With Esukārī · Translation: Bhikkhu Sujato, SuttaCentral
Parallels & more translations on SuttaCentral
Suddakulā cepi, brāhmaṇa, agārasmā anagāriyaṁ pabbajito hoti, so ca tathāgatappaveditaṁ dhammavinayaṁ āgamma pāṇātipātā paṭivirato hoti …pe… sammādiṭṭhi hoti, ārādhako hoti ñāyaṁ dhammaṁ kusalaṁ.
menials goes forth from the lay life to homelessness. Relying on the teaching and training proclaimed by the Realized One … they succeed in the system of the skillful teaching.
Taṁ
kiṁ
maññasi,
brāhmaṇa,
brāhmaṇova
nu
kho
pahoti
asmiṁ
padese
averaṁ
abyābajjhaṁ
mettacittaṁ
bhāvetuṁ,
no
khattiyo
no
vesso
no
suddo”ti?
“No
hidaṁ,
bho
gotama.
Khattiyopi
hi,
bho
gotama,
pahoti
asmiṁ
padese
averaṁ
abyābajjhaṁ
mettacittaṁ
bhāvetuṁ;
brāhmaṇopi
hi,
bho
gotama
…
vessopi
hi,
bho
gotama
…
suddopi
hi,
bho
gotama
…
sabbepi
hi,
bho
gotama,
cattāro
vaṇṇā
pahonti
asmiṁ
padese
averaṁ
abyābajjhaṁ
mettacittaṁ
bhāvetun”ti.
“Evameva
kho,
brāhmaṇa,
khattiyakulā
cepi
agārasmā
anagāriyaṁ
pabbajito
hoti,
so
ca
tathāgatappaveditaṁ
dhammavinayaṁ
āgamma
pāṇātipātā
paṭivirato
hoti
…pe…
sammādiṭṭhi
hoti,
ārādhako
hoti
ñāyaṁ
dhammaṁ
kusalaṁ.
Brāhmaṇakulā
cepi,
brāhmaṇa
…
vessakulā
cepi,
brāhmaṇa
…
What do you think, brahmin? Is only a brahmin capable of developing a heart of love free of enmity and ill will for this region, and not an aristocrat, peasant, or menial?” “No, worthy Gotama. Aristocrats, brahmins, peasants, and menials can all do so. For all four classes are capable of developing a heart of love free of enmity and ill will for this region.” “In the same way, suppose someone from a family of aristocrats, brahmins, peasants,
suddakulā cepi, brāhmaṇa, agārasmā anagāriyaṁ pabbajito hoti, so ca tathāgatappaveditaṁ dhammavinayaṁ āgamma pāṇātipātā paṭivirato hoti …pe… sammādiṭṭhi hoti, ārādhako hoti ñāyaṁ dhammaṁ kusalaṁ.
or menials goes forth from the lay life to homelessness. Relying on the teaching and training proclaimed by the Realized One … they succeed in the system of the skillful teaching.
Taṁ
kiṁ
maññasi,
brāhmaṇa,
brāhmaṇova
nu
kho
pahoti
sottisināniṁ
ādāya
nadiṁ
gantvā
rajojallaṁ
pavāhetuṁ,
no
khattiyo
no
vesso
no
suddo”ti?
“No
hidaṁ,
bho
gotama.
Khattiyopi
hi,
bho
gotama,
pahoti
sottisināniṁ
ādāya
nadiṁ
gantvā
rajojallaṁ
pavāhetuṁ;
brāhmaṇopi
hi,
bho
gotama
…
vessopi
hi,
bho
gotama
…
suddopi
hi,
bho
gotama
…
sabbepi
hi,
bho
gotama,
cattāro
vaṇṇā
pahonti
sottisināniṁ
ādāya
nadiṁ
gantvā
rajojallaṁ
pavāhetun”ti.
“Evameva
kho,
brāhmaṇa,
khattiyakulā
cepi
agārasmā
anagāriyaṁ
pabbajito
hoti,
so
ca
tathāgatappaveditaṁ
dhammavinayaṁ
āgamma
pāṇātipātā
paṭivirato
hoti
…pe…
sammādiṭṭhi
hoti,
ārādhako
hoti
ñāyaṁ
dhammaṁ
kusalaṁ.
