The Five and Three · Translation: Bhikkhu Sujato, SuttaCentral
Parallels & more translations on SuttaCentral
thusEvaṁ
by meme
heardsutaṁ—
oneekaṁ
timesamayaṁ
the Blessed Onebhagavā
at Sāvatthīsāvatthiyaṁ
was stayingviharati
in Jeta's Grovejetavane
of Anāthapiṇḍikaanāthapiṇḍikassa
monastery.ārāme.
thereTatra
indeedkho
the Blessed Onebhagavā
the mendicantsbhikkhū
addressed:āmantesi:
mendicant + quotation marker“bhikkhavo”ti.
venerable sir + quotation marker“Bhadante”ti
theyte
the mendicantsbhikkhū
to the Blessed Onebhagavato
replied.paccassosuṁ.
the Blessed OneBhagavā
this + saidetadavoca:
So I have heard. At one time the Buddha was staying near Sāvatthī in Jeta’s Grove, Anāthapiṇḍika’s monastery. There the Buddha addressed the mendicants, “Mendicants!” “Venerable sir,” they replied. The Buddha said this:
there are“santi,
mendicantsbhikkhave,
someeke
ascetic·brahminsamaṇabrāhmaṇā
final end·theoristaparantakappikā
who speculate about the final endaparantānudiṭṭhino
concerning the final endaparantaṁ
concerningārabbha
many·variousanekavihitāni
hypothesis·statementadhivuttipadāni
proposeabhivadanti.
percipient‘Saññī
selfattā
ishoti
healthyarogo
afterparaṁ
deathmaraṇā’ti—
thus someittheke
proposeabhivadanti;
non-percipient‘asaññī
selfattā
ishoti
healthyarogo
afterparaṁ
deathmaraṇā’ti—
thus someittheke
proposeabhivadanti;
neither percipient nor non-percipient‘nevasaññīnāsaññī
selfattā
ishoti
healthyarogo
afterparaṁ
deathmaraṇā’ti—
thus someittheke
proposeabhivadanti;
existingsato
orvā
butpana
of a beingsattassa
annihilationucchedaṁ
eradicationvināsaṁ
nonexistencevibhavaṁ
assertpaññapenti,
seen·dhamma·extinguishmentdiṭṭhadhammanibbānaṁ
orvā
but somepaneke
proposeabhivadanti.
thusIti
existentsantaṁ
orvā
selfattānaṁ
assertpaññapenti
healthyarogaṁ
afterparaṁ
deathmaraṇā,
existingsato
orvā
butpana
of a beingsattassa
annihilationucchedaṁ
eradicationvināsaṁ
nonexistencevibhavaṁ
assertpaññapenti,
seen·dhamma·extinguishmentdiṭṭhadhammanibbānaṁ
orvā
but somepaneke
proposeabhivadanti.
thusIti
theseimāni
fivepañca
having beenhutvā
threetīṇi
becomehonti,
threetīṇi
having beenhutvā
fivepañca
becomehonti—
this·summary recitalayamuddeso
of the five and threepañcattayassa.
“Mendicants, there are some ascetics and brahmins who speculate and theorize about the final end, and propose various hypotheses concerning the final end. Some propose this: ‘The self is percipient and healthy after death.’ Some propose this: ‘The self is non-percipient and healthy after death.’ Some propose this: ‘The self is neither percipient nor non-percipient and healthy after death.’ But some assert the annihilation, eradication, and nonexistence of an existing being, while others propose extinguishment in this life. Thus they assert an existent self that is healthy after death; or they assert the annihilation of an existing being; while some propose extinguishment in this life. In this way five become three, and three become five. This is the summary recital of the five and three.
