With Assalāyana · Translation: Bhikkhu Sujato, SuttaCentral
Parallels & more translations on SuttaCentral
“Kiñcāpi
bhavaṁ
gotamo
evamāha,
atha
khvettha
brāhmaṇā
evametaṁ
maññanti:
‘brāhmaṇova
seṭṭho
vaṇṇo,
hīno
añño
vaṇṇo
…pe…
brahmadāyādā’”ti.
“Taṁ
kiṁ
maññasi,
assalāyana,
brāhmaṇova
nu
kho
pahoti
sottisināniṁ
ādāya
nadiṁ
gantvā
rajojallaṁ
pavāhetuṁ,
no
khattiyo,
no
vesso,
no
suddo”ti?
“No
hidaṁ,
bho
gotama.
Khattiyopi
hi,
bho
gotama,
pahoti
sottisināniṁ
ādāya
nadiṁ
gantvā
rajojallaṁ
pavāhetuṁ,
brāhmaṇopi
hi,
bho
gotama
…
vessopi
hi,
bho
gotama
…
suddopi
hi,
bho
gotama
…
sabbepi
hi,
bho
gotama,
cattāro
vaṇṇā
pahonti
sottisināniṁ
ādāya
nadiṁ
gantvā
rajojallaṁ
pavāhetun”ti.
“Ettha,
assalāyana,
brāhmaṇānaṁ
kiṁ
balaṁ,
ko
assāso
yadettha
brāhmaṇā
evamāhaṁsu:
‘brāhmaṇova
seṭṭho
vaṇṇo,
hīno
añño
vaṇṇo
…pe…
brahmadāyādā’”ti?
“Even though you say this, still the brahmins maintain their belief.” “What do you think, Assalāyana? Is only a brahmin capable of taking some bathing cleanser, going to the river, and rinsing off dust and dirt, and not an aristocrat, peasant, or menial?” “No, worthy Gotama. All four classes are capable of doing this.” “Then what is the source of the brahmins’ certainty and forcefulness in this matter that they make this claim?”
“Kiñcāpi
bhavaṁ
gotamo
evamāha,
atha
khvettha
brāhmaṇā
evametaṁ
maññanti:
‘brāhmaṇova
seṭṭho
vaṇṇo,
hīno
añño
vaṇṇo
…pe…
brahmadāyādā’”ti.
“Taṁ
kiṁ
maññasi,
assalāyana,
idha
rājā
khattiyo
muddhāvasitto
nānājaccānaṁ
purisānaṁ
purisasataṁ
sannipāteyya:
‘āyantu
bhonto
ye
tattha
khattiyakulā
brāhmaṇakulā
rājaññakulā
uppannā,
sākassa
vā
sālassa
vā
salaḷassa
vā
candanassa
vā
padumakassa
vā
uttarāraṇiṁ
ādāya,
aggiṁ
abhinibbattentu,
tejo
pātukarontu.
Āyantu
pana
bhonto
ye
tattha
caṇḍālakulā
nesādakulā
venakulā
rathakārakulā
pukkusakulā
uppannā,
sāpānadoṇiyā
vā
sūkaradoṇiyā
vā
rajakadoṇiyā
vā
eraṇḍakaṭṭhassa
vā
uttarāraṇiṁ
ādāya,
aggiṁ
abhinibbattentu,
tejo
pātukarontū’ti.
Taṁ
kiṁ
maññasi,
assalāyana,
“Even though you say this, still the brahmins maintain their belief.” “What do you think, Assalāyana? Suppose an anointed aristocratic king were to gather a hundred people of various births and say to them: ‘Please worthy sirs, let anyone here who was born in a family of aristocrats, brahmins, or chieftains take a drill-stick made of teak, sal, salaḷa, sandalwood, or cherry wood, light a fire and produce heat. And let anyone here who was born in a family of corpse-workers, hunters, bamboo-workers, chariot-makers, or scavengers take a drill-stick made from a mutt’s drinking trough, a pig’s trough, a dustbin, or castor-oil wood, light a fire and produce heat.’ What do you think, Assalāyana?
yo
evaṁ
nu
kho
so
khattiyakulā
brāhmaṇakulā
rājaññakulā
uppannehi
sākassa
vā
sālassa
vā
salaḷassa
vā
candanassa
vā
padumakassa
vā
uttarāraṇiṁ
ādāya
aggi
abhinibbatto,
tejo
pātukato,
so
eva
nu
khvāssa
aggi
accimā
ceva
vaṇṇavā
ca
pabhassaro
ca,
tena
ca
sakkā
agginā
aggikaraṇīyaṁ
kātuṁ;
yo
pana
so
caṇḍālakulā
nesādakulā
venakulā
rathakārakulā
pukkusakulā
uppannehi
sāpānadoṇiyā
vā
sūkaradoṇiyā
vā
rajakadoṇiyā
vā
eraṇḍakaṭṭhassa
vā
uttarāraṇiṁ
ādāya
aggi
abhinibbatto,
tejo
pātukato
svāssa
aggi
na
ceva
accimā
na
ca
vaṇṇavā
na
ca
pabhassaro,
na
ca
tena
sakkā
agginā
aggikaraṇīyaṁ
kātun”ti?
