The Shorter Discourse With Māluṅkya · Translation: Bhikkhu Sujato, SuttaCentral
Parallels & more translations on SuttaCentral
not‘na
existshoti
the Tathāgatatathāgato
afterparaṁ
deathmaraṇā’ti,
not‘na
existshoti
the Tathāgatatathāgato
afterparaṁ
deathmaraṇā’ti
to meme
the Blessed Onebhagavā
should declarebyākarotu.
ifNo
indeedce
the Blessed Onebhagavā
knowsjānāti:
exists‘hoti
the Tathāgatatathāgato
afterparaṁ
deathmaraṇā’ti
orvā,
not‘na
existshoti
the Tathāgatatathāgato
afterparaṁ
deathmaraṇā’ti
orvā,
one not knowingajānato
indeedkho
furtherpana
one not seeingapassato
this·veryetadeva
straightforwardujukaṁ
ishoti
that isyadidaṁ:
not‘na
I knowjānāmi
notna
I seepassāmī’ti.
ifSace
the Blessed Onebhagavā
knowsjānāti:
exists‘hoti
andca
notna
andca
existshoti
the Tathāgatatathāgato
afterparaṁ
deathmaraṇā’ti,
exists‘hoti
andca
notna
andca
existshoti
the Tathāgatatathāgato
afterparaṁ
deathmaraṇā’ti
to meme
the Blessed Onebhagavā
should declarebyākarotu;
ifsace
the Blessed Onebhagavā
knowsjānāti:
neither‘neva
existshoti
notna
notna
existshoti
the Tathāgatatathāgato
afterparaṁ
deathmaraṇā’ti,
neither‘neva
existshoti
notna
notna
existshoti
the Tathāgatatathāgato
afterparaṁ
deathmaraṇā’ti
to meme
the Blessed Onebhagavā
should declarebyākarotu.
ifNo
indeedce
the Blessed Onebhagavā
knowsjānāti:
or no longer exists, or both still exists and no longer exists, or neither still exists nor no longer exists, please tell me. If you don’t know
is‘hoti
andca
notna
andca
ishoti
the Tathāgatatathāgato
afterparaṁ
death + quotation markermaraṇā’ti
orvā,
is not‘neva
ishoti
notna
notna
ishoti
the Tathāgatatathāgato
afterparaṁ
death + quotation markermaraṇā’ti
orvā,
not·knowingajānato
indeedkho
furtherpana
not·seeingapassato
this·veryetadeva
straightforwardujukaṁ
ishoti
what + thisyadidaṁ:
not‘na
I knowjānāmi,
notna
see + quotation markerpassāmī’”ti.
any of these things, then it is straightforward to simply say: ‘I neither know nor see.’”
what“Kiṁ
indeednu
you·Itāhaṁ,
Māluṅkyaputtamālukyaputta,
thusevaṁ
I saidavacaṁ:
come‘ehi
youtvaṁ,
Māluṅkyaputtamālukyaputta,
under memayi
holy·lifebrahmacariyaṁ
leadcara,
Iahaṁ
to youte
out·makebyākarissāmi:
eternal“sassato
world + quotation markerloko”ti
orvā,
not eternal“asassato
world + quotation markerloko”ti
orvā,
finite“antavā
world + quotation markerloko”ti
orvā,
infinite“anantavā
world + quotation markerloko”ti
orvā,
that“taṁ
lifejīvaṁ
thattaṁ
body + quotation markersarīran”ti
orvā,
different“aññaṁ
lifejīvaṁ
differentaññaṁ
body + quotation markersarīran”ti
orvā,
exists“hoti
the Tathāgatatathāgato
afterparaṁ
death + quotation markermaraṇā”ti
orvā,
not“na
existshoti
the Tathāgatatathāgato
afterparaṁ
death + quotation markermaraṇā”ti
orvā,
exists“hoti
andca
notna
andca
does not existhoti
the Tathāgatatathāgato
afterparaṁ
death + quotation markermaraṇā”ti
orvā,
neither“neva
existshoti
notna
notna
does not existhoti
the Tathāgatatathāgato
afterparaṁ
death + quotation markermaraṇā”ti
orvā’”ti?
no“No
indeed thishetaṁ,
sirbhante”.
you“Tvaṁ
orvā
butpana
memaṁ
thusevaṁ
you saidavaca:
I‘ahaṁ,
sirbhante,
under the Buddhabhagavati
holy·lifebrahmacariyaṁ
I will leadcarissāmi,
the Buddhabhagavā
to meme
out·makebyākarissati:
“What, Māluṅkyaputta, did I ever say to you: ‘Come, Māluṅkyaputta, lead the spiritual life under me, and I will declare these things to you’?” “No, sir.” “Or did you ever say to me: ‘Sir, I will lead the spiritual life under the Buddha, and the Buddha will declare these things to me’?”
eternal“sassato
world + quotationloko”ti
orvā,
not·eternal“asassato
world + quotationloko”ti
orvā,
finite“antavā
world + quotationloko”ti
orvā,
not·finite“anantavā
world + quotationloko”ti
orvā,
that“taṁ
life force, samejīvaṁ
thattaṁ
body + quotationsarīran”ti
orvā,
one“aññaṁ
life force, differentjīvaṁ
oneaññaṁ
body + quotationsarīran”ti
orvā,
exists“hoti
the Tathāgatatathāgato
afterparaṁ
death + quotationmaraṇā”ti
orvā,
not“na
existshoti
the Tathāgatatathāgato
afterparaṁ
death + quotationmaraṇā”ti
orvā,
exists“hoti
andca
notna
andca
existshoti
the Tathāgatatathāgato
afterparaṁ
death + quotationmaraṇā”ti
orvā,
neither“neva
existshoti
notna
notna
existshoti
the Tathāgatatathāgato
afterparaṁ
death + quotationmaraṇā”ti
or + quotationvā’”ti?
