The Simile of the Snake · Translation: Bhikkhu Sujato, SuttaCentral
Parallels & more translations on SuttaCentral
heSo thusevaṁ seeingsamanupassanto in what does not existasati notna they are anxiousparitassatī”ti.
thusEvaṁ
when saidvutte,
a certainaññataro
mendicantbhikkhu
to the Blessed Onebhagavantaṁ
said thisetadavoca:
could there be“siyā
nownu
indeedkho,
sirbhante,
externallybahiddhā
not existingasati
anxiety?paritassanā”ti?
there can be“Siyā,
mendicant,” said the Blessed Onebhikkhū”ti—bhagavā
saidavoca.
here“Idha
mendicantbhikkhu
for someoneekaccassa
thusevaṁ
it occurshoti:
it once was‘ahu
alasvata
mineme,
thattaṁ
alasvata
mineme
is notnatthi;
could besiyā
alasvata
mineme,
thattaṁ
but that Ivatāhaṁ
notna
do I get.”labhāmī’ti.
heSo
sorrowssocati
wearieskilamati
lamentsparidevati
beats the breasturattāḷiṁ
wailskandati
confusionsammohaṁ
falls intoāpajjati.
thusEvaṁ
indeedkho,
mendicantbhikkhu,
externallybahiddhā
not existingasati
anxietyparitassanā
there is.”hotī”ti.
could be“Siyā
butpana,
venerable sirbhante,
externallybahiddhā
not existingasati
no anxietyaparitassanā”ti?
there can be“Siyā,
mendicant, said the Buddhabhikkhū”ti—bhagavā
saidavoca.
here“Idha
a mendicantbhikkhu
of someoneekaccassa
notna
thusevaṁ
it occurshoti:
it was‘ahu
indeedvata
mineme,
thattaṁ
indeedvata
mineme
is notnatthi;
could besiyā
indeedvata
mineme,
thattaṁ
but Ivatāhaṁ
notna
I getlabhāmī’ti.
heSo
notna
sorrowssocati
notna
is distressedkilamati
notna
wailsparidevati
notna
beating the breasturattāḷiṁ
lamentskandati
notna
confusionsammohaṁ
falls intoāpajjati.
thusEvaṁ
indeedkho,
mendicantbhikkhu,
externallybahiddhā
not existingasati
no anxietyaparitassanā
there ishotī”ti.
there may be“Siyā
nownu
indeedkho,
venerable sirbhante,
internallyajjhattaṁ
not existingasati
anxiety?paritassanā”ti?
there may be“Siyā,
mendicant,” said the Blessed Onebhikkhū”ti—bhagavā
saidavoca.
here,”“Idha,
mendicantbhikkhu,
of someoneekaccassa
suchevaṁ
viewdiṭṭhi
ishoti:
that‘so
cosmosloko
thatso
selfattā,
thatso
after deathpecca
I will bebhavissāmi
permanentnicco
everlastingdhuvo
eternalsassato
imperishableavipariṇāmadhammo,
everlasting as the eternalsassatisamaṁ
just sotatheva
I will remain.'ṭhassāmī’ti.
heSo
hearssuṇāti
of the Realized Onetathāgatassa
orvā
of a disciple of the Realized Onetathāgatasāvakassa
orvā
of allsabbesaṁ
grounds, fixations, obsessions, insistences, and underlying tendencies regarding viewsdiṭṭhiṭṭhānādhiṭṭhānapariyuṭṭhānābhinivesānusayānaṁ
for the uprootingsamugghātāya
for the stilling of all activitiessabbasaṅkhārasamathāya
for the letting go of all attachmentssabbūpadhipaṭinissaggāya
for the ending of cravingtaṇhākkhayāya
for fading awayvirāgāya
for cessationnirodhāya
for extinguishmentnibbānāya
Dhammadhammaṁ
teachingdesentassa.
to himTassa
suchevaṁ
ishoti:
I will be annihilated‘ucchijjissāmi
alas,nāmassu,
I will be destroyedvinassissāmi
alas,nāmassu,
trulynassu
indeednāma
I will be.'bhavissāmī’ti.
