupassanto asati na paritassatī”ti.
Seeing in this way they’re not anxious about what doesn’t exist.”
Evaṁ
vutte,
aññataro
bhikkhu
bhagavantaṁ
etadavoca:
“siyā
nu
kho,
bhante,
bahiddhā
asati
paritassanā”ti?
“Siyā,
bhikkhū”ti—bhagavā
avoca.
“Idha
bhikkhu
ekaccassa
evaṁ
hoti:
‘ahu
vata
me,
taṁ
vata
me
natthi;
siyā
vata
me,
taṁ
vatāhaṁ
na
labhāmī’ti.
So
socati
kilamati
paridevati
urattāḷiṁ
kandati
sammohaṁ
āpajjati.
Evaṁ
kho,
bhikkhu,
bahiddhā
asati
paritassanā
hotī”ti.
When he said this, one of the mendicants said to the Buddha, “Sir, can there be anxiety about what doesn’t exist externally?” “There can, mendicant,” said the Buddha. “It’s when someone thinks, ‘Oh, it once was mine but is mine no more. Oh, it could be mine but I do not get it.’ They sorrow and wail and lament, beating their breast and falling into confusion. That’s how there is anxiety about what doesn’t exist externally.”
“Siyā
pana,
bhante,
bahiddhā
asati
aparitassanā”ti?
“Siyā,
bhikkhū”ti—bhagavā
avoca.
“Idha
bhikkhu
ekaccassa
na
evaṁ
hoti:
‘ahu
vata
me,
taṁ
vata
me
natthi;
siyā
vata
me,
taṁ
vatāhaṁ
na
labhāmī’ti.
So
na
socati
na
kilamati
na
paridevati
na
urattāḷiṁ
kandati
na
sammohaṁ
āpajjati.
Evaṁ
kho,
bhikkhu,
bahiddhā
asati
aparitassanā
hotī”ti.
“But can there be no anxiety about what doesn’t exist externally?” “There can, mendicant,” said the Buddha. “It’s when someone doesn’t think, ‘Oh, it once was mine but is mine no more. Oh, it could be mine but I do not get it.’ They don’t sorrow and wail and lament, beating their breast and falling into confusion. That’s how there is no anxiety about what doesn’t exist externally.”
“Siyā
nu
kho,
bhante,
ajjhattaṁ
asati
paritassanā”ti?
“Siyā,
bhikkhū”ti—bhagavā
avoca.
“Idha,
bhikkhu,
ekaccassa
evaṁ
diṭṭhi
hoti:
‘so
loko
so
attā,
so
pecca
bhavissāmi
nicco
dhuvo
sassato
avipariṇāmadhammo,
sassatisamaṁ
tatheva
ṭhassāmī’ti.
So
suṇāti
tathāgatassa
vā
tathāgatasāvakassa
vā
sabbesaṁ
diṭṭhiṭṭhānādhiṭṭhānapariyuṭṭhānābhinivesānusayānaṁ
samugghātāya
sabbasaṅkhārasamathāya
sabbūpadhipaṭinissaggāya
taṇhākkhayāya
virāgāya
nirodhāya
nibbānāya
dhammaṁ
desentassa.
Tassa
evaṁ
hoti:
‘ucchijjissāmi
nāmassu,
vinassissāmi
nāmassu,
nassu
nāma
bhavissāmī’ti.
So
socati
kilamati
paridevati
urattāḷiṁ
kandati
sammohaṁ
āpajjati.
Evaṁ
kho,
bhikkhu,
ajjhattaṁ
asati
paritassanā
hotī”ti.
“But can there be anxiety about what doesn’t exist internally?” “There can, mendicant,” said the Buddha. “It’s when someone has such a view: ‘The cosmos and the self are one and the same. After death I will be that, permanent, everlasting, eternal, imperishable, and will last forever and ever.’ They hear the Realized One or their disciple teaching Dhamma for the uprooting of all grounds, fixations, obsessions, insistences, and underlying tendencies regarding views; for the stilling of all activities, the letting go of all attachments, the ending of craving, fading away, cessation, extinguishment. They think, ‘Whoa, I’m going to be annihilated and destroyed! I won’t even exist any more!’ They sorrow and wail and lament, beating their breast and falling into confusion. That’s how there is anxiety about what doesn’t exist internally.”
“Siyā
pana,
bhante,
ajjhattaṁ
asati
aparitassanā”ti?
“Siyā,
bhikkhū”ti
bhagavā
avoca.
“Idha,
bhikkhu,
ekaccassa
na
evaṁ
diṭṭhi
hoti:
‘so
loko
so
attā,
so
pecca
bhavissāmi
nicco
dhuvo
sassato
avipariṇāmadhammo,
sassatisamaṁ
tatheva
ṭhassāmī’ti.
So
suṇāti
tathāgatassa
vā
tathāgatasāvakassa
vā
sabbesaṁ
diṭṭhiṭṭhānādhiṭṭhānapariyuṭṭhānābhinivesānusayānaṁ
samugghātāya
sabbasaṅkhārasamathāya
sabbūpadhipaṭinissaggāya
taṇhākkhayāya
virāgāya
nirodhāya
nibbānāya
dhammaṁ
desentassa.
Tassa
na
evaṁ
hoti:
‘ucchijjissāmi
nāmassu,
vinassissāmi
nāmassu,
nassu
nāma
bhavissāmī’ti.
So
na
socati
na
kilamati
na
paridevati
na
urattāḷiṁ
kandati
na
sammohaṁ
āpajjati.
