Unblemished · Translation: Bhikkhu Sujato, SuttaCentral
Parallels & more translations on SuttaCentral
Evaṁ
me
sutaṁ—
ekaṁ
samayaṁ
bhagavā
sāvatthiyaṁ
viharati
jetavane
anāthapiṇḍikassa
ārāme.
Tatra
kho
āyasmā
sāriputto
bhikkhū
āmantesi:
“āvuso
bhikkhave”ti.
“Āvuso”ti
kho
te
bhikkhū
āyasmato
sāriputtassa
paccassosuṁ.
Āyasmā
sāriputto
etadavoca:
So I have heard. At one time the Buddha was staying near Sāvatthī in Jeta’s Grove, Anāthapiṇḍika’s monastery. There Sāriputta addressed the mendicants: “Reverends, mendicants!” “Reverend,” they replied. Sāriputta said this:
“Cattārome,
āvuso,
puggalā
santo
saṁvijjamānā
lokasmiṁ.
Katame
cattāro?
Idhāvuso,
ekacco
puggalo
sāṅgaṇova
samāno
‘atthi
me
ajjhattaṁ
aṅgaṇan’ti
yathābhūtaṁ
nappajānāti.
Idha
panāvuso,
ekacco
puggalo
sāṅgaṇova
samāno
‘atthi
me
ajjhattaṁ
aṅgaṇan’ti
yathābhūtaṁ
pajānāti.
Idhāvuso,
ekacco
puggalo
anaṅgaṇova
samāno
‘natthi
me
ajjhattaṁ
aṅgaṇan’ti
yathābhūtaṁ
nappajānāti.
Idha
panāvuso,
ekacco
puggalo
anaṅgaṇova
samāno
‘natthi
me
ajjhattaṁ
aṅgaṇan’ti
yathābhūtaṁ
pajānāti.
Tatrāvuso,
yvāyaṁ
puggalo
sāṅgaṇova
samāno
‘atthi
me
ajjhattaṁ
aṅgaṇan’ti
yathābhūtaṁ
nappajānāti,
ayaṁ
imesaṁ
dvinnaṁ
puggalānaṁ
sāṅgaṇānaṁyeva
sataṁ
hīnapuriso
akkhāyati.
Tatrāvuso,
yvāyaṁ
puggalo
sāṅgaṇova
samāno
‘atthi
me
ajjhattaṁ
aṅgaṇan’ti
yathābhūtaṁ
pajānāti,
ayaṁ
imesaṁ
dvinnaṁ
puggalānaṁ
sāṅgaṇānaṁyeva
sataṁ
seṭṭhapuriso
akkhāyati.
Tatrāvuso,
yvāyaṁ
puggalo
anaṅgaṇova
samāno
‘natthi
me
ajjhattaṁ
aṅgaṇan’ti
yathābhūtaṁ
nappajānāti,
ayaṁ
imesaṁ
dvinnaṁ
puggalānaṁ
anaṅgaṇānaṁyeva
sataṁ
hīnapuriso
akkhāyati.
Tatrāvuso,
yvāyaṁ
puggalo
anaṅgaṇova
samāno
‘natthi
me
ajjhattaṁ
aṅgaṇan’ti
yathābhūtaṁ
pajānāti,
ayaṁ
imesaṁ
dvinnaṁ
puggalānaṁ
anaṅgaṇānaṁyeva
sataṁ
seṭṭhapuriso
akkhāyatī”ti.
“Reverends, these four individuals are found in the world. What four? One individual with a blemish doesn’t truly understand: ‘There is a blemish in me.’ But another individual with a blemish does truly understand: ‘There is a blemish in me.’ One individual without a blemish doesn’t truly understand: ‘There is no blemish in me.’ But another individual without a blemish does truly understand: ‘There is no blemish in me.’ In this case, of the two individuals with a blemish, the one who doesn’t understand is said to be worse, while the one who does understand is better. And of the two individuals without a blemish, the one who doesn’t understand is said to be worse, while the one who does understand is better.”
