All the Defilements · Translation: Bhikkhu Sujato, SuttaCentral
Parallels & more translations on SuttaCentral
Evaṁ
me
sutaṁ—
ekaṁ
samayaṁ
bhagavā
sāvatthiyaṁ
viharati
jetavane
anāthapiṇḍikassa
ārāme.
Tatra
kho
bhagavā
bhikkhū
āmantesi:
“bhikkhavo”ti.
“Bhadante”ti
te
bhikkhū
bhagavato
paccassosuṁ.
Bhagavā
etadavoca:
So I have heard. At one time the Buddha was staying near Sāvatthī in Jeta’s Grove, Anāthapiṇḍika’s monastery. There the Buddha addressed the mendicants, “Mendicants!” “Venerable sir,” they replied. The Buddha said this:
“sabbāsavasaṁvarapariyāyaṁ
vo,
bhikkhave,
desessāmi.
Taṁ
suṇātha,
sādhukaṁ
manasi
karotha,
bhāsissāmī”ti.
“Evaṁ,
bhante”ti
kho
te
bhikkhū
bhagavato
paccassosuṁ.
Bhagavā
etadavoca:
“Mendicants, I will teach you the explanation of the restraint of all defilements. Listen and apply your mind well, I will speak.” “Yes, sir,” they replied. The Buddha said this:
“Jānato
ahaṁ,
bhikkhave,
passato
āsavānaṁ
khayaṁ
vadāmi,
no
ajānato
no
apassato.
Kiñca,
bhikkhave,
jānato
kiñca
passato
āsavānaṁ
khayaṁ
vadāmi?
Yoniso
ca
manasikāraṁ
ayoniso
ca
manasikāraṁ.
Ayoniso,
bhikkhave,
manasikaroto
anuppannā
ceva
āsavā
uppajjanti,
uppannā
ca
āsavā
pavaḍḍhanti;
yoniso
ca
kho,
bhikkhave,
manasikaroto
anuppannā
ceva
āsavā
na
uppajjanti,
uppannā
ca
āsavā
pahīyanti.
“Mendicants, I say that the ending of defilements is for one who knows and sees, not for one who does not know or see. For one who knows and sees what? Rational application of mind and irrational application of mind. When you apply the mind irrationally, defilements arise, and once arisen they grow. When you apply the mind rationally, defilements don’t arise, and those that have already arisen are given up.
Atthi, bhikkhave, āsavā dassanā pahātabbā, atthi āsavā saṁvarā pahātabbā, atthi āsavā paṭisevanā pahātabbā, atthi āsavā adhivāsanā pahātabbā, atthi āsavā parivajjanā pahātabbā, atthi āsavā vinodanā pahātabbā, atthi āsavā bhāvanā pahātabbā.
Some defilements should be given up by seeing, some by restraint, some by using, some by enduring, some by avoiding, some by dispelling, and some by developing.
1. Defilements Given Up by Seeing
Katame
ca,
bhikkhave,
āsavā
dassanā
pahātabbā?
Idha,
bhikkhave,
assutavā
puthujjano
ariyānaṁ
adassāvī
ariyadhammassa
akovido
ariyadhamme
avinīto,
sappurisānaṁ
adassāvī
sappurisadhammassa
akovido
sappurisadhamme
avinīto—
manasikaraṇīye
dhamme
nappajānāti,
amanasikaraṇīye
dhamme
nappajānāti.
So
manasikaraṇīye
dhamme
appajānanto
amanasikaraṇīye
dhamme
appajānanto,
ye
dhammā
na
manasikaraṇīyā,
te
dhamme
manasi
karoti,
ye
dhammā
manasikaraṇīyā
te
dhamme
na
manasi
karoti.
And what are the defilements that should be given up by seeing? Take an unlearned ordinary person who has not seen the noble ones, and is neither skilled nor trained in the teaching of the noble ones. They’ve not seen true persons, and are neither skilled nor trained in the teaching of the true persons. They don’t understand to which things they should apply the mind and to which things they should not apply the mind. So they apply the mind to things they shouldn’t and don’t apply the mind to things they should.
Katame
ca,
bhikkhave,
dhammā
na
manasikaraṇīyā
ye
dhamme
manasi
karoti?
Yassa,
bhikkhave,
dhamme
manasikaroto
anuppanno
vā
kāmāsavo
uppajjati,
uppanno
vā
kāmāsavo
pavaḍḍhati;
anuppanno
vā
bhavāsavo
uppajjati,
uppanno
vā
bhavāsavo
pavaḍḍhati;
anuppanno
vā
avijjāsavo
uppajjati,
uppanno
vā
avijjāsavo
pavaḍḍhati—
ime
dhammā
na
manasikaraṇīyā
ye
dhamme
manasi
karoti.
Katame
ca,
bhikkhave,
dhammā
manasikaraṇīyā
ye
dhamme
na
manasi
karoti?
Yassa,
bhikkhave,
dhamme
manasikaroto
anuppanno
vā
kāmāsavo
na
uppajjati,
uppanno
vā
kāmāsavo
pahīyati;
anuppanno
vā
bhavāsavo
na
uppajjati,
uppanno
vā
bhavāsavo
pahīyati;
anuppanno
vā
avijjāsavo
na
uppajjati,
uppanno
vā
avijjāsavo
pahīyati—
ime
dhammā
manasikaraṇīyā
ye
dhamme
na
manasi
karoti.
