The Shorter Discourse With Māluṅkya · Translation: Bhikkhu Sujato, SuttaCentral
Parallels & more translations on SuttaCentral
not‘na
so long Itāvāhaṁ
thisimaṁ
arrowsallaṁ
I will extractāharissāmi
as long asyāva
notna
thattaṁ
personpurisaṁ
I knowjānāmi
by which I wasyenamhi
piercedviddho,
talldīgho
orvā
shortrasso
orvā
mediummajjhimo
orvā’ti;
heso
soevaṁ
might sayvadeyya:
not‘na
so long Itāvāhaṁ
thisimaṁ
arrowsallaṁ
I will extractāharissāmi
as long asyāva
notna
thattaṁ
personpurisaṁ
I knowjānāmi
by which I wasyenamhi
piercedviddho,
blackkāḷo
orvā
brownsāmo
orvā
dingy-skinnedmaṅguracchavī
orvā’ti;
heso
soevaṁ
might sayvadeyya:
not‘na
so long Itāvāhaṁ
thisimaṁ
arrowsallaṁ
I will extractāharissāmi
as long asyāva
notna
thattaṁ
personpurisaṁ
I knowjānāmi
by which I wasyenamhi
piercedviddho,
in such-and-suchamukasmiṁ
villagegāme
orvā
townnigame
orvā
citynagare
orvā’ti;
heso
soevaṁ
might sayvadeyya:
not‘na
so long Itāvāhaṁ
thisimaṁ
arrowsallaṁ
I will extractāharissāmi
as long asyāva
notna
thattaṁ
bowdhanuṁ
I knowjānāmi
by which I wasyenamhi
piercedviddho,
ifyadi
orvā
straightcāpo
ifyadi
orvā
recurvedkodaṇḍo’ti;
heso
soevaṁ
might sayvadeyya:
whether he’s tall, short, or medium; whether his skin is black, brown, or dingy; and whether he comes from such-and-such village, town, or city. I won’t extract this arrow as long as I don’t know whether the bow that wounded me was straight or recurved;
not‘na
so long Itāvāhaṁ
thisimaṁ
arrowsallaṁ
I will extractāharissāmi
as long asyāva
notna
thattaṁ
bow-stringjiyaṁ
I knowjānāmi
by which I amyāyamhi
piercedviddho,
whetheryadi
orvā
swallow-wort fibreakkassa
whetheryadi
orvā
sunn hemp fibresaṇhassa
whetheryadi
orvā
sinewnhārussa
whetheryadi
orvā
sansevieria fibremaruvāya
whetheryadi
orvā
spurge fibrekhīrapaṇṇino’ti;
heso
thusevaṁ
might sayvadeyya:
not‘na
so long Itāvāhaṁ
thisimaṁ
arrowsallaṁ
I will extractāharissāmi
as long asyāva
notna
thattaṁ
shaftkaṇḍaṁ
I knowjānāmi
by which I amyenamhi
piercedviddho,
whetheryadi
orvā
bushgacchaṁ
whetheryadi
orvā
plantation treeropiman’ti;
heso
thusevaṁ
might sayvadeyya:
not‘na
so long Itāvāhaṁ
thisimaṁ
arrowsallaṁ
I will extractāharissāmi
as long asyāva
notna
thattaṁ
shaftkaṇḍaṁ
I knowjānāmi
by which I amyenamhi
piercedviddho,
of whichyassa
with featherspattehi
fittedvājitaṁ
whetheryadi
orvā
vulturegijjhassa
whetheryadi
orvā
heronkaṅkassa
whetheryadi
orvā
hawkkulalassa
whetheryadi
orvā
peacockmorassa
whetheryadi
orvā
storksithilahanuno’ti;
heso
thusevaṁ
might sayvadeyya:
whether the bow-string is made of swallow-wort fibre, sunn hemp fibre, sinew, sanseveria fibre, or spurge fibre; whether the shaft is made from a bush or a plantation tree; whether the shaft was fitted with feathers from a vulture, a heron, a hawk, a peacock, or a stork;
not‘na
yet Itāvāhaṁ
thisimaṁ
arrowsallaṁ
will extractāharissāmi
as long asyāva
notna
thattaṁ
shaftkaṇḍaṁ
I knowjānāmi
by whichyenamhi
piercedviddho,
of whichyassa
with sinewnhārunā
boundparikkhittaṁ
ifyadi
orvā
of a cowgavassa
ifyadi
orvā
of a buffalomahiṁsassa
ifyadi
orvā
of a black lionbheravassa
ifyadi
orvā
of an ape'semhārassā’ti;
heso
thusevaṁ
would sayvadeyya:
not‘na
yet Itāvāhaṁ
thisimaṁ
arrowsallaṁ
will extractāharissāmi
as long asyāva
notna
thattaṁ
arrowsallaṁ
I knowjānāmi
by whichyenamhi
piercedviddho,
ifyadi
orvā
spikedsallaṁ
ifyadi
orvā
razor-tippedkhurappaṁ
ifyadi
orvā
barbedvekaṇḍaṁ
ifyadi
orvā
of ironnārācaṁ
ifyadi
orvā
of calf's toothvacchadantaṁ
ifyadi
orvā
lancet-shaped'karavīrapattan’ti—
unlearned indeedaññātameva
thattaṁ,
Mālukyaputtamālukyaputta,
by thattena
by that manpurisena
would beassa,
thenatha
thatso
manpuriso
timekālaṁ
would dokareyya.
