The Longer Discourse on the Ending of Craving · Translation: Bhikkhu Sujato, SuttaCentral
Parallels & more translations on SuttaCentral
Atha
kho
bhagavā
aññataraṁ
bhikkhuṁ
āmantesi:
“ehi
tvaṁ
bhikkhu,
mama
vacanena
sātiṁ
bhikkhuṁ
kevaṭṭaputtaṁ
āmantehi:
‘satthā
taṁ,
āvuso
sāti,
āmantetī’”ti.
“Evaṁ,
bhante”ti
kho
so
bhikkhu
bhagavato
paṭissutvā
yena
sāti
bhikkhu
kevaṭṭaputto
tenupasaṅkami;
upasaṅkamitvā
sātiṁ
bhikkhuṁ
kevaṭṭaputtaṁ
etadavoca:
“satthā
taṁ,
āvuso
sāti,
āmantetī”ti.
“Evamāvuso”ti
kho
sāti
bhikkhu
kevaṭṭaputto
tassa
bhikkhuno
paṭissutvā
yena
bhagavā
tenupasaṅkami;
upasaṅkamitvā
bhagavantaṁ
abhivādetvā
ekamantaṁ
nisīdi.
Ekamantaṁ
nisinnaṁ
kho
sātiṁ
bhikkhuṁ
kevaṭṭaputtaṁ
bhagavā
etadavoca:
“saccaṁ
kira
te,
sāti,
evarūpaṁ
pāpakaṁ
diṭṭhigataṁ
uppannaṁ:
‘tathāhaṁ
bhagavatā
dhammaṁ
desitaṁ
ājānāmi
yathā
tadevidaṁ
viññāṇaṁ
sandhāvati
saṁsarati,
anaññan’”ti?
“Evaṁ
byā
kho
ahaṁ,
bhante,
bhagavatā
dhammaṁ
desitaṁ
ājānāmi
yathā
tadevidaṁ
viññāṇaṁ
sandhāvati
saṁsarati,
anaññan”ti.
So the Buddha addressed one of the monks, “Please, monk, in my name tell the mendicant Sāti that the Teacher summons him.” “Yes, sir,” that monk replied. He went to Sāti and said to him, “Reverend Sāti, the Teacher summons you.” “Yes, reverend,” Sāti replied. He went to the Buddha, bowed, and sat down to one side. The Buddha said to him, “Is it really true, Sāti, that you have such a harmful misconception: ‘As I understand the Buddha’s teaching, it is this very same consciousness that roams and transmigrates, not another’?” “Indeed, sir. As I understand the Buddha’s teaching, it is this very same consciousness that roams and transmigrates, not another.”
“Katamaṁ
taṁ,
sāti,
viññāṇan”ti?
“Yvāyaṁ,
bhante,
vado
vedeyyo
tatra
tatra
kalyāṇapāpakānaṁ
kammānaṁ
vipākaṁ
paṭisaṁvedetī”ti.
“Kassa
nu
kho
nāma
tvaṁ,
moghapurisa,
mayā
evaṁ
dhammaṁ
desitaṁ
ājānāsi?
Nanu
mayā,
moghapurisa,
anekapariyāyena
paṭiccasamuppannaṁ
viññāṇaṁ
vuttaṁ,
aññatra
paccayā
natthi
viññāṇassa
sambhavoti?
Atha
ca
pana
tvaṁ,
moghapurisa,
attanā
duggahitena
amhe
ceva
abbhācikkhasi,
attānañca
khaṇasi,
bahuñca
apuññaṁ
pasavasi.
Tañhi
te,
moghapurisa,
bhavissati
dīgharattaṁ
ahitāya
dukkhāyā”ti.
“Sāti, what is that consciousness?” “Sir, he is the one who speaks, the one who knows, who experiences the results of good and bad deeds in all the different realms.” “Futile man, who on earth have you ever known me to teach in that way? Haven’t I said in many ways that consciousness is dependently originated, that without a cause, consciousness does not come to be? But still you misrepresent me by your wrong grasp, harm yourself, and brim with much wickedness. This will be for your lasting harm and suffering.”
Atha
kho
bhagavā
bhikkhū
āmantesi:
“Taṁ
kiṁ
maññatha,
bhikkhave,
api
nāyaṁ
sāti
bhikkhu
kevaṭṭaputto
usmīkatopi
imasmiṁ
dhammavinaye”ti?
“Kiñhi
siyā,
bhante?
No
hetaṁ,
bhante”ti.
Evaṁ
vutte,
sāti
bhikkhu
kevaṭṭaputto
tuṇhībhūto
maṅkubhūto
pattakkhandho
adhomukho
pajjhāyanto
appaṭibhāno
nisīdi.
Atha
kho
bhagavā
sātiṁ
bhikkhuṁ
kevaṭṭaputtaṁ
tuṇhībhūtaṁ
maṅkubhūtaṁ
pattakkhandhaṁ
adhomukhaṁ
pajjhāyantaṁ
appaṭibhānaṁ
viditvā
sātiṁ
bhikkhuṁ
kevaṭṭaputtaṁ
etadavoca:
“paññāyissasi
kho
tvaṁ,
moghapurisa,
etena
sakena
pāpakena
diṭṭhigatena.