Evaṁ
kho,
bhikkhu,
ajjhattaṁ
asati
aparitassanā
hoti.
“But can there be no anxiety about what doesn’t exist internally?” “There can,” said the Buddha. “It’s when someone doesn’t have such a view: ‘The cosmos and the self are one and the same. After death I will be that, permanent, everlasting, eternal, imperishable, and will last forever and ever.’ They hear the Realized One or their disciple teaching Dhamma for the uprooting of all grounds, fixations, obsessions, insistences, and underlying tendencies regarding views; for the stilling of all activities, the letting go of all attachments, the ending of craving, fading away, cessation, extinguishment. They don’t think, ‘Whoa, I’m going to be annihilated and destroyed! I won’t even exist any more!’ They don’t sorrow and wail and lament, beating their breast and falling into confusion. That’s how there is no anxiety about what doesn’t exist internally.
Taṁ,
bhikkhave,
pariggahaṁ
pariggaṇheyyātha,
yvāssa
pariggaho
nicco
dhuvo
sassato
avipariṇāmadhammo,
sassatisamaṁ
tatheva
tiṭṭheyya.
Passatha
no
tumhe,
bhikkhave,
taṁ
pariggahaṁ
yvāssa
pariggaho
nicco
dhuvo
sassato
avipariṇāmadhammo,
sassatisamaṁ
tatheva
tiṭṭheyyā”ti?
“No
hetaṁ,
bhante”.
“Sādhu,
bhikkhave.
Ahampi
kho
taṁ,
bhikkhave,
pariggahaṁ
na
samanupassāmi
yvāssa
pariggaho
nicco
dhuvo
sassato
avipariṇāmadhammo
sassatisamaṁ
tatheva
tiṭṭheyya.
Mendicants, it would make sense to be possessive about something that’s permanent, everlasting, eternal, imperishable, and will last forever and ever. But do you see any such possession?” “No, sir.” “Good, mendicants! I also can’t see any such possession.
Taṁ,
bhikkhave,
attavādupādānaṁ
upādiyetha,
yaṁsa
attavādupādānaṁ
upādiyato
na
uppajjeyyuṁ
sokaparidevadukkhadomanassupāyāsā.
Passatha
no
tumhe,
bhikkhave,
taṁ
attavādupādānaṁ
yaṁsa
attavādupādānaṁ
upādiyato
na
uppajjeyyuṁ
sokaparidevadukkhadomanassupāyāsā”ti?
“No
hetaṁ,
bhante”.
“Sādhu,
bhikkhave.
Ahampi
kho
taṁ,
bhikkhave,
attavādupādānaṁ
na
samanupassāmi
yaṁsa
attavādupādānaṁ
upādiyato
na
uppajjeyyuṁ
sokaparidevadukkhadomanassupāyāsā.
It would make sense to grasp at a theory of self that didn’t give rise to sorrow, lamentation, pain, sadness, and distress. But do you see any such theory of self?” “No, sir.” “Good, mendicants! I also can’t see any such theory of self.
Taṁ,
bhikkhave,
diṭṭhinissayaṁ
nissayetha
yaṁsa
diṭṭhinissayaṁ
nissayato
na
uppajjeyyuṁ
sokaparidevadukkhadomanassupāyāsā.
Passatha
no
tumhe,
bhikkhave,
taṁ
diṭṭhinissayaṁ
yaṁsa
diṭṭhinissayaṁ
nissayato
na
uppajjeyyuṁ
sokaparidevadukkhadomanassupāyāsā”ti?
“No
hetaṁ,
bhante”.
“Sādhu,
bhikkhave.
Ahampi
kho
taṁ,
bhikkhave,
diṭṭhinissayaṁ
na
samanupassāmi
yaṁsa
diṭṭhinissayaṁ
nissayato
na
uppajjeyyuṁ
sokaparidevadukkhadomanassupāyāsā.
It would make sense to rely on a view that didn’t give rise to sorrow, lamentation, pain, sadness, and distress. But do you see any such view to rely on?” “No, sir.” “Good, mendicants! I also can’t see any such view to rely on.
Attani
vā,
bhikkhave,
sati
‘attaniyaṁ
me’ti
assā”ti?
“Evaṁ,
bhante”.
“Attaniye
vā,
bhikkhave,
sati
‘attā
me’ti
assā”ti?
“Evaṁ,
bhante”.
“Attani
ca,
bhikkhave,
attaniye
ca
saccato
thetato
anupalabbhamāne,
yampi
taṁ
diṭṭhiṭṭhānaṁ:
‘so
loko
so
attā,
so
pecca
bhavissāmi
nicco
dhuvo
sassato
avipariṇāmadhammo,
sassatisamaṁ
tatheva
ṭhassāmī’ti—
nanāyaṁ,
bhikkhave,
kevalo
paripūro
bāladhammo”ti?
“Kiñhi
no
siyā,
bhante,
kevalo
hi,
bhante,
paripūro
bāladhammo”ti.
Mendicants, were a self to exist, would there be the thought, ‘Belonging to my self’?” “Yes, sir.” “Were what belongs to a self to exist, would there be the thought, ‘My self’?” “Yes, sir.” “But since a self and what belongs to a self are not found as a genuine fact, is not the following a totally foolish teaching: ‘The cosmos and the self are one and the same. After death I will be that, permanent, everlasting, eternal, imperishable, and will last forever and ever’?” “How could it not, sir? It’s a totally foolish teaching.”
‹ Previous · Page 5 of 7 · Next ›
Lite mode — plain HTML for e-readers and old browsers. Full version