The Simile of the Quail · Translation: Bhikkhu Sujato, SuttaCentral
Parallels & more translations on SuttaCentral
for themTesaṁ thattaṁ, Udāyiudāyi, ishoti weakabalaṁ bondbandhanaṁ, feebledubbalaṁ bondbandhanaṁ, rottenpūtikaṁ bondbandhanaṁ, insubstantialasārakaṁ bondbandhanaṁ.
For them, that bond is weak, feeble, rotten, and insubstantial.
fourCattārome,
Udāyīudāyi,
individualspuggalā
beingsanto
foundsaṁvijjamānā
in the worldlokasmiṁ.
whatKatame
fourcattāro?
Udāyī, these four individuals are found in the world. What four?
here, UdāyīIdhudāyi,
a certainekacco
individualpuggalo
for giving up attachmentsupadhipahānāya
practicingpaṭipanno
ishoti
for letting go of attachments.upadhipaṭinissaggāya.
that oneTamenaṁ
practicing to give up attachmentsupadhipahānāya
practicingpaṭipannaṁ
for letting go of attachmentsupadhipaṭinissaggāya
connected with attachmentsupadhipaṭisaṁyuttā
memories and thoughtssarasaṅkappā
besetsamudācaranti.
theySo
themte
tolerateadhivāseti,
do not give upnappajahati,
notna
dispelvinodeti,
notna
eliminatebyantīkaroti,
notna
obliterationanabhāvaṁ
obliterategameti.
thisImaṁ
indeedkho
Iahaṁ,
Udāyīudāyi,
individualpuggalaṁ
‘fettered’‘saṁyutto’ti
I callvadāmi
notno
‘detached’.‘visaṁyutto’.
thatTaṁ
of whatkissa
reason?hetu?
disparity of facultiesIndriyavemattatā
becausehi
by meme,
Udāyīudāyi,
in thisimasmiṁ
individualpuggale
understoodviditā.
Take a certain individual practicing to give up and let go of attachments. As they do so, memories and thoughts connected with attachments beset them. They tolerate them and don’t give them up, dispel them, eliminate them, and obliterate them. I call this individual ‘fettered’, not ‘detached’. Why is that? Because I understand the disparity of faculties as it applies to this individual.
hereIdha
but Udāyīpanudāyi,
a certainekacco
personpuggalo
for giving up attachmentsupadhipahānāya
practicingpaṭipanno
ishoti
for letting go of attachmentsupadhipaṭinissaggāya.
that personTamenaṁ
for giving up attachmentsupadhipahānāya
practicingpaṭipannaṁ
for letting go of attachmentsupadhipaṭinissaggāya
connected with attachmentsupadhipaṭisaṁyuttā
memories and thoughtssarasaṅkappā
besetsamudācaranti.
heSo
themte
doesn't toleratenādhivāseti,
gives uppajahati,
dispelsvinodeti,
eliminatesbyantīkaroti,
to non-existenceanabhāvaṁ
obliteratesgameti.
this personImampi
indeedkho
Iahaṁ,
Udāyīudāyi,
personpuggalaṁ
‘fettered’‘saṁyutto’ti
I sayvadāmi
notno
‘detached’‘visaṁyutto’.
thatTaṁ
of whatkissa
the reasonhetu?
disparity of facultiesIndriyavemattatā
becausehi
by meme,
Udāyīudāyi,
in thisimasmiṁ
personpuggale
understoodviditā.
Take another individual practicing to give up and let go of attachments. As they do so, memories and thoughts connected with attachments beset them. They don’t tolerate them, but give them up, dispel them, eliminate them, and obliterate them. I also call this individual ‘fettered’, not ‘detached’. Why is that? Because I understand the disparity of faculties as it applies to this individual.
hereIdha
then, Udāyinpanudāyi,
someekacco
personpuggalo
for the abandoning of attachmentsupadhipahānāya
practicingpaṭipanno
ishoti
for the letting go of attachmentsupadhipaṭinissaggāya.
himTamenaṁ
for the abandoning of attachmentsupadhipahānāya
practicingpaṭipannaṁ
for the letting go of attachmentsupadhipaṭinissaggāya
sometimeskadāci
occasionallykarahaci
due to the loss of mindfulnesssatisammosā
connected with attachmentsupadhipaṭisaṁyuttā
thoughts and memoriessarasaṅkappā
besetsamudācaranti;
slowdandho,
Udāyinudāyi,
the arising of mindfulnesssatuppādo.
thenAtha
indeedkho
thosenaṁ
quicklykhippameva
gives uppajahati,
dispelsvinodeti,
eliminatesbyantīkaroti,
to non-existenceanabhāvaṁ
makes gogameti.