Idhāhaṁ
bhikkhū
paṭipucchissāmī”ti.
Then the Buddha said to the mendicants, “What do you think, mendicants? Has this mendicant Sāti kindled even a spark of ardor in this teaching and training?” “How could that be, sir? No, sir.” When this was said, Sāti sat silent, dismayed, shoulders drooping, downcast, depressed, with nothing to say. Knowing this, the Buddha said, “Futile man, you will be known by your own harmful misconception. I’ll question the mendicants about this.”
Atha
kho
bhagavā
bhikkhū
āmantesi:
“tumhepi
me,
bhikkhave,
evaṁ
dhammaṁ
desitaṁ
ājānātha
yathāyaṁ
sāti
bhikkhu
kevaṭṭaputto
attanā
duggahitena
amhe
ceva
abbhācikkhati,
attānañca
khaṇati,
bahuñca
apuññaṁ
pasavatī”ti?
“No
hetaṁ,
bhante.
Anekapariyāyena
hi
no,
bhante,
paṭiccasamuppannaṁ
viññāṇaṁ
vuttaṁ
bhagavatā,
aññatra
paccayā
natthi
viññāṇassa
sambhavo”ti.
“Sādhu
sādhu,
bhikkhave.
Sādhu
kho
me
tumhe,
bhikkhave,
evaṁ
dhammaṁ
desitaṁ
ājānātha.
Anekapariyāyena
hi
vo,
bhikkhave,
paṭiccasamuppannaṁ
viññāṇaṁ
vuttaṁ
mayā,
aññatra
paccayā
natthi
viññāṇassa
sambhavo”ti.
Atha
ca
panāyaṁ
sāti
bhikkhu
kevaṭṭaputto
attanā
duggahitena
amhe
ceva
abbhācikkhati,
attānañca
khaṇati,
bahuñca
apuññaṁ
pasavati.
Tañhi
tassa
moghapurisassa
bhavissati
dīgharattaṁ
ahitāya
dukkhāya.
Then the Buddha said to the mendicants, “Mendicants, do you understand my teachings as Sāti does, when he misrepresents me by his wrong grasp, harms himself, and brims with much wickedness?” “No, sir. For in many ways the Buddha has told us that consciousness is dependently originated, that without a cause, consciousness does not come to be.” “Good, good, mendicants! It’s good that you understand my teaching like this. For in many ways I have told you that consciousness is dependently originated, that without a cause, consciousness does not come to be. But still this Sāti misrepresents me by his wrong grasp, harms himself, and brims with much wickedness. This will be for his lasting harm and suffering.
“Yaṁ
yadeva,
bhikkhave,
paccayaṁ
paṭicca
uppajjati
viññāṇaṁ,
tena
teneva
viññāṇantveva
saṅkhyaṁ
gacchati.
Cakkhuñca
paṭicca
rūpe
ca
uppajjati
viññāṇaṁ,
cakkhuviññāṇantveva
saṅkhyaṁ
gacchati;
sotañca
paṭicca
sadde
ca
uppajjati
viññāṇaṁ,
sotaviññāṇantveva
saṅkhyaṁ
gacchati;
ghānañca
paṭicca
gandhe
ca
uppajjati
viññāṇaṁ,
ghānaviññāṇantveva
saṅkhyaṁ
gacchati;
jivhañca
paṭicca
rase
ca
uppajjati
viññāṇaṁ,
jivhāviññāṇantveva
saṅkhyaṁ
gacchati;
kāyañca
paṭicca
phoṭṭhabbe
ca
uppajjati
viññāṇaṁ,
kāyaviññāṇantveva
saṅkhyaṁ
gacchati;
manañca
paṭicca
dhamme
ca
uppajjati
viññāṇaṁ,
manoviññāṇantveva
saṅkhyaṁ
gacchati.
Seyyathāpi,
bhikkhave,
yaṁ
yadeva
paccayaṁ
paṭicca
aggi
jalati
tena
teneva
saṅkhyaṁ
gacchati.
Kaṭṭhañca
paṭicca
aggi
jalati,
kaṭṭhaggitveva
saṅkhyaṁ
gacchati;
sakalikañca
paṭicca
aggi
jalati,
sakalikaggitveva
saṅkhyaṁ
gacchati;
tiṇañca
paṭicca
aggi
jalati,
tiṇaggitveva
saṅkhyaṁ
gacchati;
Consciousness is reckoned according to the very same condition dependent upon which it arises. Consciousness that arises dependent on the eye and sights is reckoned as eye consciousness. Consciousness that arises dependent on the ear and sounds is reckoned as ear consciousness. Consciousness that arises dependent on the nose and smells is reckoned as nose consciousness. Consciousness that arises dependent on the tongue and tastes is reckoned as tongue consciousness. Consciousness that arises dependent on the body and touches is reckoned as body consciousness. Consciousness that arises dependent on the mind and ideas is reckoned as mind consciousness. It’s like fire, which is reckoned according to the very same condition dependent upon which it burns. A fire that burns dependent on logs is reckoned as a log fire. A fire that burns dependent on twigs is reckoned as a twig fire. A fire that burns dependent on grass is reckoned as a grass fire.
‹ Previous · Page 2 of 8 · Next ›
Lite mode — plain HTML for e-readers and old browsers. Full version