heSo
sorrowssocati
is wearykilamati
lamentsparidevati
beating their breasturattāḷiṁ
wailskandati
into confusionsammohaṁ
fallsāpajjati.
thusEvaṁ
indeedkho,
mendicantbhikkhu,
internallyajjhattaṁ
not existingasati
anxietyparitassanā
is.”hotī”ti.
may it be“Siyā
butpana,
reverend sirbhante,
internallyajjhattaṁ
not existingasati
no anxiety?aparitassanā”ti?
it may be“Siyā,
monksbhikkhū”ti
the Blessed Onebhagavā
saidavoca.
here“Idha,
monkbhikkhu,
for someoneekaccassa
notna
thusevaṁ
viewdiṭṭhi
there ishoti:
that‘so
the cosmosloko
thatso
selfattā,
thatso
after deathpecca
I will bebhavissāmi
permanentnicco
everlastingdhuvo
eternalsassato
imperishableavipariṇāmadhammo,
just like the eternalsassatisamaṁ
just sotatheva
I will lastṭhassāmī’ti.
heSo
hearssuṇāti
of the Realized Onetathāgatassa
orvā
of the Realized One's discipletathāgatasāvakassa
orvā
of allsabbesaṁ
grounds, fixations, obsessions, insistences, and underlying tendencies regarding viewsdiṭṭhiṭṭhānādhiṭṭhānapariyuṭṭhānābhinivesānusayānaṁ
for the uprootingsamugghātāya
for the stilling of all activitiessabbasaṅkhārasamathāya
for the letting go of all attachmentssabbūpadhipaṭinissaggāya
for the ending of cravingtaṇhākkhayāya
for fading awayvirāgāya
for cessationnirodhāya
for extinguishmentnibbānāya
dhammadhammaṁ
teachingdesentassa.
to himTassa
notna
thusevaṁ
there ishoti:
I will be annihilated‘ucchijjissāmi
whoanāmassu,
I will be destroyedvinassissāmi
whoanāmassu,
whoanassu
indeednāma
I will bebhavissāmī’ti.
heSo
notna
sorrowssocati
notna
is wearykilamati
notna
wailsparidevati
notna
beating their breasturattāḷiṁ
lamentskandati
notna
confusionsammohaṁ
falls intoāpajjati.
thusEvaṁ
indeedkho,
monkbhikkhu,
internallyajjhattaṁ
not existingasati
no anxietyaparitassanā
there ishoti.
thatTaṁ,
mendicantsbhikkhave,
possessionpariggahaṁ
would be possessive aboutpariggaṇheyyātha,
which would beyvāssa
possessionpariggaho
permanentnicco
everlastingdhuvo
eternalsassato
imperishableavipariṇāmadhammo,
eternally the samesassatisamaṁ
just sotatheva
would remaintiṭṭheyya.
do you seePassatha
indeedno
youtumhe,
mendicantsbhikkhave,
thattaṁ
possessionpariggahaṁ
which would beyvāssa
possessionpariggaho
permanentnicco
everlastingdhuvo
eternalsassato
imperishableavipariṇāmadhammo,
eternally the samesassatisamaṁ
just sotatheva
would remaintiṭṭheyyā”ti?
no“No
indeed thishetaṁ,
sirbhante”.
good“Sādhu,
mendicantsbhikkhave.
I alsoAhampi
indeedkho
thattaṁ,
mendicantsbhikkhave,
possessionpariggahaṁ
notna
I seesamanupassāmi
which would beyvāssa
possessionpariggaho
permanentnicco
everlastingdhuvo
eternalsassato
imperishableavipariṇāmadhammo
eternally the samesassatisamaṁ
just sotatheva
would remaintiṭṭheyya.
that,Taṁ,
O monks,bhikkhave,
self-theory graspingattavādupādānaṁ
you might graspupādiyetha,
because of whichyaṁsa
self-theory graspingattavādupādānaṁ
for one graspingupādiyato
notna
would ariseuppajjeyyuṁ
sorrow-lamentation-pain-sadness-distress.sokaparidevadukkhadomanassupāyāsā.
