The Shorter Classification · Translation: Bhikkhu Sujato, SuttaCentral
Parallels & more translations on SuttaCentral
thusEvaṁ
by meme
heardsutaṁ—
oneekaṁ
timesamayaṁ
the Blessed Onebhagavā
at Rājagaharājagahe
was stayingviharati
in the Bamboo Groveveḷuvane
at the squirrels' feeding groundkalandakanivāpe.
thenAtha
indeedkho
Visākhavisākho
laymanupāsako
whereyena
Dhammadinnādhammadinnā
nunbhikkhunī
approached hertenupasaṅkami;
having approachedupasaṅkamitvā
Dhammadinnādhammadinnaṁ
nunbhikkhuniṁ
having bowedabhivādetvā
to one sideekamantaṁ
sat downnisīdi.
to one sideEkamantaṁ
seatednisinno
indeedkho
Visākhavisākho
laymanupāsako
Dhammadinnādhammadinnaṁ
nunbhikkhuniṁ
said this to heretadavoca:
So I have heard. At one time the Buddha was staying near Rājagaha in the Bamboo Grove, the squirrels’ feeding ground. Then the layman Visākha went to see the nun Dhammadinnā, bowed, sat down to one side, and said to her:
substantial reality“‘sakkāyo
substantial reality, they saysakkāyo’ti,
ma'amayye,
is spokenvuccati.
whatKatamo
nownu
indeedkho,
ma'amayye,
substantial realitysakkāyo
spokenvutto
by the Buddhabhagavatā”ti?
five“Pañca
indeedkho
theseime,
friendāvuso
Visākhavisākha,
grasping aggregatesupādānakkhandhā
substantial realitysakkāyo
spokenvutto
by the Blessed Onebhagavatā,
that is, the grasping aggregate of formseyyathidaṁ—rūpupādānakkhandho,
grasping aggregate of feelingvedanupādānakkhandho,
grasping aggregate of perceptionsaññupādānakkhandho,
grasping aggregate of choicessaṅkhārupādānakkhandho,
grasping aggregate of consciousnessviññāṇupādānakkhandho.
theseIme
indeedkho,
friendāvuso
Visākhavisākha,
five grasping aggregatespañcupādānakkhandhā
substantial realitysakkāyo
spokenvutto
by the Blessed Onebhagavatā”ti.
Good, ma'am“Sādhayye”ti
indeedkho
Visākhavisākho
lay followerupāsako
of Dhammadinnādhammadinnāya
of the nunbhikkhuniyā
statementbhāsitaṁ
having approvedabhinanditvā
having agreedanumoditvā
Dhammadinnādhammadinnaṁ
nunbhikkhuniṁ
furtheruttariṁ
questionpañhaṁ
he askedapucchi:
“Ma’am, they speak of this thing called ‘substantial reality’. What is this substantial reality that the Buddha spoke of?” “Visākha, the Buddha said that these five grasping aggregates are substantial reality. That is, the grasping aggregates of form, feeling, perception, choices, and consciousness. The Buddha said that these five grasping aggregates are substantial reality.” Saying “Good, ma’am,” Visākha approved and agreed with what Dhammadinnā said. Then he asked another question:
‘the origin of substantial reality“‘sakkāyasamudayo
the origin of substantial reality,’sakkāyasamudayo’ti,
ma’amayye,
is spoken ofvuccati.
whatKatamo
thennu
indeedkho,
ma’amayye,
the origin of substantial realitysakkāyasamudayo
spokenvutto
by the Buddha?”bhagavatā”ti?
that which“Yāyaṁ,
friendāvuso
Visākhavisākha,
cravingtaṇhā
leading to future livesponobbhavikā
mixed up with relishing and greednandīrāgasahagatā
taking pleasure there wherever it alightstatratatrābhinandinī,
that is,seyyathidaṁ—
craving for sensual pleasureskāmataṇhā
craving for continued existencebhavataṇhā
craving for nonexistencevibhavataṇhā;
thisayaṁ
indeedkho,
friendāvuso
Visākhavisākha,
the origin of substantial realitysakkāyasamudayo
spokenvutto
by the Buddha.”bhagavatā”ti.