just asSeyyathāpi,
Udāyinudāyi,
a manpuriso
heated all daydivasaṁsantatte
iron cauldronayokaṭāhe
twodve
orvā
threetīṇi
orvā
drops of waterudakaphusitāni
would let fallnipāteyya;
slowdandho,
Udāyinudāyi,
of the water dropsudakaphusitānaṁ
the fallingnipāto.
thenAtha
indeedkho
theynaṁ
quicklykhippameva
destructionparikkhayaṁ
evaporationpariyādānaṁ
would go togaccheyya.
just soEvameva
indeedkho,
Udāyinudāyi,
here someidhekacco
personpuggalo
for the abandoning of attachmentsupadhipahānāya
practicingpaṭipanno
ishoti
for the letting go of attachmentsupadhipaṭinissaggāya.
himTamenaṁ
for the abandoning of attachmentsupadhipahānāya
practicingpaṭipannaṁ
for the letting go of attachmentsupadhipaṭinissaggāya
sometimeskadāci
occasionallykarahaci
due to the loss of mindfulnesssatisammosā
connected with attachmentsupadhipaṭisaṁyuttā
thoughts and memoriessarasaṅkappā
besetsamudācaranti;
slowdandho,
Udāyinudāyi,
the arising of mindfulnesssatuppādo.
thenAtha
indeedkho
thosenaṁ
quicklykhippameva
gives uppajahati,
dispelsvinodeti,
eliminatesbyantīkaroti,
to non-existenceanabhāvaṁ
makes gogameti.
this tooImampi
indeedkho
Iahaṁ,
Udāyinudāyi,
personpuggalaṁ
fettered‘saṁyutto’ti
callvadāmi
notno
detached‘visaṁyutto’.
thatTaṁ
of whatkissa
is the causehetu?
Take another individual practicing to give up and let go of attachments. As they do so, memories and thoughts connected with attachments beset them every so often, due to the loss of mindfulness. Slowly mindfulness arises, then they quickly give up, dispel, eliminate, and obliterate those thoughts. Suppose there was an iron cauldron that had been heated all day, and a person let two or three drops of water fall onto it. Slowly the drops fall, but then they quickly dry up and evaporate. In the same way, take an individual practicing to give up and let go of attachments. As they do so, memories and thoughts connected with attachments beset them every so often, due to the loss of mindfulness. Slowly mindfulness arises, but then they quickly give up, dispel, eliminate, and obliterate those thoughts. I also call this individual ‘fettered’, not ‘detached’. Why is that?
disparity of facultiesIndriyavemattatā becausehi by meme, Udāyiudāyi, in thisimasmiṁ individualpuggale understoodviditā.
Because I understand the disparity of faculties as it applies to this individual.
hereIdha
and Udayipanudāyi,
a certainekacco
individualpuggalo
attachment‘upadhi
of sufferingdukkhassa
is the rootmūlan’ti—
thusiti
having understoodviditvā
free from attachmentnirupadhi
ishoti,
in the ending of attachmentsupadhisaṅkhaye
is freedvimutto.
thisImaṁ
indeedkho
Iahaṁ,
Udayiudāyi,
individualpuggalaṁ
detached‘visaṁyutto’ti
I callvadāmi
notno
fettered‘saṁyutto’ti.
thatTaṁ
of whatkissa
causehetu?
disparity of facultiesIndriyavemattatā
becausehi
by meme,
Udayiudāyi,
in thisimasmiṁ
individualpuggale
is understoodviditā.
theseIme
indeedkho,
Udayiudāyi,
fourcattāro
individualspuggalā
beingsanto
foundsaṁvijjamānā
in the worldlokasmiṁ.
Take another individual who, understanding that attachment is the root of suffering, is freed with the ending of attachments. I call this individual ‘detached’, not ‘fettered’. Why is that? Because I understand the disparity of faculties as it applies to this individual. These are the four individuals found in the world.
fivePañca
indeedkho
theseime,
Udāyīudāyi,
sensual stimulationskāmaguṇā.
whichKatame
five?pañca?
knowable by the eyeCakkhuviññeyyā
sightsrūpā
likableiṭṭhā
desirablekantā
agreeablemanāpā
pleasantpiyarūpā
sensualkāmūpasaṁhitā
arousingrajanīyā,
knowable by the earsotaviññeyyā
soundssaddā
…pe……pe…
knowable by the noseghānaviññeyyā
smellsgandhā
……
knowable by the tonguejivhāviññeyyā
tastesrasā
……
knowable by the bodykāyaviññeyyā
touchesphoṭṭhabbā
likableiṭṭhā
desirablekantā
agreeablemanāpā
pleasantpiyarūpā
sensualkāmūpasaṁhitā
arousingrajanīyā.
theseIme
indeedkho,
Udāyīudāyi,
fivepañca
sensual stimulationskāmaguṇā.
