The Shorter Discourse With Saccaka · Translation: Bhikkhu Sujato, SuttaCentral
Parallels & more translations on SuttaCentral
this‘etaṁ
minemama,
I am thisesohamasmi,
thiseso
myme
selfattā’”ti?
no“No
indeedhidaṁ,
worthybho
Gotamagotama”.
‘This is mine, I am this, this is my self’?” “No, worthy Gotama.”
that“Taṁ
whatkiṁ
do you thinkmaññasi,
Aggivessanaaggivessana,
whoyo
thennu
indeedkho
sufferingdukkhaṁ
resorted toallīno
sufferingdukkhaṁ
drawn near toupagato
sufferingdukkhaṁ
clung toajjhosito,
sufferingdukkhaṁ
this‘etaṁ
minemama,
I am thisesohamasmi,
thiseso
myme
selfattā’ti
regardssamanupassati,
wouldapi
thennu
indeedkho
heso
himselfsāmaṁ
orvā
sufferingdukkhaṁ
could completely understandparijāneyya,
sufferingdukkhaṁ
orvā
having wiped outparikkhepetvā
would livevihareyyā”ti?
how could“Kiñhi
it besiyā,
worthybho
Gotamagotama?
noNo
indeed thishidaṁ,
worthybho
Gotamagotamā”ti.
that“Taṁ
whatkiṁ
do you thinkmaññasi,
Aggivessanaaggivessana,
is it notnanu
youtvaṁ
thusevaṁ
this being sosante
sufferingdukkhaṁ
resorted toallīno
sufferingdukkhaṁ
drawn near toupagato
sufferingdukkhaṁ
clung toajjhosito,
sufferingdukkhaṁ:
this‘etaṁ
minemama,
I am thisesohamasmi,
thiseso
myme
selfattā’ti
do you regardsamanupassasī”ti?
how could“Kiñhi
notno
it besiyā,
worthybho
Gotamagotama?
so it isEvametaṁ,
worthybho
Gotamagotamā”ti.
“What do you think, Aggivessana? Consider someone who resorts, draws near, and clings to suffering, regarding it thus: ‘This is mine, I am this, this is my self.’ Would they be able to completely understand suffering themselves, or live having wiped out suffering?” “How could they? No, worthy Gotama.” “What do you think, Aggivessana? This being so, aren’t you someone who resorts, draws near, and clings to suffering, regarding it thus: ‘This is mine, I am this, this is my self’?” “How could I not? Yes, worthy Gotama.”
just as“Seyyathāpi,
Aggivessanaaggivessana,
a personpuriso
in need of heartwoodsāratthiko
seeking heartwoodsāragavesī
search for heartwoodsārapariyesanaṁ
wanderingcaramāno
sharptiṇhaṁ
axekuṭhāriṁ
having takenādāya
forestvanaṁ
would enterpaviseyya.
heSo
theretattha
would seepasseyya
bigmahantaṁ
banana trunkkadalikkhandhaṁ
straightujuṁ
youngnavaṁ
grown unskewedakukkukajātaṁ.
itTamenaṁ
at the basemūle
would cutchindeyya,
at the basemūle
having cutchetvā
at the topagge
would cutchindeyya,
at the topagge
having cutchetvā
coiled sheathspattavaṭṭiṁ
would unrollvinibbhujeyya.
heSo
theretattha
coiled sheathspattavaṭṭiṁ
unrollingvinibbhujanto
even sapwoodpheggumpi
would not findnādhigaccheyya,
how much lesskuto
heartwood?sāraṁ?
in the same wayEvameva
indeedkho
youtvaṁ,
Aggivessanaaggivessana,
by memayā
in your ownsakasmiṁ
doctrinevāde
pursuedsamanuyuñjiyamāno
pressedsamanugāhiyamāno
grilledsamanubhāsiyamāno
vacuousritto
hollowtuccho
mistakenaparaddho.
statedBhāsitā
indeedkho
butpana
by youte
thisesā,
Aggivessanaaggivessana,
in Vesālīvesāliyaṁ
in the assemblyparisati
speechvācā:
I do not‘nāhaṁ
anytaṁ
seepassāmi
asceticsamaṇaṁ
orvā
brahminbrāhmaṇaṁ
orvā,
leader of an ordersaṅghiṁ
leader of a communitygaṇiṁ
tutor of a communitygaṇācariyaṁ,
evenapi
a perfected onearahantaṁ
a fully awakened Buddhasammāsambuddhaṁ
claimingpaṭijānamānaṁ,
whoyo
by memayā
in debatevādena
debatevādaṁ
taken onsamāraddho
notna
would shakesaṅkampeyya
notna
would rocksampakampeyya
notna
would tremblesampavedheyya,
of whomyassa
notna
from the armpitskacchehi
sweatsedā
would be releasedmucceyyuṁ.
