With Upāli · Translation: Bhikkhu Sujato, SuttaCentral
Parallels & more translations on SuttaCentral
“Dasapi,
bhante,
purisā,
vīsampi,
bhante,
purisā,
tiṁsampi,
bhante,
purisā,
cattārīsampi,
bhante,
purisā,
paññāsampi,
bhante,
purisā
nappahonti
yāvatikā
imissā
nāḷandāya
pāṇā
te
ekena
khaṇena
ekena
muhuttena
ekaṁ
maṁsakhalaṁ
ekaṁ
maṁsapuñjaṁ
kātuṁ.
Kiñhi
sobhati
eko
chavo
puriso”ti.
“Taṁ
kiṁ
maññasi,
gahapati,
idha
āgaccheyya
samaṇo
vā
brāhmaṇo
vā
iddhimā
cetovasippatto.
So
evaṁ
vadeyya:
‘ahaṁ
imaṁ
nāḷandaṁ
ekena
manopadosena
bhasmaṁ
karissāmī’ti.
Taṁ
kiṁ
maññasi,
gahapati,
pahoti
nu
kho
so
samaṇo
vā
brāhmaṇo
vā
iddhimā
cetovasippatto
imaṁ
nāḷandaṁ
ekena
manopadosena
bhasmaṁ
kātun”ti?
“Dasapi,
bhante,
nāḷandā,
vīsampi
nāḷandā,
tiṁsampi
nāḷandā,
cattārīsampi
nāḷandā,
paññāsampi
nāḷandā
pahoti
so
samaṇo
vā
brāhmaṇo
vā
iddhimā
cetovasippatto
ekena
manopadosena
bhasmaṁ
kātuṁ.
“Sir, even ten, twenty, thirty, forty, or fifty men couldn’t do that. How impressive is one measly man?” “What do you think, householder? Suppose an ascetic or brahmin with psychic power, who has achieved mastery of the mind, were to come along and say: ‘I will reduce Nāḷandā to ashes with a single malevolent act of will!’ What do you think, householder? Could he do that?” “Sir, an ascetic or brahmin with psychic power, who has achieved mastery of the mind, could reduce ten, twenty, thirty, forty, or fifty Nāḷandās to ashes with a single malevolent act of will.
Kiñhi
sobhati
ekā
chavā
nāḷandā”ti.
“Manasi
karohi,
gahapati,
manasi
karitvā
kho,
gahapati,
byākarohi.
Na
kho
te
sandhiyati
purimena
vā
pacchimaṁ,
pacchimena
vā
purimaṁ.
Bhāsitā
kho
pana
te,
gahapati,
esā
vācā:
‘sacce
ahaṁ,
bhante,
patiṭṭhāya
mantessāmi;
hotu
no
ettha
kathāsallāpo’”ti.
“Kiñcāpi,
bhante,
bhagavā
evamāha,
atha
kho
kāyadaṇḍova
mahāsāvajjataro
pāpassa
kammassa
kiriyāya
pāpassa
kammassa
pavattiyā,
no
tathā
vacīdaṇḍo,
no
tathā
manodaṇḍo”ti.
“Taṁ
kiṁ
maññasi,
gahapati,
sutaṁ
te
daṇḍakīraññaṁ
kāliṅgāraññaṁ
majjhāraññaṁ
mātaṅgāraññaṁ
araññaṁ
araññabhūtan”ti?
“Evaṁ,
bhante,
sutaṁ
me
daṇḍakīraññaṁ
kāliṅgāraññaṁ
majjhāraññaṁ
mātaṅgāraññaṁ
araññaṁ
araññabhūtan”ti.
How significant is one measly Nāḷandā?” “Think about it, householder! You should think before answering. What you said before and what you said after don’t match up. But you said that you would debate on the basis of truth.” “Even though the Buddha says this, still the physical rod is the most blameworthy for performing bad deeds, not so much the verbal rod or the mental rod.” “What do you think, householder? Have you heard how the wildernesses of Daṇḍaka, Kaliṅga, Mejjha, and Mātaṅga came to be that way?” “I have, sir.”