Udāyī, these are the five kinds of sensual stimulation. What five? Sights known by the eye, which are likable, desirable, agreeable, pleasant, sensual, and arousing. Sounds known by the ear … Smells known by the nose … Tastes known by the tongue … Touches known by the body, which are likable, desirable, agreeable, pleasant, sensual, and arousing. These are the five kinds of sensual stimulation.
whichYaṁ indeedkho, Udāyiudāyi, theseime fivepañca kinds of sensual stimulationkāmaguṇe because ofpaṭicca arisesuppajjati pleasuresukhaṁ happinesssomanassaṁ thisidaṁ is calledvuccati sensual pleasurekāmasukhaṁ filthy pleasuremiḷhasukhaṁ ordinary pleasureputhujjanasukhaṁ ignoble pleasureanariyasukhaṁ, notna should be cultivatedsevitabbaṁ, notna should be developedbhāvetabbaṁ, notna should be practicedbahulīkātabbaṁ; should be feared‘bhāyitabbaṁ of thisetassa pleasuresukhassā’ti I sayvadāmi.
The pleasure and happiness that arise from these five kinds of sensual stimulation is called sensual pleasure—a filthy, ordinary, ignoble pleasure. Such pleasure should not be cultivated or developed, but should be feared, I say.
here, UdāyiIdhudāyi,
a mendicantbhikkhu
quite secludedvivicceva
from sensual pleasureskāmehi
…pe……pe…
firstpaṭhamaṁ
absorptionjhānaṁ
enters and remainsupasampajja
remainsviharati
of thinking and consideringvitakkavicārānaṁ
from the stillingvūpasamā
…pe……pe…
seconddutiyaṁ
absorptionjhānaṁ
enters and remainsupasampajja
remains,viharati,
of joypītiyā
andca
from fading awayvirāgā
…pe……pe…
thirdtatiyaṁ
absorptionjhānaṁ
enters and remainsupasampajja
remains,viharati,
of pleasuresukhassa
andca
from giving uppahānā
…pe……pe…
fourthcatutthaṁ
absorptionjhānaṁ
enters and remainsupasampajja
remains.viharati.
Take a mendicant who, quite secluded from sensual pleasures, secluded from unskillful qualities, enters and remains in the first absorption … second absorption … third absorption … fourth absorption.
thisIdaṁ is calledvuccati pleasure of renunciationnekkhammasukhaṁ pleasure of seclusionpavivekasukhaṁ pleasure of peaceupasamasukhaṁ pleasure of awakeningsambodhasukhaṁ, should be cultivatedāsevitabbaṁ, should be developedbhāvetabbaṁ, should be practiced frequentlybahulīkātabbaṁ; not‘na should be fearedbhāyitabbaṁ of thisetassa pleasuresukhassā’ti I sayvadāmi.
This is called the pleasure of renunciation, the pleasure of seclusion, the pleasure of peace, the pleasure of awakening. Such pleasure should be cultivated and developed, and should not be feared, I say.
here, Udāyi,Idhudāyi,
a mendicantbhikkhu
quite secludedvivicceva
from sensual pleasureskāmehi
…pe……pe…
firstpaṭhamaṁ
absorptionjhānaṁ
having enteredupasampajja
remains;viharati;
thisidaṁ
indeedkho
Iahaṁ,
Udāyi,udāyi,
to the perturbableiñjitasmiṁ
I say.vadāmi.
And whatKiñca
theretattha
to the perturbable?iñjitasmiṁ?
WhateverYadeva
theretattha
placing of the mind and keeping it connectedvitakkavicārā
has not ceasedaniruddhā
arehonti
thisidaṁ
theretattha
to the perturbable.iñjitasmiṁ.
Take a mendicant who, quite secluded from sensual pleasures, secluded from unskillful qualities, enters and remains in the first absorption. This belongs to the perturbable, I say. And what there belongs to the perturbable? Whatever placing of the mind and keeping it connected has not ceased there is what belongs to the perturbable.
here, Udāyi,Idhudāyi,
a mendicantbhikkhu
of placing the mind and keeping it connectedvitakkavicārānaṁ
by the stillingvūpasamā
…pe……pe…
seconddutiyaṁ
absorptionjhānaṁ
having enteredupasampajja
dwells;viharati;
this tooidampi
indeedkho
Iahaṁ,
Udāyi,udāyi,
in the perturbableiñjitasmiṁ
I say.vadāmi.
And whatKiñca
theretattha
in the perturbable?iñjitasmiṁ?
whateverYadeva
theretattha
rapture and blisspītisukhaṁ
not ceasedaniruddhaṁ
ishoti
thisidaṁ
theretattha
in the perturbable.iñjitasmiṁ.
Take a mendicant who, as the placing of the mind and keeping it connected are stilled, enters and remains in the second absorption. This belongs to the perturbable, I say. And what there belongs to the perturbable? Whatever rapture and bliss has not ceased there is what belongs to the perturbable.
‹ Previous · Page 4 of 5 · Next ›
Lite mode — plain HTML for e-readers and old browsers. Full version