“Suppose, Aggivessana, there was a person in need of heartwood. Wandering in search of heartwood, they’d take a sharp axe and enter a forest. There they’d see a big banana trunk, straight and young and grown unskewed. They’d cut it down at the base, cut off the top, and unroll the coiled sheaths. But they wouldn’t even find sapwood, much less heartwood. In the same way, when pursued, pressed, and grilled by me on your own doctrine, you turn out to be vacuous, hollow, and mistaken. But it was you who stated before the assembly of Vesālī: ‘I don’t see any ascetic or brahmin who would not shake and rock and tremble, sweating from the armpits, were I to take them on in debate—not a leader of an order or a community, or the tutor of a community, and not even one who claims to be a perfected one, a fully awakened Buddha.
postThūṇaṁ
if Icepāhaṁ
insentientacetanaṁ
in debatevādena
debatevādaṁ
I would take onsamārabheyyaṁ
it toosāpi
by memayā
in debatevādena
debatevādaṁ
taken onsamāraddhā
would shakesaṅkampeyya
would rocksampakampeyya
would tremblesampavedheyya.
howKo
thenpana
speechvādo
human beingmanussabhūtassā’ti?
yourTuyhaṁ
indeedkho
butpana,
Aggivessanaaggivessana,
someappekaccāni
sweat dropssedaphusitāni
from foreheadnalāṭā
releasedmuttāni,
upper robeuttarāsaṅgaṁ
soaked throughvinibhinditvā
on groundbhūmiyaṁ
standingpatiṭṭhitāni.
myMayhaṁ
indeedkho
butpana,
Aggivessanaaggivessana,
there is notnatthi
nowetarahi
in bodykāyasmiṁ
sweatsedo”ti.
thusIti
the Blessed Onebhagavā
in thattasmiṁ
assemblyparisati
golden coloredsuvaṇṇavaṇṇaṁ
bodykāyaṁ
revealedvivari.
thusEvaṁ
when saidvutte,
Saccakasaccako
Nigaṇṭha’s sonnigaṇṭhaputto
silenttuṇhībhūto
dismayedmaṅkubhūto
shoulders droopingpattakkhandho
downcastadhomukho
depressedpajjhāyanto
with nothing to sayappaṭibhāno
satnisīdi.
Even an insentient post would shake and rock and tremble were I to take it on in debate. How much more then a human being!’ But sweat is pouring from your forehead; it’s soaked through your robe and drips on the ground. While I now have no sweat on my body.” So the Buddha revealed his golden body to the assembly. When this was said, Saccaka sat silent, dismayed, shoulders drooping, downcast, depressed, with nothing to say.
thenAtha
indeedkho
Dummukhadummukho
the Licchavi sonlicchaviputto
Saccakasaccakaṁ
the Nigaṇṭha sonnigaṇṭhaputtaṁ
having become silenttuṇhībhūtaṁ
having become dismayedmaṅkubhūtaṁ
with drooping shoulderspattakkhandhaṁ
with face downadhomukhaṁ
broodingpajjhāyantaṁ
at a loss for wordsappaṭibhānaṁ
having knownviditvā
the Blessed Onebhagavantaṁ
said thisetadavoca:
a simile“upamā
to memaṁ,
Blessed Onebhagavā,
it occurspaṭibhātī”ti.
let it occur“Paṭibhātu
to youtaṁ,
Dummukhadummukhā”ti
the Blessed Onebhagavā
saidavoca.
suppose“Seyyathāpi,
sirbhante,
of a villagegāmassa
orvā
of a townnigamassa
orvā
not far fromavidūre
a lotus pondpokkharaṇī.
there wasTatrāssa
a crabkakkaṭako.
thenAtha
indeedkho,
sirbhante,
severalsambahulā
boyskumārakā
orvā
girlskumārikā
orvā
from thattamhā
villagegāmā
orvā
townnigamā
orvā
having departednikkhamitvā
towards whichyena
thatsā
lotus pondpokkharaṇī
would approach ittenupasaṅkameyyuṁ;
having approachedupasaṅkamitvā
thattaṁ
lotus pondpokkharaṇiṁ
having enteredogāhetvā
thattaṁ
crabkakkaṭakaṁ
from the waterudakā
having pulled outuddharitvā
on solid groundthale
would make standpatiṭṭhāpeyyuṁ.
whateverYaññadeva
indeedhi
thatso,
sirbhante,
crabkakkaṭako
a clawaḷaṁ
would extendabhininnāmeyya
thattaṁ
that very onetadeva
thosete
boyskumārakā
orvā
girlskumārikā
orvā
with a stickkaṭṭhena
orvā
with a stonekathalena
orvā
would snap offsañchindeyyuṁ
would cracksambhañjeyyuṁ
would break offsampalibhañjeyyuṁ.
and thusEvañhi
thatso,
sirbhante,
crabkakkaṭako
by allsabbehi
clawsaḷehi
snapped offsañchinnehi
crackedsambhaggehi
broken offsampalibhaggehi
would be unableabhabbo
thattaṁ
lotus pondpokkharaṇiṁ
againpuna
to descend intootarituṁ,
just asseyyathāpi
beforepubbe.