And what are the things to which they apply the mind but should not? They are the things that, when the mind is applied to them, give rise to unarisen defilements and make arisen defilements grow: the defilements of sensual desire, desire to be reborn, and ignorance. These are the things to which they apply the mind but should not. And what are the things to which they do not apply the mind but should? They are the things that, when the mind is applied to them, do not give rise to unarisen defilements and give up arisen defilements: the defilements of sensual desire, desire to be reborn, and ignorance. These are the things to which they do not apply the mind but should.
Tassa
amanasikaraṇīyānaṁ
dhammānaṁ
manasikārā
manasikaraṇīyānaṁ
dhammānaṁ
amanasikārā
anuppannā
ceva
āsavā
uppajjanti
uppannā
ca
āsavā
pavaḍḍhanti.
So
evaṁ
ayoniso
manasi
karoti:
‘ahosiṁ
nu
kho
ahaṁ
atītamaddhānaṁ?
Na
nu
kho
ahosiṁ
atītamaddhānaṁ?
Kiṁ
nu
kho
ahosiṁ
atītamaddhānaṁ?
Kathaṁ
nu
kho
ahosiṁ
atītamaddhānaṁ?
Kiṁ
hutvā
kiṁ
ahosiṁ
nu
kho
ahaṁ
atītamaddhānaṁ?
Bhavissāmi
nu
kho
ahaṁ
anāgatamaddhānaṁ?
Na
nu
kho
bhavissāmi
anāgatamaddhānaṁ?
Kiṁ
nu
kho
bhavissāmi
anāgatamaddhānaṁ?
Kathaṁ
nu
kho
bhavissāmi
anāgatamaddhānaṁ?
Kiṁ
hutvā
kiṁ
bhavissāmi
nu
kho
ahaṁ
anāgatamaddhānan’ti?
Etarahi
vā
paccuppannamaddhānaṁ
ajjhattaṁ
kathaṅkathī
hoti:
‘ahaṁ
nu
khosmi?
No
nu
khosmi?
Kiṁ
nu
khosmi?
Kathaṁ
nu
khosmi?
Ayaṁ
nu
kho
satto
kuto
āgato?
So
kuhiṁ
gāmī
bhavissatī’ti?
Because of applying the mind to what they should not and not applying the mind to what they should, unarisen defilements arise and arisen defilements grow. This is how they apply the mind irrationally: ‘Did I exist in the past? Did I not exist in the past? What was I in the past? How was I in the past? After being what, what did I become in the past? Will I exist in the future? Will I not exist in the future? What will I be in the future? How will I be in the future? After being what, what will I become in the future?’ Or they are undecided about the present thus: ‘Am I? Am I not? What am I? How am I? This sentient being—where did it come from? And where will it go?’
Tassa
evaṁ
ayoniso
manasikaroto
channaṁ
diṭṭhīnaṁ
aññatarā
diṭṭhi
uppajjati.
‘Atthi
me
attā’ti
vā
assa
saccato
thetato
diṭṭhi
uppajjati;
‘natthi
me
attā’ti
vā
assa
saccato
thetato
diṭṭhi
uppajjati;
‘attanāva
attānaṁ
sañjānāmī’ti
vā
assa
saccato
thetato
diṭṭhi
uppajjati;
‘attanāva
anattānaṁ
sañjānāmī’ti
vā
assa
saccato
thetato
diṭṭhi
uppajjati;
‘anattanāva
attānaṁ
sañjānāmī’ti
vā
assa
saccato
thetato
diṭṭhi
uppajjati;
atha
vā
panassa
evaṁ
diṭṭhi
hoti:
‘yo
me
ayaṁ
attā
vado
vedeyyo
tatra
tatra
kalyāṇapāpakānaṁ
kammānaṁ
vipākaṁ
paṭisaṁvedeti
so
kho
pana
me
ayaṁ
attā
nicco
dhuvo
sassato
avipariṇāmadhammo
sassatisamaṁ
tatheva
ṭhassatī’ti.
Idaṁ
vuccati,
bhikkhave,
diṭṭhigataṁ
diṭṭhigahanaṁ
diṭṭhikantāraṁ
diṭṭhivisūkaṁ
diṭṭhivipphanditaṁ
diṭṭhisaṁyojanaṁ.
Diṭṭhisaṁyojanasaṁyutto,
bhikkhave,
assutavā
puthujjano
na
parimuccati
jātiyā
jarāya
maraṇena
sokehi
paridevehi
dukkhehi
domanassehi
upāyāsehi;
‘na
parimuccati
dukkhasmā’ti
vadāmi.
When they apply the mind irrationally in this way, one of the following six views arises in them and is taken as a genuine fact. The view: ‘My self survives.’ The view: ‘My self does not survive.’ The view: ‘I perceive the self with the self.’ The view: ‘I perceive what is not-self with the self.’ The view: ‘I perceive the self with what is not-self.’ Or they have such a view: ‘This self of mine is he, the one who speaks, the one who knows, who experiences the results of good and bad deeds in all the different realms. This self is permanent, everlasting, eternal, and imperishable, and will last forever and ever.’ This is called a misconception, the thicket of views, the desert of views, the twist of views, the dodge of views, the fetter of views. An unlearned ordinary person who is fettered by views is not freed from rebirth, old age, and death, from sorrow, lamentation, pain, sadness, and distress. They’re not freed from suffering, I say.
Page 1 of 3 · Next ›
Lite mode — plain HTML for e-readers and old browsers. Full version