Brāhmaṇakulā
cepi,
brāhmaṇa
…
vessakulā
cepi,
brāhmaṇa
…
What do you think, brahmin? Is only a brahmin capable of taking some bathing cleanser, going to the river, and rinsing off dust and dirt, and not an aristocrat, peasant, or menial?” “No, worthy Gotama. All four classes are capable of doing this.” “In the same way, suppose someone from a family of aristocrats, brahmins, peasants,
suddakulā cepi, brāhmaṇa, agārasmā anagāriyaṁ pabbajito hoti, so ca tathāgatappaveditaṁ dhammavinayaṁ āgamma pāṇātipātā paṭivirato hoti …pe… sammādiṭṭhi hoti, ārādhako hoti ñāyaṁ dhammaṁ kusalaṁ.
or menials goes forth from the lay life to homelessness. Relying on the teaching and training proclaimed by the Realized One … they succeed in the system of the skillful teaching.
Taṁ
kiṁ
maññasi,
brāhmaṇa,
idha
rājā
khattiyo
muddhāvasitto
nānājaccānaṁ
purisānaṁ
purisasataṁ
sannipāteyya:
‘āyantu
bhonto
ye
tattha
khattiyakulā
brāhmaṇakulā
rājaññakulā
uppannā
sākassa
vā
sālassa
vā
salaḷassa
vā
candanassa
vā
padumakassa
vā
uttarāraṇiṁ
ādāya
aggiṁ
abhinibbattentu,
tejo
pātukarontu;
āyantu
pana
bhonto
ye
tattha
caṇḍālakulā
nesādakulā
venakulā
rathakārakulā
pukkusakulā
uppannā
sāpānadoṇiyā
vā
sūkaradoṇiyā
vā
rajakadoṇiyā
vā
eraṇḍakaṭṭhassa
vā
uttarāraṇiṁ
ādāya
aggiṁ
abhinibbattentu,
tejo
pātukarontū’”ti?
“Taṁ
kiṁ
maññasi,
brāhmaṇa,
What do you think, brahmin? Suppose an anointed aristocratic king were to gather a hundred people born in different classes and say to them: ‘Please gentlemen, let anyone here who was born in a family of aristocrats, brahmins, or chieftains take a drill-stick made of teak, sal, salaḷa, sandalwood, or cherry wood, light a fire and produce heat. And let anyone here who was born in a family of corpse-workers, hunters, bamboo-workers, chariot-makers, or scavengers take a drill-stick made from a mutt’s drinking trough, a pig’s trough, a dustbin, or castor-oil wood, light a fire and produce heat.’ What do you think, brahmin?
yo
evaṁ
nu
kho
so
khattiyakulā
brāhmaṇakulā
rājaññakulā
uppannehi
sākassa
vā
sālassa
vā
salaḷassa
vā
candanassa
vā
padumakassa
vā
uttarāraṇiṁ
ādāya
aggi
abhinibbatto
tejo
pātukato
so
eva
nu
khvāssa
aggi
accimā
ceva
vaṇṇavā
ca
pabhassaro
ca
tena
ca
sakkā
agginā
aggikaraṇīyaṁ
kātuṁ;
yo
pana
so
caṇḍālakulā
nesādakulā
venakulā
rathakārakulā
pukkusakulā
uppannehi
sāpānadoṇiyā
vā
sūkaradoṇiyā
vā
rajakadoṇiyā
vā
eraṇḍakaṭṭhassa
vā
uttarāraṇiṁ
ādāya
aggi
abhinibbatto
tejo
pātukato
svāssa
aggi
na
ceva
accimā
na
ca
vaṇṇavā
na
ca
pabhassaro
na
ca
tena
sakkā
agginā
aggikaraṇīyaṁ
kātun”ti?
“No
hidaṁ,
bho
gotama.
Would only the fire produced by the high class people with good quality wood have flames, color, and radiance, and be usable as fire, and not the fire produced by the low class people with poor quality wood?” “No, worthy Gotama.