“Taṁ
kiṁ
maññasi,
gahapati,
kinti
te
sutaṁ
kena
taṁ
daṇḍakīraññaṁ
kāliṅgāraññaṁ
majjhāraññaṁ
mātaṅgāraññaṁ
araññaṁ
araññabhūtan”ti?
“Sutaṁ
metaṁ,
bhante,
isīnaṁ
manopadosena
taṁ
daṇḍakīraññaṁ
kāliṅgāraññaṁ
majjhāraññaṁ
mātaṅgāraññaṁ
araññaṁ
araññabhūtan”ti.
“Manasi
karohi,
gahapati,
manasi
karitvā
kho,
gahapati,
byākarohi.
Na
kho
te
sandhiyati
purimena
vā
pacchimaṁ,
pacchimena
vā
purimaṁ.
Bhāsitā
kho
pana
te,
gahapati,
esā
vācā:
‘sacce
ahaṁ,
bhante,
patiṭṭhāya
mantessāmi;
hotu
no
ettha
kathāsallāpo’”ti.
“What have you heard?” “I heard that it was because of a malevolent act of will by seers that the wildernesses of Daṇḍaka, Kaliṅga, Mejjha, and Mātaṅga came to be that way.” “Think about it, householder! You should think before answering. What you said before and what you said after don’t match up. But you said that you would debate on the basis of truth.”
“Purimenevāhaṁ,
bhante,
opammena
bhagavato
attamano
abhiraddho.
Api
cāhaṁ
imāni
bhagavato
vicitrāni
pañhapaṭibhānāni
sotukāmo,
evāhaṁ
bhagavantaṁ
paccanīkaṁ
kātabbaṁ
amaññissaṁ.
Abhikkantaṁ,
bhante,
abhikkantaṁ,
bhante.
Seyyathāpi,
bhante,
nikkujjitaṁ
vā
ukkujjeyya,
paṭicchannaṁ
vā
vivareyya,
mūḷhassa
vā
maggaṁ
ācikkheyya,
andhakāre
vā
telapajjotaṁ
dhāreyya:
‘cakkhumanto
rūpāni
dakkhantī’ti;
evamevaṁ
bhagavatā
anekapariyāyena
dhammo
pakāsito.
Esāhaṁ,
bhante,
bhagavantaṁ
saraṇaṁ
gacchāmi
dhammañca
bhikkhusaṅghañca.
Upāsakaṁ
maṁ
bhagavā
dhāretu
ajjatagge
pāṇupetaṁ
saraṇaṁ
gatan”ti.
“Sir, I was already delighted and satisfied by the Buddha’s very first simile. Nevertheless, I wanted to hear the Buddha’s various solutions to the problem, so I thought I’d oppose you in this way. Excellent, sir! Excellent! As if he were righting the overturned, or revealing the hidden, or pointing out the path to the lost, or lighting a lamp in the dark so people with clear eyes can see what’s there, the Buddha has made the teaching clear in many ways. I go for refuge to the Buddha, to the teaching, and to the mendicant Saṅgha. From this day forth, may the Buddha remember me as a lay follower who has gone for refuge for life.”
“Anuviccakāraṁ
kho,
gahapati,
karohi,
anuviccakāro
tumhādisānaṁ
ñātamanussānaṁ
sādhu
hotī”ti.
“Imināpāhaṁ,
bhante,
bhagavato
bhiyyoso
mattāya
attamano
abhiraddho
yaṁ
maṁ
bhagavā
evamāha:
‘anuviccakāraṁ
kho,
gahapati,
karohi,
anuviccakāro
tumhādisānaṁ
ñātamanussānaṁ
sādhu
hotī’ti.
Mañhi,
bhante,
aññatitthiyā
sāvakaṁ
labhitvā
kevalakappaṁ
nāḷandaṁ
paṭākaṁ
parihareyyuṁ:
‘upāli
amhākaṁ
gahapati
sāvakattaṁ
upagato’ti.
