With Caṅkī · Translation: Bhikkhu Sujato, SuttaCentral
Parallels & more translations on SuttaCentral
aparimāṇavaṇṇo
hi
so
bhavaṁ
gotamo.
Ekamekenapi
tena
aṅgena
samannāgato
na
arahati,
so
bhavaṁ
gotamo
amhākaṁ
dassanāya
upasaṅkamituṁ;
atha
kho
mayameva
arahāma
taṁ
bhavantaṁ
gotamaṁ
dassanāya
upasaṅkamitunti.
Tena
hi,
bho,
sabbeva
mayaṁ
samaṇaṁ
gotamaṁ
dassanāya
upasaṅkamissāmā”ti.
for the praise of the worthy Gotama is limitless. The possession of even a single one of these factors makes it inappropriate for Worthy Gotama to come to see me; rather, it’s appropriate for me to go to see him. Well then, gentlemen, let’s all go to see the ascetic Gotama.”
Atha
kho
caṅkī
brāhmaṇo
mahatā
brāhmaṇagaṇena
saddhiṁ
yena
bhagavā
tenupasaṅkami;
upasaṅkamitvā
bhagavatā
saddhiṁ
sammodi.
Sammodanīyaṁ
kathaṁ
sāraṇīyaṁ
vītisāretvā
ekamantaṁ
nisīdi.
Then Caṅkī together with a large group of brahmins went to the Buddha and exchanged greetings with him. When the greetings and polite conversation were over, he sat down to one side.
Tena
kho
pana
samayena
bhagavā
vuddhehi
vuddhehi
brāhmaṇehi
saddhiṁ
kiñci
kiñci
kathaṁ
sāraṇīyaṁ
vītisāretvā
nisinno
hoti.
Tena
kho
pana
samayena
kāpaṭiko
nāma
māṇavo
daharo
vuttasiro
soḷasavassuddesiko
jātiyā,
tiṇṇaṁ
vedānaṁ
pāragū
sanighaṇḍukeṭubhānaṁ
sākkharappabhedānaṁ
itihāsapañcamānaṁ,
padako,
veyyākaraṇo,
lokāyatamahāpurisalakkhaṇesu
anavayo
tassaṁ
parisāyaṁ
nisinno
hoti.
So
vuddhānaṁ
vuddhānaṁ
brāhmaṇānaṁ
bhagavatā
saddhiṁ
mantayamānānaṁ
antarantarā
kathaṁ
opāteti.
Atha
kho
bhagavā
kāpaṭikaṁ
māṇavaṁ
apasādeti:
“māyasmā
bhāradvājo
vuddhānaṁ
vuddhānaṁ
brāhmaṇānaṁ
mantayamānānaṁ
antarantarā
kathaṁ
opātetu.
Kathāpariyosānaṁ
āyasmā
bhāradvājo
āgametū”ti.
Evaṁ
vutte,
caṅkī
brāhmaṇo
bhagavantaṁ
etadavoca:
“mā
bhavaṁ
gotamo
kāpaṭikaṁ
māṇavaṁ
apasādesi.
Now at that time the Buddha was sitting engaged in some polite conversation together with some very senior brahmins. And the student Kāpaṭika was sitting in that assembly. He was young, tonsured, and sixteen years old. He had mastered the three Vedas, together with their vocabularies and ritual performance, their phonology and word classification, and the testaments as fifth. He knew them word-by-word, and their grammar. He was well versed in cosmology and the marks of a great man. While the senior brahmins were conversing together with the Buddha, he interrupted. Then the Buddha rebuked Kāpaṭika, “Venerable Bhāradvāja, don’t interrupt the senior brahmins. Wait until they’ve finished speaking.” When he had spoken, Caṅkī said to the Buddha, “Worthy Gotama, don’t rebuke the student Kāpaṭika.
kulaputto ca kāpaṭiko māṇavo, bahussuto ca kāpaṭiko māṇavo, paṇḍito ca kāpaṭiko māṇavo, kalyāṇavākkaraṇo ca kāpaṭiko māṇavo, pahoti ca kāpaṭiko māṇavo bhotā gotamena saddhiṁ asmiṁ vacane paṭimantetun”ti.