Do you seePassatha
indeedno
you,tumhe,
O monks,bhikkhave,
thattaṁ
self-theory graspingattavādupādānaṁ
because of whichyaṁsa
self-theory graspingattavādupādānaṁ
for one graspingupādiyato
notna
would ariseuppajjeyyuṁ
sorrow-lamentation-pain-sadness-distress?”sokaparidevadukkhadomanassupāyāsā”ti?
“No,“No
indeed, sir,hetaṁ,
sir”.bhante”.
“Good,“Sādhu,
O monks.bhikkhave.
I tooAhampi
indeedkho
that,taṁ,
O monks,bhikkhave,
self-theory graspingattavādupādānaṁ
notna
I seesamanupassāmi
because of whichyaṁsa
self-theory graspingattavādupādānaṁ
for one graspingupādiyato
notna
would ariseuppajjeyyuṁ
sorrow-lamentation-pain-sadness-distress.sokaparidevadukkhadomanassupāyāsā.
thatTaṁ,
monksbhikkhave,
view-reliancediṭṭhinissayaṁ
you should rely onnissayetha
whichyaṁsa
view-reliancediṭṭhinissayaṁ
because of relyingnissayato
notna
would ariseuppajjeyyuṁ
sorrow, lamentation, pain, sadness, and distresssokaparidevadukkhadomanassupāyāsā.
do you seePassatha
indeedno
youtumhe,
monksbhikkhave,
thattaṁ
view-reliancediṭṭhinissayaṁ
whichyaṁsa
view-reliancediṭṭhinissayaṁ
because of relyingnissayato
notna
would ariseuppajjeyyuṁ
sorrow, lamentation, pain, sadness, and distresssokaparidevadukkhadomanassupāyāsā”ti?
no“No
indeedhetaṁ,
sirbhante”.
good“Sādhu,
monksbhikkhave.
I tooAhampi
indeedkho
thattaṁ,
monksbhikkhave,
view-reliancediṭṭhinissayaṁ
notna
I seesamanupassāmi
whichyaṁsa
view-reliancediṭṭhinissayaṁ
because of relyingnissayato
notna
would ariseuppajjeyyuṁ
sorrow, lamentation, pain, sadness, and distresssokaparidevadukkhadomanassupāyāsā.
in a selfAttani
orvā,
mendicantsbhikkhave,
existingsati
'belonging to self'‘attaniyaṁ
'mine'me’ti
would there be?'assā”ti?
"yes,“Evaṁ,
sir".bhante”.
in what belongs to a self“Attaniye
orvā,
mendicantsbhikkhave,
existingsati
'my self'‘attā
'mine'me’ti
would there be?'assā”ti?
"yes,“Evaṁ,
sir".bhante”.
a self“Attani
andca,
mendicantsbhikkhave,
what belongs to a selfattaniye
andca
as a genuine factsaccato
as firm factthetato
not being foundanupalabbhamāne,
which indeedyampi
thattaṁ
view-position:diṭṭhiṭṭhānaṁ:
'that‘so
worldloko
thatso
self,attā,
thatso
after deathpecca
I will bebhavissāmi
permanent,nicco
everlasting,dhuvo
eternal,sassato
imperishable,avipariṇāmadhammo,
everlasting assassatisamaṁ
just sotatheva
will stand'—ṭhassāmī’ti—
is this not?nanāyaṁ,
mendicantsbhikkhave,
totallykevalo
completeparipūro
foolish teaching"?bāladhammo”ti?
"how could it not be,“Kiñhi
indeedno
would it be,siyā,
sir,bhante,
totallykevalo
indeed,hi,
sir,bhante,
completeparipūro
foolish teaching".bāladhammo”ti.
‹ Previous · Page 5 of 7 · Next ›
Lite mode — plain HTML for e-readers and old browsers. Full version