“Ma’am, they speak of this thing called ‘the origin of substantial reality’. What is the origin of substantial reality that the Buddha spoke of?” “It’s the craving that leads to future lives, mixed up with relishing and greed, taking pleasure there wherever it alights. That is, craving for sensual pleasures, craving for continued existence, and craving for nonexistence. The Buddha said that this is the origin of substantial reality.”
‘cessation of substantial reality“‘Sakkāyanirodho
cessation of substantial reality’,sakkāyanirodho’ti,
ma’amayye,
is spokenvuccati.
whatKatamo
thennu
indeedkho,
ma’amayye,
cessation of substantial realitysakkāyanirodho
spokenvutto
by the Buddha?”bhagavatā”ti?
which“Yo
indeedkho,
friendāvuso
Visākhavisākha,
of that very sametassāyeva
cravingtaṇhāya
fading away and cessation with no residue left behindasesavirāganirodho
giving awaycāgo
letting gopaṭinissaggo
releasingmutti
not clinginganālayo;
thisayaṁ
indeedkho,
friendāvuso
Visākhavisākha,
cessation of substantial realitysakkāyanirodho
spokenvutto
by the Buddha.”bhagavatā”ti.
“Ma’am, they speak of this thing called ‘the cessation of substantial reality’. What is the cessation of substantial reality that the Buddha spoke of?” “It’s the fading away and cessation of that very same craving with no residue left behind; giving it away, letting it go, releasing it, and not clinging to it. The Buddha said that this is the cessation of substantial reality.”
the practice leading to the cessation of substantial reality“‘Sakkāyanirodhagāminī
practicepaṭipadā
the practice leading to the cessation of substantial realitysakkāyanirodhagāminī
practicepaṭipadā’ti,
ma’amayye,
is spoken ofvuccati.
whatKatamā
thennu
indeedkho,
ma’amayye,
the practice leading to the cessation of substantial realitysakkāyanirodhagāminī
practicepaṭipadā
spokenvuttā
by the Buddhabhagavatā”ti?
this very“Ayameva
indeedkho,
friendāvuso
Visākhavisākha,
nobleariyo
eightfoldaṭṭhaṅgiko
pathmaggo
the practice leading to the cessation of substantial realitysakkāyanirodhagāminī
practicepaṭipadā
spokenvuttā
by the Buddhabhagavatā,
that isseyyathidaṁ—
right viewsammādiṭṭhi
right purposesammāsaṅkappo
right speechsammāvācā
right actionsammākammanto
right livelihoodsammāājīvo
right effortsammāvāyāmo
right mindfulnesssammāsati
right immersionsammāsamādhī”ti.
“Ma’am, they speak of the practice that leads to the cessation of substantial reality. What is the practice that leads to the cessation of substantial reality that the Buddha spoke of?” “The practice that leads to the cessation of substantial reality that the Buddha spoke of is simply this noble eightfold path, that is: right view, right purpose, right speech, right action, right livelihood, right effort, right mindfulness, and right immersion.”
that very“Taññeva
nownu
indeedkho,
ma'amayye,
graspingupādānaṁ
thosete
five grasping aggregatespañcupādānakkhandhā
orudāhu
apart fromaññatra
from the five grasping aggregatespañcahupādānakkhandhehi
grasping?upādānan”ti?
not“Na
indeedkho,
friendāvuso
Visākhavisākha,
that verytaññeva
graspingupādānaṁ
thosete
five grasping aggregatespañcupādānakkhandhā,
nornāpi
apart fromaññatra
from the five grasping aggregatespañcahupādānakkhandhehi
graspingupādānaṁ.
whichYo
indeedkho,
friendāvuso
Visākhavisākha,
in the fivepañcasu
grasping aggregatesupādānakkhandhesu
desire and greedchandarāgo
thattaṁ
theretattha
graspingupādānan”ti.