Evaṁ
vutte,
āyasmā
mahāmoggallāno
āyasmantaṁ
sāriputtaṁ
etadavoca:
“Ko
nu
kho,
āvuso
sāriputta,
hetu
ko
paccayo
yenimesaṁ
dvinnaṁ
puggalānaṁ
sāṅgaṇānaṁyeva
sataṁ
eko
hīnapuriso
akkhāyati,
eko
seṭṭhapuriso
akkhāyati?
Ko
panāvuso
sāriputta,
hetu
ko
paccayo
yenimesaṁ
dvinnaṁ
puggalānaṁ
anaṅgaṇānaṁyeva
sataṁ
eko
hīnapuriso
akkhāyati,
eko
seṭṭhapuriso
akkhāyatī”ti?
When he said this, Venerable Mahāmoggallāna said to him: “What is the cause, Reverend Sāriputta, what is the reason why, of the two individuals with a blemish, one is said to be worse and one better? And what is the cause, what is the reason why, of the two individuals without a blemish, one is said to be worse and one better?”
“Tatrāvuso,
yvāyaṁ
puggalo
sāṅgaṇova
samāno
‘atthi
me
ajjhattaṁ
aṅgaṇan’ti
yathābhūtaṁ
nappajānāti,
tassetaṁ
pāṭikaṅkhaṁ—na
chandaṁ
janessati
na
vāyamissati
na
vīriyaṁ
ārabhissati
tassaṅgaṇassa
pahānāya;
so
sarāgo
sadoso
samoho
sāṅgaṇo
saṅkiliṭṭhacitto
kālaṁ
karissati.
Seyyathāpi,
āvuso,
kaṁsapāti
ābhatā
āpaṇā
vā
kammārakulā
vā
rajena
ca
malena
ca
pariyonaddhā.
Tamenaṁ
sāmikā
na
ceva
paribhuñjeyyuṁ
na
ca
pariyodapeyyuṁ,
rajāpathe
ca
naṁ
nikkhipeyyuṁ.
Evañhi
sā,
āvuso,
kaṁsapāti
aparena
samayena
saṅkiliṭṭhatarā
assa
malaggahitā”ti?
“Evamāvuso”ti.
“Evameva
kho,
āvuso,
yvāyaṁ
puggalo
sāṅgaṇova
samāno
‘atthi
me
ajjhattaṁ
aṅgaṇan’ti
yathābhūtaṁ
nappajānāti,
tassetaṁ
pāṭikaṅkhaṁ—na
chandaṁ
janessati
na
vāyamissati
na
vīriyaṁ
ārabhissati
tassaṅgaṇassa
pahānāya;
so
sarāgo
sadoso
samoho
sāṅgaṇo
saṅkiliṭṭhacitto
kālaṁ
karissati.
“Reverends, take the case of the individual who has a blemish and does not understand it. You can expect that they won’t generate enthusiasm, make an effort, or rouse up energy to give up that blemish. And they will die with greed, hate, and delusion, blemished, with a corrupted mind. Suppose a bronze cup was brought from a shop or smithy enveloped with dirt or stains. And the owners neither used it or had it cleaned, but kept it in a dirty place. Over time, wouldn’t that bronze cup get even dirtier and more stained?” “Yes, reverend.” “In the same way, take the case of the individual who has a blemish and does not understand it. You can expect that … they will die with a corrupted mind.
Tatrāvuso,
yvāyaṁ
puggalo
sāṅgaṇova
samāno
‘atthi
me
ajjhattaṁ
aṅgaṇan’ti
yathābhūtaṁ
pajānāti,
tassetaṁ
pāṭikaṅkhaṁ—chandaṁ
janessati
vāyamissati
vīriyaṁ
ārabhissati
tassaṅgaṇassa
pahānāya;
so
arāgo
adoso
amoho
anaṅgaṇo
asaṅkiliṭṭhacitto
kālaṁ
karissati.