in the same wayEvameva
indeedkho,
Mālukyaputtamālukyaputta,
whoyo
thusevaṁ
would sayvadeyya:
not‘na
yet Itāvāhaṁ
under the Blessed Onebhagavati
the spiritual lifebrahmacariyaṁ
will leadcarissāmi
as long asyāva
to meme
the Blessed Onebhagavā
notna
will declarebyākarissati:
eternal“sassato
the cosmosloko”ti
orvā
not eternal“asassato
the cosmosloko”ti
orvā
…pe……pe…
whether the shaft was bound with sinews of a cow, a buffalo, a black lion, or an ape; and whether the arrowhead was spiked, razor-tipped, barbed, made of iron or a calf’s tooth, or lancet-shaped.’ That man would still not have learned these things, and meanwhile they’d die. In the same way, suppose someone was to say: ‘I will not lead the spiritual life under the Buddha until the Buddha declares to me that the cosmos is eternal, or that the cosmos is not eternal …
neither“neva
still existshoti
norna
notna
still existshoti
the realized onetathāgato
afterparaṁ
deathmaraṇā”ti
orvā’ti—
just undeclaredabyākatameva
thattaṁ,
Māluṅkyaputtamālukyaputta,
by the realized onetathāgatena
it would beassa,
and meanwhileatha
thatso
individualpuggalo
timekālaṁ
would diekareyya.
or that after death a realized one neither still exists nor no longer exists.’ That would still remain undeclared by the Realized One, and meanwhile that individual would die.
'eternal‘Sassato
the cosmos is'loko’ti,
Māluṅkyaputtamālukyaputta,
of viewdiṭṭhiyā
there beingsati
living of the spiritual lifebrahmacariyavāso
there would be;abhavissāti,
soevaṁ
not.no.
'not eternal‘Asassato
the cosmos is'loko’ti,
Māluṅkyaputtamālukyaputta,
of viewdiṭṭhiyā
there beingsati
living of the spiritual lifebrahmacariyavāso
there would be;abhavissāti,
so tooevampi
not.no.
'eternal‘Sassato
the cosmos is'loko’ti
or,vā,
Māluṅkyaputtamālukyaputta,
of viewdiṭṭhiyā
there being,sati,
'not eternal‘asassato
the cosmos is'loko’ti
orvā
of viewdiṭṭhiyā
there beingsati
still there isattheva
rebirth,jāti,
there isatthi
old age,jarā,
there isatthi
death,maraṇaṁ,
there aresanti
sorrow, lamentation, pain, sadness, and distress;sokaparidevadukkhadomanassupāyāsā;
of which Iyesāhaṁ
in this very lifediṭṭheva
in the dhammadhamme
the defeatnighātaṁ
I advocate.paññapemi.
'finite‘Antavā
the cosmos is'loko’ti,
Māluṅkyaputtamālukyaputta,
of viewdiṭṭhiyā
there beingsati
living of the spiritual lifebrahmacariyavāso
there would be;abhavissāti,
soevaṁ
not.no.
'infinite‘Anantavā
the cosmos is'loko’ti,
Māluṅkyaputtamālukyaputta,
of viewdiṭṭhiyā
there beingsati
living of the spiritual lifebrahmacariyavāso
there would be;abhavissāti,
so tooevampi
not.no.