“But ma’am, is that grasping the exact same thing as the five grasping aggregates? Or is grasping one thing and the five grasping aggregates another?” “That grasping is not the exact same thing as the five grasping aggregates. Nor is grasping one thing and the five grasping aggregates another. The desire and greed for the five grasping aggregates is the grasping there.”
how?“Kathaṁ
but ma'ampanāyye,
substantialist viewsakkāyadiṭṭhi
comes about?hotī”ti?
here, friend“Idhāvuso
Visākhavisākha,
unlearnedassutavā
ordinary personputhujjano,
of the noble onesariyānaṁ
not having seenadassāvī
in the teaching of the noble onesariyadhammassa
unskilledakovido
in the teaching of the noble onesariyadhamme
untrainedavinīto,
of the true personssappurisānaṁ
not having seenadassāvī
in the teaching of the true personssappurisadhammassa
unskilledakovido
in the teaching of the true personssappurisadhamme
untrainedavinīto,
formrūpaṁ
as selfattato
regardssamanupassati,
as having formrūpavantaṁ
orvā
selfattānaṁ,
in selfattani
orvā
formrūpaṁ,
in formrūpasmiṁ
orvā
selfattānaṁ.
feelingVedanaṁ
…pe……pe…
perceptionsaññaṁ
……
choicessaṅkhāre
……
consciousnessviññāṇaṁ
as selfattato
regardssamanupassati,
as having consciousnessviññāṇavantaṁ
orvā
selfattānaṁ,
in selfattani
orvā
consciousnessviññāṇaṁ,
in consciousnessviññāṇasmiṁ
orvā
selfattānaṁ.
thusEvaṁ
indeedkho,
friendāvuso
Visākhavisākha,
substantialist viewsakkāyadiṭṭhi
comes about.hotī”ti.
“But ma’am, how does substantialist view come about?” “It’s when an unlearned ordinary person has not seen the noble ones, and is neither skilled nor trained in the teaching of the noble ones. They’ve not seen true persons, and are neither skilled nor trained in the teaching of the true persons. They regard form as self, self as having form, form in self, or self in form. They regard feeling … perception … choices … consciousness as self, self as having consciousness, consciousness in self, or self in consciousness. That’s how substantialist view comes about.”
how“Kathaṁ
but ma'ampanāyye,
substantialist viewsakkāyadiṭṭhi
notna
comes about; quotation markerhotī”ti?
here friend“Idhāvuso
Visākhavisākha,
learnedsutavā
noble discipleariyasāvako,
of the noble onesariyānaṁ
has seendassāvī
of the noble teachingariyadhammassa
skilledkovido
in the noble teachingariyadhamme
trainedsuvinīto,
of true personssappurisānaṁ
has seendassāvī
of the true persons' teachingsappurisadhammassa
skilledkovido
in the true persons' teachingsappurisadhamme
trainedsuvinīto,
notna
formrūpaṁ
as selfattato
regardssamanupassati,
notna
as having formrūpavantaṁ
orvā
selfattānaṁ,
notna
in selfattani
orvā
formrūpaṁ,
notna
in formrūpasmiṁ
orvā
selfattānaṁ.
notNa
feelingvedanaṁ
…pe……pe…
notna
perceptionsaññaṁ
……
notna
choicessaṅkhāre
…pe……pe…
notna
consciousnessviññāṇaṁ
as selfattato
regardssamanupassati,
notna
as having consciousnessviññāṇavantaṁ
orvā
selfattānaṁ,
notna
in selfattani
orvā
consciousnessviññāṇaṁ,
notna
in consciousnessviññāṇasmiṁ
orvā
selfattānaṁ.
thusEvaṁ
indeedkho,
friendāvuso
Visākhavisākha,
substantialist viewsakkāyadiṭṭhi
notna
comes about; quotation markerhotī”ti.
