The Shorter Discourse With Sakuludāyī · Translation: Bhikkhu Sujato, SuttaCentral
Parallels & more translations on SuttaCentral
Api
ca,
udāyi,
tiṭṭhatu
pubbanto,
tiṭṭhatu
aparanto.
Dhammaṁ
te
desessāmi—
imasmiṁ
sati
idaṁ
hoti,
imassuppādā
idaṁ
uppajjati;
imasmiṁ
asati
idaṁ
na
hoti,
imassa
nirodhā
idaṁ
nirujjhatī”ti.
Nevertheless, Udāyī, leave aside the first beginning and the final end. I shall teach you the Dhamma: ‘When this exists, this comes to be; due to the arising of this, this arises. When this doesn’t exist, that is not; due to the cessation of this, that ceases.’”
“Ahañhi,
bhante,
yāvatakampi
me
iminā
attabhāvena
paccanubhūtaṁ
tampi
nappahomi
sākāraṁ
sauddesaṁ
anussarituṁ,
kuto
panāhaṁ
anekavihitaṁ
pubbenivāsaṁ
anussarissāmi,
seyyathidaṁ—ekampi
jātiṁ
dvepi
jātiyo
…pe…
iti
sākāraṁ
sauddesaṁ
anekavihitaṁ
pubbenivāsaṁ
anussarissāmi,
seyyathāpi
bhagavā?
Ahañhi,
bhante,
etarahi
paṁsupisācakampi
na
passāmi,
kuto
panāhaṁ
dibbena
cakkhunā
visuddhena
atikkantamānusakena
satte
passissāmi
cavamāne
upapajjamāne
hīne
paṇīte
suvaṇṇe
dubbaṇṇe
sugate
duggate
yathākammūpage
satte
pajānissāmi,
seyyathāpi
bhagavā?
Yaṁ
pana
maṁ,
bhante,
bhagavā
evamāha:
‘api
ca,
udāyi,
tiṭṭhatu
pubbanto,
tiṭṭhatu
aparanto;
dhammaṁ
te
desessāmi—
imasmiṁ
sati
idaṁ
hoti,
imassuppādā
idaṁ
uppajjati;
imasmiṁ
asati
idaṁ
na
hoti,
imassa
nirodhā
idaṁ
nirujjhatī’ti
tañca
pana
me
bhiyyoso
mattāya
na
pakkhāyati.
“Well sir, I can’t even recall with features and details what I’ve undergone in this incarnation. How should I possibly recollect my many kinds of past lives with features and details, like the Buddha? For I can’t even see a mud-goblin right now. How should I possibly, with clairvoyance that is purified and superhuman, see sentient beings passing away and being reborn, like the Buddha? But then the Buddha told me, ‘Nevertheless, Udāyī, leave aside the first beginning and the final end. I shall teach you the Dhamma: “When this exists, this comes to be; due to the arising of this, this arises. When this doesn’t exist, this doesn’t come to be; due to the cessation of this, this ceases.”’ But that is even more unclear to me.
Appeva nāmāhaṁ, bhante, sake ācariyake bhagavato cittaṁ ārādheyyaṁ pañhassa veyyākaraṇenā”ti.
Perhaps I might satisfy the Buddha by answering a question about my own denomination.”
“Kinti
pana
te,
udāyi,
sake
ācariyake
hotī”ti?
“Amhākaṁ,
bhante,
sake
ācariyake
evaṁ
hoti:
‘ayaṁ
paramo
vaṇṇo,
ayaṁ
paramo
vaṇṇo’”ti.
“Yaṁ
pana
te
etaṁ,
udāyi,
sake
ācariyake
evaṁ
hoti:
‘ayaṁ
paramo
vaṇṇo,
ayaṁ
paramo
vaṇṇo’ti,
katamo
so
paramo
vaṇṇo”ti?
“Yasmā,
bhante,
vaṇṇā
añño
vaṇṇo
uttaritaro
vā
paṇītataro
vā
natthi
so
paramo
vaṇṇo”ti.
“Katamo
pana
so
paramo
vaṇṇo
yasmā
vaṇṇā
añño
vaṇṇo
uttaritaro
vā
paṇītataro
vā
natthī”ti?
“Yasmā,
bhante,
vaṇṇā
añño
vaṇṇo
uttaritaro
vā
paṇītataro
vā
natthi
so
paramo
vaṇṇo”ti.
“But Udāyī, what is your own denomination?” “Sir, it’s this: ‘This is the ultimate splendor, this is the ultimate splendor.’” “But what is that ultimate splendor?” “Sir, the ultimate splendor is the splendor compared to which no other splendor is finer.” “But what is that ultimate splendor compared to which no other splendor is finer?” “Sir, the ultimate splendor is the splendor compared to which no other splendor is finer.”
“Dīghāpi
kho
te
esā,
udāyi,
phareyya:
‘yasmā,
bhante,
vaṇṇā
añño
vaṇṇo
uttaritaro
vā
paṇītataro
vā
natthi
so
paramo
vaṇṇo’ti
vadesi,
tañca
vaṇṇaṁ
na
paññapesi.