Seyyathāpi,
āvuso,
kaṁsapāti
ābhatā
āpaṇā
vā
kammārakulā
vā
rajena
ca
malena
ca
pariyonaddhā.
Tamenaṁ
sāmikā
paribhuñjeyyuñceva
pariyodapeyyuñca,
na
ca
naṁ
rajāpathe
nikkhipeyyuṁ.
Evañhi
sā,
āvuso,
kaṁsapāti
aparena
samayena
parisuddhatarā
assa
pariyodātā”ti?
“Evamāvuso”ti.
“Evameva
kho,
āvuso,
yvāyaṁ
puggalo
sāṅgaṇova
samāno
‘atthi
me
ajjhattaṁ
aṅgaṇan’ti
yathābhūtaṁ
pajānāti,
tassetaṁ
pāṭikaṅkhaṁ—chandaṁ
janessati
vāyamissati
vīriyaṁ
ārabhissati
tassaṅgaṇassa
pahānāya;
so
arāgo
adoso
amoho
anaṅgaṇo
asaṅkiliṭṭhacitto
kālaṁ
karissati.
Take the case of the individual who has a blemish and does understand it. You can expect that they will generate enthusiasm, make an effort, and rouse up energy to give up that blemish. And they will die without greed, hate, and delusion, unblemished, with an uncorrupted mind. Suppose a bronze cup was brought from a shop or smithy enveloped with dirt or stains. But the owners used it and had it cleaned, and didn’t keep it in a dirty place. Over time, wouldn’t that bronze cup get cleaner and brighter?” “Yes, reverend.” “In the same way, take the case of the individual who has a blemish and does understand it. You can expect that … they will die with an uncorrupted mind.
Tatrāvuso,
yvāyaṁ
puggalo
anaṅgaṇova
samāno
‘natthi
me
ajjhattaṁ
aṅgaṇan’ti
yathābhūtaṁ
nappajānāti,
tassetaṁ
pāṭikaṅkhaṁ—subhanimittaṁ
manasi
karissati,
tassa
subhanimittassa
manasikārā
rāgo
cittaṁ
anuddhaṁsessati;
so
sarāgo
sadoso
samoho
sāṅgaṇo
saṅkiliṭṭhacitto
kālaṁ
karissati.
Seyyathāpi,
āvuso,
kaṁsapāti
ābhatā
āpaṇā
vā
kammārakulā
vā
parisuddhā
pariyodātā.
Tamenaṁ
sāmikā
na
ceva
paribhuñjeyyuṁ
na
ca
pariyodapeyyuṁ,
rajāpathe
ca
naṁ
nikkhipeyyuṁ.
Evañhi
sā,
āvuso,
kaṁsapāti
aparena
samayena
saṅkiliṭṭhatarā
assa
malaggahitā”ti?
“Evamāvuso”ti.
“Evameva
kho,
āvuso,
yvāyaṁ
puggalo
anaṅgaṇova
samāno
‘natthi
me
ajjhattaṁ
aṅgaṇan’ti
yathābhūtaṁ
nappajānāti,
tassetaṁ
pāṭikaṅkhaṁ—subhanimittaṁ
manasi
karissati,
tassa
subhanimittassa
manasikārā
rāgo
cittaṁ
anuddhaṁsessati;
so
sarāgo
sadoso
samoho
sāṅgaṇo
saṅkiliṭṭhacitto
kālaṁ
karissati.
Take the case of the individual who doesn’t have a blemish but does not understand it. You can expect that they will focus on the feature of beauty, and because of that, lust will infect their mind. And they will die with greed, hate, and delusion, blemished, with a corrupted mind. Suppose a bronze cup was brought from a shop or smithy clean and bright. And the owners neither used it or had it cleaned, but kept it in a dirty place. Over time, wouldn’t that bronze cup get dirtier and more stained?” “Yes, reverend.” “In the same way, take the case of the individual who has no blemish and does not understand it. You can expect that … they will die with a corrupted mind.
Page 1 of 5 · Next ›
Lite mode — plain HTML for e-readers and old browsers. Full version