thereTatra, monksbhikkhave, whoye thosete ascetic + brahminsamaṇabrāhmaṇā percipientsaññiṁ selfattānaṁ proposepaññapenti healthyarogaṁ afterparaṁ deathmaraṇā, formedrūpiṁ orvā thosete sirsbhonto ascetic + brahminsamaṇabrāhmaṇā percipientsaññiṁ selfattānaṁ proposepaññapenti healthyarogaṁ afterparaṁ deathmaraṇā, formlessarūpiṁ orvā thosete sirsbhonto ascetic + brahminsamaṇabrāhmaṇā percipientsaññiṁ selfattānaṁ proposepaññapenti healthyarogaṁ afterparaṁ deathmaraṇā, both formedrūpiñca and formlessarūpiñca orvā thosete sirsbhonto ascetic + brahminsamaṇabrāhmaṇā percipientsaññiṁ selfattānaṁ proposepaññapenti healthyarogaṁ afterparaṁ deathmaraṇā, neither formednevarūpiṁ nor formlessnārūpiṁ orvā thosete sirsbhonto ascetic + brahminsamaṇabrāhmaṇā percipientsaññiṁ selfattānaṁ proposepaññapenti healthyarogaṁ afterparaṁ deathmaraṇā, of unified perceptionekattasaññiṁ orvā thosete sirsbhonto ascetic + brahminsamaṇabrāhmaṇā percipientsaññiṁ selfattānaṁ proposepaññapenti healthyarogaṁ afterparaṁ deathmaraṇā, of diverse perceptionnānattasaññiṁ orvā thosete sirsbhonto ascetic + brahminsamaṇabrāhmaṇā percipientsaññiṁ selfattānaṁ proposepaññapenti healthyarogaṁ afterparaṁ deathmaraṇā, of limited perceptionparittasaññiṁ orvā thosete sirsbhonto ascetic + brahminsamaṇabrāhmaṇā percipientsaññiṁ selfattānaṁ proposepaññapenti healthyarogaṁ afterparaṁ deathmaraṇā, of limitless perceptionappamāṇasaññiṁ orvā thosete sirsbhonto ascetic + brahminsamaṇabrāhmaṇā percipientsaññiṁ selfattānaṁ proposepaññapenti healthyarogaṁ afterparaṁ deathmaraṇā, thisetaṁ orvā but for somepanekesaṁ of those going beyondupātivattataṁ universal consciousnessviññāṇakasiṇameke they describeabhivadanti limitlessappamāṇaṁ imperturbableāneñjaṁ.
Now, the ascetics and brahmins who propose a self that is percipient and healthy after death describe it as formed, or formless, or both formed and formless, or neither formed nor formless. Or they propose a self of unified perception, or of diverse perception, or of limited perception, or of limitless perception. Or some among those who go beyond this propose universal consciousness, limitless and imperturbable.
that + which·thisTayidaṁ, monksbhikkhave, thus·gonetathāgato higher·knowabhijānāti.
The Realized One understands this as follows.
whoYe indeedkho thosete sirsbhonto ascetic·brahminsamaṇabrāhmaṇā percipientsaññiṁ selfattānaṁ they assertpaññapenti healthyarogaṁ afterparaṁ deathmaraṇā, formedrūpiṁ orvā thosete sirsbhonto ascetic·brahminsamaṇabrāhmaṇā percipientsaññiṁ selfattānaṁ they assertpaññapenti healthyarogaṁ afterparaṁ deathmaraṇā, formlessarūpiṁ orvā thosete sirsbhonto ascetic·brahminsamaṇabrāhmaṇā percipientsaññiṁ selfattānaṁ they assertpaññapenti healthyarogaṁ afterparaṁ deathmaraṇā, formed·andrūpiñca formless·andarūpiñca orvā thosete sirsbhonto ascetic·brahminsamaṇabrāhmaṇā percipientsaññiṁ selfattānaṁ they assertpaññapenti healthyarogaṁ afterparaṁ deathmaraṇā, neither formednevarūpiṁ nor formlessnārūpiṁ orvā thosete sirsbhonto ascetic·brahminsamaṇabrāhmaṇā percipientsaññiṁ selfattānaṁ they assertpaññapenti healthyarogaṁ afterparaṁ deathmaraṇā, of unified perceptionekattasaññiṁ orvā thosete sirsbhonto ascetic·brahminsamaṇabrāhmaṇā percipientsaññiṁ selfattānaṁ they