He’s a gentleman, learned and astute, who enunciates well. He is capable of debating with the worthy Gotama about this.”
Atha
kho
bhagavato
etadahosi:
“addhā
kho
kāpaṭikassa
māṇavassa
tevijjake
pāvacane
kathā
bhavissati.
Tathā
hi
naṁ
brāhmaṇā
sampurekkharontī”ti.
Atha
kho
kāpaṭikassa
māṇavassa
etadahosi:
“yadā
me
samaṇo
gotamo
cakkhuṁ
upasaṁharissati,
athāhaṁ
samaṇaṁ
gotamaṁ
pañhaṁ
pucchissāmī”ti.
Atha
kho
bhagavā
kāpaṭikassa
māṇavassa
cetasā
cetoparivitakkamaññāya
yena
kāpaṭiko
māṇavo
tena
cakkhūni
upasaṁhāsi.
Atha
kho
kāpaṭikassa
māṇavassa
etadahosi:
“samannāharati
kho
maṁ
samaṇo
gotamo.
Yannūnāhaṁ
samaṇaṁ
gotamaṁ
pañhaṁ
puccheyyan”ti.
Atha
kho
kāpaṭiko
māṇavo
bhagavantaṁ
etadavoca:
“yadidaṁ,
bho
gotama,
brāhmaṇānaṁ
porāṇaṁ
mantapadaṁ
itihitihaparamparāya
piṭakasampadāya,
tattha
ca
brāhmaṇā
ekaṁsena
niṭṭhaṁ
gacchanti:
‘idameva
saccaṁ,
moghamaññan’ti.
Idha
bhavaṁ
gotamo
kimāhā”ti?
Then it occurred to the Buddha, “Clearly the student Kāpaṭika will talk about the scriptural heritage of the three Vedas. That’s why the brahmins put him at the front.” Then Kāpaṭika thought, “When the ascetic Gotama looks at me, I’ll ask him a question.” Then the Buddha, knowing Kāpaṭika’s train of thought, looked at him. Then Kāpaṭika thought, “The ascetic Gotama is engaging with me. Why don’t I ask him a question?” Then he said, “Worthy Gotama, regarding that which by the lineage of testament and by canonical authority is the ancient hymnal of the brahmins, the brahmins come to the categorical conclusion: ‘This is the only truth, anything else is futile.’ What do you say about this?”
“Kiṁ
pana,
bhāradvāja,
atthi
koci
brāhmaṇānaṁ
ekabrāhmaṇopi
yo
evamāha:
‘ahametaṁ
jānāmi,
ahametaṁ
passāmi.
Idameva
saccaṁ,
moghamaññan’”ti?
“No
hidaṁ,
bho
gotama”.
“Kiṁ
pana,
bhāradvāja,
atthi
koci
brāhmaṇānaṁ
ekācariyopi,
ekācariyapācariyopi,
yāva
sattamā
ācariyamahayugāpi,
yo
evamāha:
‘ahametaṁ
jānāmi,
ahametaṁ
passāmi.
Idameva
saccaṁ,
moghamaññan’”ti?
“No
hidaṁ,
bho
gotama”.
“Kiṁ
pana,
bhāradvāja,
yepi
te
brāhmaṇānaṁ
pubbakā
isayo
mantānaṁ
kattāro
mantānaṁ
pavattāro
yesamidaṁ
etarahi
brāhmaṇā
porāṇaṁ
mantapadaṁ
gītaṁ
pavuttaṁ
samihitaṁ
tadanugāyanti
tadanubhāsanti
bhāsitamanubhāsanti
vācitamanuvācenti
seyyathidaṁ—aṭṭhako
vāmako
vāmadevo
vessāmitto
yamataggi
aṅgīraso
bhāradvājo
vāseṭṭho
kassapo
bhagu,
tepi
evamāhaṁsu:
‘mayametaṁ
jānāma,
mayametaṁ
passāma.