Atha
ca
pana
maṁ
bhagavā
evamāha:
‘anuviccakāraṁ
kho,
gahapati,
karohi,
anuviccakāro
tumhādisānaṁ
ñātamanussānaṁ
sādhu
hotī’ti.
Esāhaṁ,
bhante,
dutiyampi
bhagavantaṁ
saraṇaṁ
gacchāmi
dhammañca
bhikkhusaṅghañca.
Upāsakaṁ
maṁ
bhagavā
dhāretu
ajjatagge
pāṇupetaṁ
saraṇaṁ
gatan”ti.
“Householder, you should act after careful consideration. It’s good for well-known people such as yourself to act after careful consideration.” “Now I’m even more delighted and satisfied with the Buddha, since he tells me to act after careful consideration. For if the followers of other religions were to gain me as a disciple, they’d carry a banner all over Nāḷandā, saying: ‘The householder Upāli has become our disciple!’ And yet the Buddha says: ‘Householder, you should act after careful consideration. It’s good for well-known people such as yourself to act after careful consideration.’ For a second time, I go for refuge to the Buddha, to the teaching, and to the mendicant Saṅgha. From this day forth, may the Buddha remember me as a lay follower who has gone for refuge for life.”
“Dīgharattaṁ
kho
te,
gahapati,
nigaṇṭhānaṁ
opānabhūtaṁ
kulaṁ
yena
nesaṁ
upagatānaṁ
piṇḍakaṁ
dātabbaṁ
maññeyyāsī”ti.
“Imināpāhaṁ,
bhante,
bhagavato
bhiyyoso
mattāya
attamano
abhiraddho
yaṁ
maṁ
bhagavā
evamāha:
‘dīgharattaṁ
kho
te,
gahapati,
nigaṇṭhānaṁ
opānabhūtaṁ
kulaṁ
yena
nesaṁ
upagatānaṁ
piṇḍakaṁ
dātabbaṁ
maññeyyāsī’ti.
Sutaṁ
metaṁ,
bhante,
samaṇo
gotamo
evamāha:
‘mayhameva
dānaṁ
dātabbaṁ,
nāññesaṁ
dānaṁ
dātabbaṁ;
mayhameva
sāvakānaṁ
dānaṁ
dātabbaṁ,
nāññesaṁ
sāvakānaṁ
dānaṁ
dātabbaṁ;
mayhameva
dinnaṁ
mahapphalaṁ,
nāññesaṁ
dinnaṁ
mahapphalaṁ;
mayhameva
sāvakānaṁ
dinnaṁ
mahapphalaṁ,
nāññesaṁ
sāvakānaṁ
dinnaṁ
mahapphalan’ti.
Atha
ca
pana
maṁ
bhagavā
nigaṇṭhesupi
dāne
samādapeti.
Api
ca,
bhante,
mayamettha
kālaṁ
jānissāma.
Esāhaṁ,
bhante,
tatiyampi
bhagavantaṁ
saraṇaṁ
gacchāmi
dhammañca
bhikkhusaṅghañca.
“For a long time now, householder, your family has been a well-spring of support for the Jain ascetics. You should consider giving to them when they come.” “Now I’m even more delighted and satisfied with the Buddha, since he tells me to consider giving to the Jain ascetics when they come. I have heard, sir, that the ascetic Gotama says this: ‘Gifts should only be given to me, not to others. Gifts should only be given to my disciples, not to the disciples of others. Only what is given to me is very fruitful, not what is given to others. Only what is given to my disciples is very fruitful, not what is given to the disciples of others.’ Yet the Buddha encourages me to give to the Jain ascetics. Well, sir, we’ll know the proper time for that. For a third time, I go for refuge to the Buddha, to the teaching, and to the mendicant Saṅgha.
‹ Previous · Page 4 of 7 · Next ›
Lite mode — plain HTML for e-readers and old browsers. Full version