“No
hidaṁ,
bho
gotama.
Would only the fire produced by the high class people with good quality wood have flames, color, and radiance, and be usable as fire, and not the fire produced by the low class people with poor quality wood?” “No, worthy Gotama.
Yopi
hi
so,
bho
gotama,
khattiyakulā
brāhmaṇakulā
rājaññakulā
uppannehi
sākassa
vā
sālassa
vā
salaḷassa
vā
candanassa
vā
padumakassa
vā
uttarāraṇiṁ
ādāya
aggi
abhinibbatto,
tejo
pātukato
svāssa
aggi
accimā
ceva
vaṇṇavā
ca
pabhassaro
ca,
tena
ca
sakkā
agginā
aggikaraṇīyaṁ
kātuṁ;
yopi
so
caṇḍālakulā
nesādakulā
venakulā
rathakārakulā
pukkusakulā
uppannehi
sāpānadoṇiyā
vā
sūkaradoṇiyā
vā
rajakadoṇiyā
vā
eraṇḍakaṭṭhassa
vā
uttarāraṇiṁ
ādāya
aggi
abhinibbatto,
tejo
pātukato,
svāssa
aggi
accimā
ceva
vaṇṇavā
ca
pabhassaro
ca,
tena
ca
sakkā
agginā
aggikaraṇīyaṁ
kātuṁ.
Sabbopi
hi,
bho
gotama,
aggi
accimā
ceva
vaṇṇavā
ca
pabhassaro
ca,
sabbenapi
sakkā
agginā
aggikaraṇīyaṁ
kātun”ti.
The fire produced by the high class people with good quality wood would have flames, color, and radiance, and be usable as fire, and so would the fire produced by the low class people with poor quality wood. For all fire has flames, color, and radiance, and is usable as fire.”
“Ettha,
assalāyana,
brāhmaṇānaṁ
kiṁ
balaṁ,
ko
assāso
yadettha
brāhmaṇā
evamāhaṁsu:
‘brāhmaṇova
seṭṭho
vaṇṇo,
hīno
añño
vaṇṇo;
brāhmaṇova
sukko
vaṇṇo,
kaṇho
añño
vaṇṇo;
brāhmaṇāva
sujjhanti,
no
abrāhmaṇā;
brāhmaṇāva
brahmuno
puttā
orasā
mukhato
jātā
brahmajā
brahmanimmitā
brahmadāyādā’”ti?
“Then what is the source of the brahmins’ certainty and forcefulness in this matter that they make this claim?”
“Kiñcāpi
bhavaṁ
gotamo
evamāha,
atha
khvettha
brāhmaṇā
evametaṁ
maññanti:
‘brāhmaṇova
seṭṭho
vaṇṇo,
hīno
añño
vaṇṇo
…pe…
brahmadāyādā’”ti.
“Taṁ
kiṁ
maññasi,
assalāyana,
idha
khattiyakumāro
brāhmaṇakaññāya
saddhiṁ
saṁvāsaṁ
kappeyya,
tesaṁ
saṁvāsamanvāya
putto
jāyetha;
yo
so
khattiyakumārena
brāhmaṇakaññāya
putto
uppanno,
siyā
so
mātupi
sadiso
pitupi
sadiso,
‘khattiyo’tipi
vattabbo
‘brāhmaṇo’tipi
vattabbo”ti?
“Yo
so,
bho
gotama,
khattiyakumārena
brāhmaṇakaññāya
putto
uppanno,
siyā
so
mātupi
sadiso
pitupi
sadiso,
‘khattiyo’tipi
vattabbo
‘brāhmaṇo’tipi
vattabbo”ti.
“Even though you say this, still the brahmins maintain their belief.” “What do you think, Assalāyana? Suppose an aristocrat boy was to sleep with a brahmin girl, and they had a child. Would that child be called an aristocrat after the father or a brahmin after the mother?” “They could be called either.”
‹ Previous · Page 3 of 5 · Next ›
Lite mode — plain HTML for e-readers and old browsers. Full version