'finite‘Antavā
the cosmos is'loko’ti
or,vā,
Māluṅkyaputtamālukyaputta,
of viewdiṭṭhiyā
there being,sati,
'infinite‘anantavā
the cosmos is'loko’ti
orvā
of viewdiṭṭhiyā
there beingsati
still there isattheva
rebirth,jāti,
there isatthi
old age,jarā,
there isatthi
death,maraṇaṁ,
there aresanti
sorrow, lamentation, pain, sadness, and distress;sokaparidevadukkhadomanassupāyāsā;
of which Iyesāhaṁ
in this very lifediṭṭheva
in the dhammadhamme
the defeatnighātaṁ
I advocate.paññapemi.
'the soul‘Taṁ
isjīvaṁ
the same astaṁ
the body'sarīran’ti,
Māluṅkyaputtamālukyaputta,
of viewdiṭṭhiyā
there beingsati
living of the spiritual lifebrahmacariyavāso
there would be;abhavissāti,
soevaṁ
not.no.
It’s not true that if there were the view ‘the cosmos is eternal’ there would be the living of the spiritual life. It’s not true that if there were the view ‘the cosmos is not eternal’ there would be the living of the spiritual life. When there is the view that the cosmos is eternal or that the cosmos is not eternal, there is rebirth, there is old age, there is death, and there is sorrow, lamentation, pain, sadness, and distress. And it is the defeat of these things in this very life that I advocate. It’s not true that if there were the view ‘the cosmos is finite’ … ‘the cosmos is infinite’ … ‘the soul and the body are one and the same’ …
one thing‘Aññaṁ
the souljīvaṁ
anotheraññaṁ
the body.'sarīran’ti,
Mālukyaputta,mālukyaputta,
with viewdiṭṭhiyā
beingsati
the spiritual lifebrahmacariyavāso
would have beenabhavissāti,
even soevampi
no.no.
the‘Taṁ
souljīvaṁ
thetaṁ
body.'sarīran’ti
or,vā,
Mālukyaputta,mālukyaputta,
with viewdiṭṭhiyā
being,sati,
'the soul is one thing‘aññaṁ
the souljīvaṁ
one thingaññaṁ
the body.'sarīran’ti
orvā
with viewdiṭṭhiyā
beingsati
there is justattheva
birthjāti
……pe…
destructionnighātaṁ
I declare.paññapemi.
'Exists‘Hoti
the realized onetathāgato
afterparaṁ
death.'maraṇā’ti,
Mālukyaputta,mālukyaputta,
with viewdiṭṭhiyā
beingsati
the spiritual lifebrahmacariyavāso
would have beenabhavissāti,
even soevaṁ
no.no.
'Does not‘Na
existhoti
the realized onetathāgato
afterparaṁ
death.'maraṇā’ti,
Mālukyaputta,mālukyaputta,
with viewdiṭṭhiyā
beingsati
the spiritual lifebrahmacariyavāso
would have beenabhavissāti,
even soevampi
no.no.
'Exists‘Hoti
the realized onetathāgato
afterparaṁ
death,'maraṇā’ti
or,vā,
Mālukyaputta,mālukyaputta,
with viewdiṭṭhiyā
being,sati,
'does not‘na
existhoti
the realized onetathāgato
afterparaṁ
death,'maraṇā’ti
orvā
with viewdiṭṭhiyā
beingsati
there is justattheva
birthjāti
……pe…
which Iyesāhaṁ
in this very lifediṭṭheva
in the teachingdhamme
destructionnighātaṁ
I declare.paññapemi.
'Exists‘Hoti
bothca
notna
andca
existshoti
the realized onetathāgato
afterparaṁ
death,'maraṇā’ti,
Mālukyaputta,mālukyaputta,
with viewdiṭṭhiyā
beingsati
the spiritual lifebrahmacariyavāso
would have beenabhavissāti,
even soevaṁ
no.no.
‘the soul is one thing, the body another’ … ‘a realized one still exists after death’ … ‘a realized one no longer exists after death’ … ‘a realized one both still exists and no longer exists after death’ …
‹ Previous · Page 3 of 4 · Next ›
Lite mode — plain HTML for e-readers and old browsers. Full version