assertpaññapenti healthyarogaṁ afterparaṁ deathmaraṇā, of diverse perceptionnānattasaññiṁ orvā thosete sirsbhonto ascetic·brahminsamaṇabrāhmaṇā percipientsaññiṁ selfattānaṁ they assertpaññapenti healthyarogaṁ afterparaṁ deathmaraṇā, of limited perceptionparittasaññiṁ orvā thosete sirsbhonto ascetic·brahminsamaṇabrāhmaṇā percipientsaññiṁ selfattānaṁ they assertpaññapenti healthyarogaṁ afterparaṁ deathmaraṇā, of limitless perceptionappamāṇasaññiṁ orvā thosete sirsbhonto ascetic·brahminsamaṇabrāhmaṇā percipientsaññiṁ selfattānaṁ they assertpaññapenti healthyarogaṁ afterparaṁ deathmaraṇā, whicheveryā orvā but + of thesepanetāsaṁ of perceptionssaññānaṁ purestparisuddhā supremeparamā highestaggā unsurpassedanuttariyā it is declaredakkhāyati—
There are ascetics and brahmins who assert a self that is percipient and healthy after death, describing it as formed, or formless, or both formed and formless, or neither formed nor formless. Or they describe it as of unified perception, or of diverse perception, or of limited perception, or of limitless perception.
ifyadi
form·perceptionrūpasaññānaṁ
ifyadi
not·form·perceptionarūpasaññānaṁ
ifyadi
unity·perceptionekattasaññānaṁ
ifyadi
diversity·perceptionnānattasaññānaṁ.
there is not‘Natthi
anythingkiñcī’ti
nothingness·dimension + someākiñcaññāyatanameke
towards·sayabhivadanti
not·measureappamāṇaṁ
not·movingāneñjaṁ.
that‘Tayidaṁ
together·madesaṅkhataṁ
coarseoḷārikaṁ
there isatthi
indeedkho
butpana
together·makingsaṅkhārānaṁ
cessationnirodho
that is realatthetan’ti—
thusiti
having understoodviditvā
of ittassa
escape·seeingnissaraṇadassāvī
thus·gonetathāgato
that·beyond·gonetadupātivatto.
Or some, aware that ‘there is nothing at all’, propose the dimension of nothingness, limitless and imperturbable. They declare that this is the purest, highest, best, and supreme of all those perceptions, whether of form or of formlessness or of unity or of diversity. ‘That much is conditioned and crude. But there is the cessation of conditions—that is real.’ Understanding this and seeing the escape from it, the Realized One has gone beyond all that.
thereTatra, monksbhikkhave, whoye thosete ascetic·brahminsamaṇabrāhmaṇā not·percipientasaññiṁ selfattānaṁ assertpaññapenti not·illarogaṁ afterparaṁ deathmaraṇā, formedrūpiṁ orvā thosete sirsbhonto ascetic·brahminsamaṇabrāhmaṇā not·percipientasaññiṁ selfattānaṁ assertpaññapenti not·illarogaṁ afterparaṁ deathmaraṇā, not·formedarūpiṁ orvā thosete sirsbhonto ascetic·brahminsamaṇabrāhmaṇā not·percipientasaññiṁ selfattānaṁ assertpaññapenti not·illarogaṁ afterparaṁ deathmaraṇā, formed·andrūpiñca formless·andarūpiñca orvā thosete sirsbhonto ascetic·brahminsamaṇabrāhmaṇā not·percipientasaññiṁ selfattānaṁ assertpaññapenti not·illarogaṁ afterparaṁ deathmaraṇā, not·formednevarūpiṁ not·formednārūpiṁ orvā thosete sirsbhonto ascetic·brahminsamaṇabrāhmaṇā not·percipientasaññiṁ selfattānaṁ assertpaññapenti not·illarogaṁ afterparaṁ deathmaraṇā.
Now, the ascetics and brahmins who assert a self that is non-percipient and healthy after death describe it as formed, or formless, or both formed and formless, or neither formed nor formless.
Page 1 of 4 · Next ›
Lite mode — plain HTML for e-readers and old browsers. Full version