Idameva
saccaṁ,
moghamaññan’”ti?
“No
hidaṁ,
bho
gotama”.
“Iti
kira,
bhāradvāja,
natthi
koci
brāhmaṇānaṁ
ekabrāhmaṇopi
yo
evamāha:
“Well, Bhāradvāja, is there even a single one of the brahmins who says this: ‘I know this, I see this: this is the only truth, anything else is futile’?” “No, worthy Gotama.” “Well, is there even a single tutor of the brahmins, or a tutors’ tutor, or anyone back to the seventh generation of tutors, who says this: ‘I know this, I see this: this is the only truth, anything else is futile’?” “No, worthy Gotama.” “Well, what of the ancient seers of the brahmins, namely Aṭṭhaka, Vāmaka, Vāmadeva, Vessāmitta, Yamadaggi, Aṅgīrasa, Bhāradvāja, Vāseṭṭha, Kassapa, and Bhagu? They were the authors and propagators of the hymns. Their hymnal was sung and propagated and compiled in ancient times; and these days, brahmins continue to sing and chant it, chanting what was chanted and teaching what was taught. Did even they say: ‘We know this, we see this: this is the only truth, anything else is futile’?” “No, worthy Gotama.” “So, Bhāradvāja, it seems that there is not a single one of the brahmins,
‘ahametaṁ
jānāmi,
ahametaṁ
passāmi.
Idameva
saccaṁ,
moghamaññan’ti;
natthi
koci
brāhmaṇānaṁ
ekācariyopi
ekācariyapācariyopi,
yāva
sattamā
ācariyamahayugāpi,
yo
evamāha:
‘ahametaṁ
jānāmi,
ahametaṁ
passāmi.
Idameva
saccaṁ,
moghamaññan’ti;
yepi
te
brāhmaṇānaṁ
pubbakā
isayo
mantānaṁ
kattāro
mantānaṁ
pavattāro
yesamidaṁ
etarahi
brāhmaṇā
porāṇaṁ
mantapadaṁ
gītaṁ
pavuttaṁ
samihitaṁ
tadanugāyanti
tadanubhāsanti
bhāsitamanubhāsanti
vācitamanuvācenti
seyyathidaṁ—aṭṭhako
vāmako
vāmadevo
vessāmitto
yamataggi
aṅgīraso
bhāradvājo
vāseṭṭho
kassapo
bhagu,
tepi
na
evamāhaṁsu:
‘mayametaṁ
jānāma,
mayametaṁ
passāma.
Idameva
saccaṁ,
moghamaññan’ti.
Seyyathāpi,
bhāradvāja,
andhaveṇi
paramparāsaṁsattā
purimopi
na
passati
majjhimopi
na
passati
pacchimopi
na
passati;
evameva
kho,
bhāradvāja,
andhaveṇūpamaṁ
maññe
brāhmaṇānaṁ
bhāsitaṁ
sampajjati—purimopi
na
passati
majjhimopi
na
passati
pacchimopi
na
passati.
Taṁ
kiṁ
maññasi,
bhāradvāja,
not even anyone back to the seventh generation of tutors, nor even the ancient seers of the brahmins who say: ‘We know this, we see this: this is the only truth, anything else is futile.’ Suppose there was a queue of blind men, each holding the one in front: the first one does not see, the middle one does not see, and the last one does not see. In the same way, it seems to me that the brahmins’ statement turns out to be like a queue of blind men: the first one does not see, the middle one does not see, and the last one does not see. What do you think, Bhāradvāja?
‹ Previous · Page 3 of 6 · Next ›
Lite mode — plain HTML for e-readers and old browsers. Full version