The Shorter Discourse With Māluṅkya · Translation: Bhikkhu Sujato, SuttaCentral
Parallels & more translations on SuttaCentral
‘na
hoti
tathāgato
paraṁ
maraṇā’ti,
‘na
hoti
tathāgato
paraṁ
maraṇā’ti
me
bhagavā
byākarotu.
No
ce
bhagavā
jānāti:
‘hoti
tathāgato
paraṁ
maraṇā’ti
vā,
‘na
hoti
tathāgato
paraṁ
maraṇā’ti
vā,
ajānato
kho
pana
apassato
etadeva
ujukaṁ
hoti
yadidaṁ:
‘na
jānāmi
na
passāmī’ti.
Sace
bhagavā
jānāti:
‘hoti
ca
na
ca
hoti
tathāgato
paraṁ
maraṇā’ti,
‘hoti
ca
na
ca
hoti
tathāgato
paraṁ
maraṇā’ti
me
bhagavā
byākarotu;
sace
bhagavā
jānāti:
‘neva
hoti
na
na
hoti
tathāgato
paraṁ
maraṇā’ti,
‘neva
hoti
na
na
hoti
tathāgato
paraṁ
maraṇā’ti
me
bhagavā
byākarotu.
No
ce
bhagavā
jānāti:
or no longer exists, or both still exists and no longer exists, or neither still exists nor no longer exists, please tell me. If you don’t know
‘hoti
ca
na
ca
hoti
tathāgato
paraṁ
maraṇā’ti
vā,
‘neva
hoti
na
na
hoti
tathāgato
paraṁ
maraṇā’ti
vā,
ajānato
kho
pana
apassato
etadeva
ujukaṁ
hoti
yadidaṁ:
‘na
jānāmi,
na
passāmī’”ti.
any of these things, then it is straightforward to simply say: ‘I neither know nor see.’”
“Kiṁ
nu
tāhaṁ,
mālukyaputta,
evaṁ
avacaṁ:
‘ehi
tvaṁ,
mālukyaputta,
mayi
brahmacariyaṁ
cara,
ahaṁ
te
byākarissāmi:
“sassato
loko”ti
vā,
“asassato
loko”ti
vā,
“antavā
loko”ti
vā,
“anantavā
loko”ti
vā,
“taṁ
jīvaṁ
taṁ
sarīran”ti
vā,
“aññaṁ
jīvaṁ
aññaṁ
sarīran”ti
vā,
“hoti
tathāgato
paraṁ
maraṇā”ti
vā,
“na
hoti
tathāgato
paraṁ
maraṇā”ti
vā,
“hoti
ca
na
ca
hoti
tathāgato
paraṁ
maraṇā”ti
vā,
“neva
hoti
na
na
hoti
tathāgato
paraṁ
maraṇā”ti
vā’”ti?
“No
hetaṁ,
bhante”.
“Tvaṁ
vā
pana
maṁ
evaṁ
avaca:
‘ahaṁ,
bhante,
bhagavati
brahmacariyaṁ
carissāmi,
bhagavā
me
byākarissati:
“What, Māluṅkyaputta, did I ever say to you: ‘Come, Māluṅkyaputta, lead the spiritual life under me, and I will declare these things to you’?” “No, sir.” “Or did you ever say to me: ‘Sir, I will lead the spiritual life under the Buddha, and the Buddha will declare these things to me’?”
“sassato
loko”ti
vā,
“asassato
loko”ti
vā,
“antavā
loko”ti
vā,
“anantavā
loko”ti
vā,
“taṁ
jīvaṁ
taṁ
sarīran”ti
vā,
“aññaṁ
jīvaṁ
aññaṁ
sarīran”ti
vā,
“hoti
tathāgato
paraṁ
maraṇā”ti
vā,
“na
hoti
tathāgato
paraṁ
maraṇā”ti
vā,
“hoti
ca
na
ca
hoti
tathāgato
paraṁ
maraṇā”ti
vā,
“neva
hoti
na
na
hoti
tathāgato
paraṁ
maraṇā”ti
vā’”ti?
“No
hetaṁ,
bhante”.
“Iti
kira,
mālukyaputta,
nevāhaṁ
taṁ
vadāmi:
‘ehi
tvaṁ,
mālukyaputta,
mayi
brahmacariyaṁ
cara,
ahaṁ
te
byākarissāmi:
“sassato
loko”ti
vā,
“asassato
loko”ti
vā
…pe…
“neva
hoti
na
na
hoti
tathāgato
paraṁ
maraṇāti
vā”’ti;
napi
kira
maṁ
tvaṁ
vadesi:
‘ahaṁ,
bhante,
bhagavati
brahmacariyaṁ
carissāmi,
bhagavā
me
byākarissati:
“No, sir.” “So it seems that I did not say to you: ‘Come, Māluṅkyaputta, lead the spiritual life under me, and I will declare these things to you.’ And you never said to me: ‘Sir, I will lead the spiritual life under the Buddha, and the Buddha will declare these things to me.’
“sassato
loko”ti
vā
“asassato
loko”ti
vā
…pe…
“neva
hoti
na
na
hoti
tathāgato
paraṁ
maraṇā”ti
vā’ti.
Evaṁ
sante,
moghapurisa,
ko
santo
kaṁ
paccācikkhasi?
In that case, you futile man, who are you and what do you disavow?
Yo
kho,
mālukyaputta,
evaṁ
vadeyya:
‘na
tāvāhaṁ
bhagavati
brahmacariyaṁ
carissāmi
yāva
me
bhagavā
na
byākarissati:
“sassato
loko”ti
vā,
“asassato
loko”ti
vā
…pe…
“neva
hoti
na
na
hoti
tathāgato
paraṁ
maraṇā”ti
vā’ti,
abyākatameva
taṁ,
mālukyaputta,
tathāgatena
assa,
atha
so
puggalo
kālaṁ
kareyya.
Seyyathāpi,
mālukyaputta,
puriso
sallena
viddho
assa
savisena
gāḷhapalepanena.
Tassa
mittāmaccā
ñātisālohitā
bhisakkaṁ
sallakattaṁ
upaṭṭhapeyyuṁ.
So
evaṁ
vadeyya:
‘na
tāvāhaṁ
imaṁ
sallaṁ
āharissāmi
yāva
na
taṁ
purisaṁ
jānāmi
yenamhi
viddho,
khattiyo
vā
brāhmaṇo
vā
vesso
vā
suddo
vā’ti;
so
evaṁ
vadeyya:
‘na
tāvāhaṁ
imaṁ
sallaṁ
āharissāmi
yāva
na
taṁ
purisaṁ
jānāmi
yenamhi
viddho,
evaṁnāmo
evaṅgotto
iti
vā’ti;
so
evaṁ
vadeyya:
Suppose someone were to say this: ‘I will not lead the spiritual life under the Buddha until the Buddha declares to me that the cosmos is eternal, or that the cosmos is not eternal … or that after death a realized one neither still exists nor no longer exists.’ That would still remain undeclared by the Realized One, and meanwhile that individual would die. Suppose a man was struck by an arrow thickly smeared with poison. His friends and colleagues, relatives and kin would get a surgeon to treat him. But the man would say: ‘I won’t extract this arrow as long as I don’t know whether the man who wounded me was an aristocrat, a brahmin, a peasant, or a menial.’ He’d say: ‘I won’t extract this arrow as long as I don’t know the following things about the man who wounded me: his name and clan;
‹ Previous · Page 2 of 4 · Next ›
Lite mode — plain HTML for e-readers and old browsers. Full version