“But ma’am, how does substantialist view not come about?” “It’s when a learned noble disciple has seen the noble ones, and is skilled and trained in the teaching of the noble ones. They’ve seen true persons, and are skilled and trained in the teaching of the true persons. They don’t regard form as self, self as having form, form in self, or self in form. They don’t regard feeling … perception … choices … consciousness as self, self as having consciousness, consciousness in self, or self in consciousness. That’s how substantialist view does not come about.”
which?“Katamo
and ma'ampanāyye,
nobleariyo
eightfoldaṭṭhaṅgiko
path?maggo”ti?
this very“Ayameva
indeedkho,
friendāvuso
Visākhavisākha,
nobleariyo
eightfoldaṭṭhaṅgiko
pathmaggo,
that isseyyathidaṁ—
right viewsammādiṭṭhi
right purposesammāsaṅkappo
right speechsammāvācā
right actionsammākammanto
right livelihoodsammāājīvo
right effortsammāvāyāmo
right mindfulnesssammāsati
right immersion.sammāsamādhī”ti.
“But ma’am, what is the noble eightfold path?” “It is simply this noble eightfold path, that is: right view, right purpose, right speech, right action, right livelihood, right effort, right mindfulness, and right immersion.”
noble“Ariyo
but ma'ampanāyye,
eightfoldaṭṭhaṅgiko
pathmaggo
conditionedsaṅkhato
orudāhu
unconditioned?asaṅkhato”ti?
noble“Ariyo
indeedkho,
friendāvuso
Visākhavisākha,
eightfoldaṭṭhaṅgiko
pathmaggo
conditioned.saṅkhato”ti.
“But ma’am, is the noble eightfold path conditioned or unconditioned?” “The noble eightfold path is conditioned.”
by the noble“Ariyena
indeednu
indeedkho,
ladyayye,
eightfoldaṭṭhaṅgikena
by the pathmaggena
threetayo
spectrumskhandhā
includedsaṅgahitā
orudāhu
by the threetīhi
by the spectrumskhandhehi
nobleariyo
eightfoldaṭṭhaṅgiko
pathmaggo
included?saṅgahito”ti?
not“Na
indeedkho,
friendāvuso
Visākhavisākha,
by the nobleariyena
eightfoldaṭṭhaṅgikena
by the pathmaggena
threetayo
spectrumskhandhā
includedsaṅgahitā;
by the threetīhi
andca
indeedkho,
friendāvuso
Visākhavisākha,
by the spectrumskhandhehi
nobleariyo
eightfoldaṭṭhaṅgiko
pathmaggo
includedsaṅgahito.
whichYā
and, friendcāvuso
Visākhavisākha,
right speechsammāvācā
whichyo
andca
right actionsammākammanto
whichyo
andca
right livelihoodsammāājīvo
theseime
thingsdhammā
in the spectrum of ethicssīlakkhandhe
includedsaṅgahitā.
whichYo
andca
right effortsammāvāyāmo
whichyā
andca
right mindfulnesssammāsati
whichyo
andca
right immersionsammāsamādhi
theseime
thingsdhammā
in the spectrum of immersionsamādhikkhandhe
includedsaṅgahitā.
whichYā
andca
right viewsammādiṭṭhi
whichyo
andca
right purposesammāsaṅkappo,
theseime
thingsdhammā
in the spectrum of wisdompaññākkhandhe
included”saṅgahitā”ti.
“Are the three spectrums of practice included in the noble eightfold path? Or is the noble eightfold path included in the three spectrums of practice?” “The three spectrums of practice are not included in the noble eightfold path. Rather, the noble eightfold path is included in the three spectrums of practice. Right speech, right action, and right livelihood: these things are included in the spectrum of ethics. Right effort, right mindfulness, and right immersion: these things are included in the spectrum of immersion. Right view and right purpose: these things are included in the spectrum of wisdom.”
Page 1 of 3 · Next ›
Lite mode — plain HTML for e-readers and old browsers. Full version