Seyyathāpi,
udāyi,
puriso
evaṁ
vadeyya:
‘ahaṁ
yā
imasmiṁ
janapade
janapadakalyāṇī
taṁ
icchāmi,
taṁ
kāmemī’ti.
Tamenaṁ
evaṁ
vadeyyuṁ:
‘ambho
purisa,
yaṁ
tvaṁ
janapadakalyāṇiṁ
icchasi
kāmesi,
jānāsi
taṁ
janapadakalyāṇiṁ—khattiyī
vā
brāhmaṇī
vā
vessī
vā
suddī
vā’ti?
Iti
puṭṭho
‘no’ti
vadeyya.
Tamenaṁ
evaṁ
vadeyyuṁ:
‘ambho
purisa,
yaṁ
tvaṁ
janapadakalyāṇiṁ
icchasi
kāmesi,
jānāsi
taṁ
janapadakalyāṇiṁ—evaṁnāmā
evaṅgottāti
vāti
…pe…
dīghā
vā
rassā
vā
majjhimā
vā
kāḷī
vā
sāmā
vā
maṅguracchavī
vāti
…
amukasmiṁ
gāme
vā
nigame
vā
nagare
vā’ti?
“Udāyī, you could draw this out for a long time. You say, ‘The ultimate splendor is the splendor compared to which no other splendor is finer.’ But you don’t describe that splendor. Suppose a man was to say, ‘Whoever the finest lady in the land is, it is her that I want, her I desire!’ They’d say to him, ‘My man, that finest lady in the land who you desire—do you know whether she’s an aristocrat, a brahmin, a peasant, or a menial?’ Asked this, he’d say, ‘No.’ They’d say to him, ‘My friend, that finest lady in the land who you desire—do you know her name or clan? Whether she’s tall or short or medium? Whether her skin is black, brown, or dingy? Whether she comes from such-and-such village, town, or city?’
Iti
puṭṭho
‘no’ti
vadeyya.
Tamenaṁ
evaṁ
vadeyyuṁ:
‘ambho
purisa,
yaṁ
tvaṁ
na
jānāsi
na
passasi,
taṁ
tvaṁ
icchasi
kāmesī’ti?
Iti
puṭṭho
‘āmā’ti
vadeyya.
Taṁ
kiṁ
maññasi,
udāyi—
nanu
evaṁ
sante,
tassa
purisassa
appāṭihīrakataṁ
bhāsitaṁ
sampajjatī”ti?
“Addhā
kho,
bhante,
evaṁ
sante
tassa
purisassa
appāṭihīrakataṁ
bhāsitaṁ
sampajjatī”ti.
“Evameva
kho
tvaṁ,
udāyi,
‘yasmā,
bhante,
vaṇṇā
añño
vaṇṇo
uttaritaro
vā
paṇītataro
vā
natthi
so
paramo
vaṇṇo’ti
vadesi,
tañca
vaṇṇaṁ
na
paññapesī”ti.
Asked this, he’d say, ‘No.’ They’d say to him, ‘My man, do you desire someone who you’ve never even known or seen?’ Asked this, he’d say, ‘Yes.’ What do you think, Udāyī? This being so, doesn’t that man’s statement turn out to have no demonstrable basis?” “Clearly that’s the case, sir.” “In the same way, you say, ‘The ultimate splendor is the splendor compared to which no other splendor is finer.’ But you don’t describe that splendor.”
“Seyyathāpi, bhante, maṇi veḷuriyo subho jātimā aṭṭhaṁso suparikammakato paṇḍukambale nikkhitto bhāsate ca tapate ca virocati ca, evaṁ vaṇṇo attā hoti arogo paraṁ maraṇā”ti.
“Worthy sir, suppose there was a beryl gem that was naturally lustrous, eight-faceted, well-worked. When placed on a cream rug it would shine and glow and dazzle. Such is the splendor of the self that is free of disease after death.”
“Taṁ
kiṁ
maññasi,
udāyi,
yo
vā
maṇi
veḷuriyo
subho
jātimā
aṭṭhaṁso
suparikammakato
paṇḍukambale
nikkhitto
bhāsate
ca
tapate
ca
virocati
ca,
yo
vā
rattandhakāratimisāya
kimi
khajjopanako—imesaṁ
ubhinnaṁ
vaṇṇānaṁ
katamo
vaṇṇo
abhikkantataro
ca
paṇītataro
cā”ti?
“Yvāyaṁ,
bhante,
rattandhakāratimisāya
kimi
khajjopanako—ayaṁ
imesaṁ
ubhinnaṁ
vaṇṇānaṁ
abhikkantataro
ca
paṇītataro
cā”ti.
“What do you think, Udāyī? Which of these two has a finer splendor: such a beryl gem, or a firefly in the dark of night?” “A firefly in the dark of night, sir.”
‹ Previous · Page 2 of 5 · Next ›
Lite mode — plain HTML for e-readers and old browsers. Full version