no“No
certainly + thathetaṁ,
sirbhante”.
thus“Iti
indeedkira,
Māluṅkyaputtamālukyaputta,
nor did Inevāhaṁ
thattaṁ
I sayvadāmi:
come‘ehi
youtvaṁ,
Māluṅkyaputtamālukyaputta,
in memayi
the spiritual lifebrahmacariyaṁ
leadcara,
Iahaṁ
to youte
will declarebyākarissāmi:
eternal“sassato
world + quotationloko”ti
orvā,
not·eternal“asassato
world + quotationloko”ti
orvā
ellipsis…pe…
neither“neva
existshoti
notna
notna
existshoti
the Tathāgatatathāgato
afterparaṁ
death + quotationmaraṇāti
or, itvā”’ti;
nor indeednapi
indeedkira
memaṁ
youtvaṁ
you sayvadesi:
I‘ahaṁ,
sirbhante,
in the Blessed Onebhagavati
the spiritual lifebrahmacariyaṁ
will leadcarissāmi,
the Blessed Onebhagavā
to meme
will declarebyākarissati:
“No, sir.” “So it seems that I did not say to you: ‘Come, Māluṅkyaputta, lead the spiritual life under me, and I will declare these things to you.’ And you never said to me: ‘Sir, I will lead the spiritual life under the Buddha, and the Buddha will declare these things to me.’
"eternal"“sassato
world" thusloko”ti
orvā
"not eternal"“asassato
world" thusloko”ti
orvā
…pe……pe…
"neither“neva
ishoti
notna
notna
ishoti
thus·gonetathāgato
afterparaṁ
death" thusmaraṇā”ti
or" thus.vā’ti.
this being soEvaṁ
being,sante,
futile·manmoghapurisa,
whoko
beingsanto
whomkaṁ
do you disavow?paccācikkhasi?
In that case, you futile man, who are you and what do you disavow?
whoYo
indeedkho,
Māluṅkyaputtamālukyaputta,
thusevaṁ
would sayvadeyya:
not‘na
as long as Itāvāhaṁ
under the Buddhabhagavati
spiritual·lifebrahmacariyaṁ
I will leadcarissāmi
as long asyāva
to meme
the Buddhabhagavā
notna
will declarebyākarissati:
eternal“sassato
the cosmosloko”ti
orvā,
not eternal“asassato
the cosmosloko”ti
orvā
……pe…
neither“neva
existshoti
notna
notna
existshoti
thus·gonetathāgato
afterparaṁ
deathmaraṇā”ti
orvā’ti,
still remain undeclaredabyākatameva
thattaṁ,
Māluṅkyaputtamālukyaputta,
thus·gonetathāgatena
would beassa,
andatha
thatso
individualpuggalo
deathkālaṁ
would diekareyya.
supposeSeyyathāpi,
Māluṅkyaputtamālukyaputta,
a manpuriso
by an arrowsallena
struckviddho
would beassa
with·poisonsavisena
thickly smearedgāḷhapalepanena.
hisTassa
friends and colleaguesmittāmaccā
relative·kinñātisālohitā
a surgeonbhisakkaṁ
arrow·surgeonsallakattaṁ
would get to treatupaṭṭhapeyyuṁ.
heSo
thusevaṁ
would sayvadeyya:
not‘na
as long as Itāvāhaṁ
thisimaṁ
arrowsallaṁ
I will extractāharissāmi
as long asyāva
notna
thetaṁ
manpurisaṁ
I knowjānāmi
by whom I wasyenamhi
woundedviddho,
an aristocratkhattiyo
orvā
a brahminbrāhmaṇo
orvā
a peasantvesso
orvā
a menialsuddo
orvā’ti;
heso
thusevaṁ
would sayvadeyya:
not‘na
as long as Itāvāhaṁ
thisimaṁ
arrowsallaṁ
I will extractāharissāmi
as long asyāva
notna
thetaṁ
manpurisaṁ
I knowjānāmi
by whom I wasyenamhi
woundedviddho,
thus·nameevaṁnāmo
of such clanevaṅgotto
thusiti
orvā’ti;
heso
thusevaṁ
would sayvadeyya:
Suppose someone were to say this: ‘I will not lead the spiritual life under the Buddha until the Buddha declares to me that the cosmos is eternal, or that the cosmos is not eternal … or that after death a realized one neither still exists nor no longer exists.’ That would still remain undeclared by the Realized One, and meanwhile that individual would die. Suppose a man was struck by an arrow thickly smeared with poison. His friends and colleagues, relatives and kin would get a surgeon to treat him. But the man would say: ‘I won’t extract this arrow as long as I don’t know whether the man who wounded me was an aristocrat, a brahmin, a peasant, or a menial.’ He’d say: ‘I won’t extract this arrow as long as I don’t know the following things about the man who wounded me: his name and clan;
‹ Previous · Page 2 of 4 · Next ›
Lite mode — plain HTML for e-readers and old browsers. Full version