Knowing this, the Licchavi Dummukha said to the Buddha, “A simile strikes me, Blessed One.” “Then speak as you feel inspired,” said the Buddha. “Sir, suppose there was a lotus pond not far from a town or village, and a crab lived there. Then several boys or girls would leave the town or village and go to the pond, where they’d pull out the crab and put it on solid ground. Whenever that crab extended a claw, those boys or girls would snap, crack, and break it off with a stick or a stone. And when that crab’s claws had all been snapped, cracked, and broken off it wouldn’t be able to return down into that lotus pond.
just soEvameva
indeedkho,
sirbhante,
whicheveryāni
of Saccakasaccakassa
the Jain sonnigaṇṭhaputtassa
twistsvisūkāyitāni
ducksvisevitāni
dodgesvipphanditāni
all these tootānipi
allsabbāni
by the Buddhabhagavatā
snappedsañchinnāni
crackedsambhaggāni
broken offsampalibhaggāni;
unableabhabbo
andca
nowdāni,
sirbhante,
Saccakasaccako
the Jain sonnigaṇṭhaputto
againpuna
the Buddhabhagavantaṁ
to approachupasaṅkamituṁ
that isyadidaṁ
looking for a debatevādādhippāyo”ti.
In the same way, sir, the Buddha has snapped, cracked, and broken off all Saccaka’s twists, ducks, and dodges. Now he can’t get near the Buddha again looking for a debate.”
thusEvaṁ
when this was saidvutte,
Saccakasaccako
the Nigaṇṭha's sonnigaṇṭhaputto
Dummukhadummukhaṁ
the Licchavi's sonlicchaviputtaṁ
said this to himetadavoca:
wait“āgamehi
youtvaṁ,
Dummukhadummukha,
waitāgamehi
youtvaṁ,
Dummukhadummukha,
(…)(…)
notna
wemayaṁ
with youtayā
withsaddhiṁ
we discussmantema,
hereidha
wemayaṁ
with the worthybhotā
Gotamagotamena
withsaddhiṁ
we discussmantema.
leave aside thisTiṭṭhatesā,
worthybho
Gotamagotama,
of us andamhākañceva
of others andaññesañca
of various ascetics and brahminsputhusamaṇabrāhmaṇānaṁ
statementvācā.
nonsenseVilāpaṁ
spokenvilapitaṁ
I thinkmaññe.
to what extentKittāvatā
andca
thennu
indeedkho
of the worthybhoto
Gotamagotamassa
disciplesāvako
following instructionssāsanakaro
ishoti
responding to adviceovādapatikaro
gone beyond doubttiṇṇavicikiccho
got rid of indecisionvigatakathaṅkatho
gained assurancevesārajjappatto
independent of othersaparappaccayo
in the Teacher's instructionssatthusāsane
dwellsviharatī”ti?
here“Idha,
Aggivessanaaggivessana,
mymama
disciplesāvako
whateveryaṁ
anykiñci
formrūpaṁ
past future or presentatītānāgatapaccuppannaṁ
internalajjhattaṁ
orvā
externalbahiddhā
orvā
solidoḷārikaṁ
orvā
subtlesukhumaṁ
orvā
inferiorhīnaṁ
orvā
superiorpaṇītaṁ
orvā
whateveryaṁ
fardūre
nearsantike
orvā,
allsabbaṁ
formrūpaṁ
this is not‘netaṁ
minemama,
I am not thisnesohamasmi,
notna
this is mymeso
selfattā’ti
thus thisevametaṁ
as it really isyathābhūtaṁ
with right understandingsammappaññāya
seespassati;
whateveryā
anykāci
feelingvedanā
…pe……pe…
whateveryā
anykāci
perceptionsaññā
…pe……pe…
whateverye
anykeci
choicessaṅkhārā
…pe……pe…
But Saccaka said to him, “Hold on, Dummukha, hold on! I wasn’t talking with you, I was talking with the worthy Gotama. Worthy Gotama, leave aside that statement I made—as did various other ascetics and brahmins— it was, like, just a bit of nonsense. How do you define a disciple of the worthy Gotama who follows instructions and responds to advice; who has gone beyond doubt, got rid of indecision, gained assurance, and is independent of others in the Teacher’s instructions?” “It’s when one of my disciples truly sees any kind of form at all—past, future, or present; internal or external; solid or subtle; inferior or superior; far or near: all form—with right understanding: ‘This is not mine, I am not this, this is not my self.’ They truly see any kind of feeling … perception … choices …
‹ Previous · Page 4 of 5 · Next ›
Lite mode — plain HTML for e-readers and old browsers. Full version