Yopi
hi
so,
bho
gotama,
khattiyakulā
brāhmaṇakulā
rājaññakulā
uppannehi
sākassa
vā
sālassa
vā
salaḷassa
vā
candanassa
vā
padumakassa
vā
uttarāraṇiṁ
ādāya
aggi
abhinibbatto
tejo
pātukato
svāssa
aggi
accimā
ceva
vaṇṇavā
ca
pabhassaro
ca
tena
ca
sakkā
agginā
aggikaraṇīyaṁ
kātuṁ;
yopi
so
caṇḍālakulā
nesādakulā
venakulā
rathakārakulā
pukkusakulā
uppannehi
sāpānadoṇiyā
vā
sūkaradoṇiyā
vā
rajakadoṇiyā
vā
eraṇḍakaṭṭhassa
vā
uttarāraṇiṁ
ādāya
aggi
abhinibbatto
tejo
pātukato
svāssa
aggi
accimā
ceva
vaṇṇavā
ca
pabhassaro
ca
tena
ca
sakkā
agginā
aggikaraṇīyaṁ
kātuṁ.
Sabbopi
hi,
bho
gotama,
aggi
accimā
ceva
vaṇṇavā
ca
pabhassaro
ca
sabbenapi
sakkā
agginā
aggikaraṇīyaṁ
kātun”ti.
The fire produced by the high class people with good quality wood would have flames, color, and radiance, and be usable as fire, and so would the fire produced by the low class people with poor quality wood. For all fire has flames, color, and radiance, and is usable as fire.”
“Evameva
kho,
brāhmaṇa,
khattiyakulā
cepi
agārasmā
anagāriyaṁ
pabbajito
hoti,
so
ca
tathāgatappaveditaṁ
dhammavinayaṁ
āgamma
pāṇātipātā
paṭivirato
hoti
…pe…
sammādiṭṭhi
hoti,
ārādhako
hoti
ñāyaṁ
dhammaṁ
kusalaṁ.
Brāhmaṇakulā
cepi,
brāhmaṇa
…
vessakulā
cepi,
brāhmaṇa
…
suddakulā
cepi,
brāhmaṇa,
agārasmā
anagāriyaṁ
pabbajito
hoti,
so
ca
tathāgatappaveditaṁ
dhammavinayaṁ
āgamma
pāṇātipātā
paṭivirato
hoti,
adinnādānā
paṭivirato
hoti,
abrahmacariyā
paṭivirato
hoti,
musāvādā
paṭivirato
hoti,
pisuṇāya
vācāya
paṭivirato
hoti,
pharusāya
vācāya
paṭivirato
hoti,
samphappalāpā
paṭivirato
hoti,
anabhijjhālu
hoti,
abyāpannacitto
hoti,
sammādiṭṭhi
hoti,
ārādhako
hoti
ñāyaṁ
dhammaṁ
kusalan”ti.
“In the same way, suppose someone from a family of aristocrats, brahmins, peasants, or menials goes forth from the lay life to homelessness. Relying on the teaching and training proclaimed by the Realized One they refrain from killing living creatures, stealing, and sex. They refrain from using speech that’s false, divisive, harsh, or nonsensical. And they’re content, kind-hearted, with right view. They succeed in the system of the skillful teaching.”
Evaṁ
vutte,
esukārī
brāhmaṇo
bhagavantaṁ
etadavoca:
“abhikkantaṁ,
bho
gotama,
abhikkantaṁ,
bho
gotama
…pe…
upāsakaṁ
maṁ
bhavaṁ
gotamo
dhāretu
ajjatagge
pāṇupetaṁ
saraṇaṁ
gatan”ti.
Esukārīsuttaṁ
niṭṭhitaṁ
chaṭṭhaṁ.
When he had spoken, Esukārī said to him, “Excellent, worthy Gotama! Excellent! … From this day forth, may the worthy Gotama remember me as a lay follower who has gone for refuge for life.”
‹ Previous · Page 3 of 3
Lite mode — plain HTML for e-readers and old browsers. Full version